To Look Within allows one to Join “T.H.E. T.E.A.M.” (Today's Humane Education To Educate and Motivate!)
By Randy N. Warner

     Due to the fact that I am not only proposing a philosophical conceptual framework regarding the effectiveness of Humane Education, but I am also a practitioner applying my theory within practical contexts, I consider myself an action researcher. In other words, I don’t only provide the rationale and philosophical underpinnings of my work, I actually go out there and apply it hands on. Furthermore, I am collaborating with professional researchers who are capable of taking my findings (i.e. data) and analyzing and interpreting those findings (i.e. scientifically based research).
     Seeing the need for change in the animal protection movement, at some point in time, we must all make the decision to stop exhausting our energies and resources that place their focus on only  cleaning   up yesterday's messes and to  decide we want to see solutions that will ultimately protect the millions and billions of animals yet to be born as well.      Humane Education is the best.... no,  the ONLY means we have to accomplish this goal!.   We must not lose perspective, and we shall choose those campaigns that will save more animals in the long run. The animals who exist today are a very tiny percentage of the animals who will be killed and tortured in the coming centuries and millennia. Paying excessive attention to those who suffer today is condemning millions more to suffer the same fate. We've spent billions of dollars trying to clean up the existing troubles and have given little if any time and effort to tomorrow and all the animals to come. We must all, in the near future, decide that we honestly DO want to see some resolve and to begin a comprehensive effort of learning and education that will truly reduce the number of animal abuse cases and the numbers of unwanted animals being born today

INTRODUCTION For those of you who choose not to purchase and read this book, please make a copy the following story to tell your kids why we've failed to resolve any of these issues and will simply and blindly dump all the related problems in their laps. I mean after all, we'll be dead long before they will, huh?

OUR CHILDREN'S STORY
By Randy N. Warner
     One we must regrettably share with our children for they most certainly will find out on their own. We hope they learn from our foibles stemming from ignorance, apathy and politics. It is, but for our egos, that we have not yet come close to resolving this society's issues of animal abuse and neglect towards the animals of which we share this planet. The noblest of efforts have little affects when unaccompanied by true results.

The Legacy We Leave Them
     We followed the large national groups. For 25 years they promised to solve these problems, if only we would send them money. We did. Nearly $2 Billion each year. In turn, they spent 90 cents from every dollar on high salaries, new cars, luxury items and still ask for more. The ultimate goals were not as important as their individual agendas and egos that keep them in business. Our own apathy was killing all these animals. We hated other animal protection organizations, never spoke to them, but readily spoke ''about'' them. Never shared ideas. For political reasons we were confident it was ''for our own good". Therefore we have no comprehensive program to present to the public or bring to the schools. Our noble attempts quelled by politics ignorance and greed. But our egos were left in tact. Now, sadly we must leave it all to you.

     Remember these things: Work Together. Do Not separate your ideas. Yours may or may not be better than others. Without communication, how will you know? Take One Step AT A Time. Be organized and focus. For decades we've shoved thousands of problems and possible solutions to the public. No unity or clear plan. Too confusing. We looked stupid. We have but few accomplishments.

     POLITICS: IT is in every aspect of our lives. It is the largest hurdle to overcome if we hope to save the animals. Don't let your goals be compromised by ego, emotions, envy or anger like we did. Your egos and feelings may get hurt. BIG DEAL!!! The animals continue to die. Move on. THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!! But certainly more adult than we could handle. Politics has no place here. It must be taught through humane education in schools. The animal problems have plagued us for years and we've turned a blind eye to the fact it's OUR problem to solve. Do not allow the large animal protection groups to continue unchecked.

     Go confidently in the direction that will bring results. Don't be afraid to ''think outside the box''. It scares people. Let them be scared. Humans fear change. They are weak in spirit and ideas. You will lead them in the long run. Don't expect too much from humans. They are limited. Their egos are not. You will experience failures. Keep moving forward. Without them you learn nothing. The successes you will have will be monumental. If you set out to solve a problem, do it with integrity, honesty, fortitude and determination. Sorry we didn't have those qualities. Be smarter than we were. Give voice to the animals.

PREFACE:
     The world is demanding more and more from each generation. Our daily routines are a tightly woven, carefully assembled collection of information that we all need to survive. In knowledge, patience responsibility and compassion, humane education provides the foundation necessary to provide for a better life for all those with whom we share this planet. Conscience has proven to be a much more effective tool than consequence. H. E. is the most important thing that nobody's ever heard of. Things need to change.
     I've been criticized for the cover of the book. 'It looks too much like a self help book. It doesn't resemble animals at all and looks like it's all about people' Well, it is. Of course, the underlying theme is those who help animals. But, remember the 'those' who do that are people. We can accept this look into our movement to protect animals and continue policing ourselves, OR we can let the government take over and implement legislation on our efforts. Which would you want? Remember: Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.

SUGGESTIONS TOWARDS ATTAINABLE SOLUTIONS
     If more than 8 million homeless companion animals are being killed every year, and shelters, schools and society in general assign the lowest budgetary, and operational priority toward overpopulation education, then is there any question as to why we continue to witness the vicious cycle of suffering and death? We must all be willing do a periodic 'once over' on our methods of work ethics and practices. The policing of our efforts is the one and only way in which we can continue to strive for only the best. After all, the numbers of humans who devote their lives to helping the animals is impressive to say the least and many, if not most of them do not take the time to look within or to police the action of others.
Humans make mistakes.
     It's not unheard of for good men and women to be 'off track' and either not be aware of it, or not know how to return to the noble and worthwhile paths in which they began their efforts. So, within this book you will find much that is not complimentary to the movement as a whole. It is not my intention to disgrace, nor demean individuals or organizations. However, there must be accountability for our efforts. The money and time dedicated to this effort are reaching astronomical proportions and we can only do a better job reaching our goals if we can take a step back and recognize that, periodically, there needs to be a cleaning day. That is what I hope this will be.
     Overpopulation is essentially a product of ignorance and indifference and only proactive and aggressive community and youth education programs offer the promise of breaking the vicious cycle. We can’t save them all, but we should be smart in dividing our time and efforts to seeing maximum results for when it comes to precious lives, today's reality cannot serve as tomorrows excuse.

PROBLEM
     Due largely to sparse and painfully ineffectual shelter outreach efforts most of the public has little or no understanding of the horrendous magnitude of the overpopulation tragedy. Compounding the problem, when the public is reached, the message they receive is "sanitized" with enough euphemisms to fill Grand Canyon. Why isn't the unadulterated truth, stripped of any veneer, imaginatively and assertively brought to the public? Perhaps the unvarnished truth would make some uncomfortable, but that is precisely what we should be doing — removing the killing from behind closed doors and informing the public about their role in the massive slaughter of our so-called closest companions. According to interviews with authorities nationwide, the areas having the biggest problems in animal welfare and animal control are these regions that are generally low socioeconomic areas where there is often a large non-English speaking ethnic community and widespread difficulties with basic literacy skills. Whether picked up on the street or surrendered at the shelter, the vast majority of these animals experience the kind of psychological trauma and terror that we find so abhorrent for caged laboratory animals but tolerate in our own facilities. Some are exposed to various forms of physical mishandling and abuse, and all suffer from the anguishing ordeal of being processed and warehoused in a foreign and frightening environment.

Statistics from the National Pet Alliance pages:
     When asked why they were giving up their pet(s), survey participants were allowed to give up to five reasons. The reasons for surrender which survey participants gave included: 1- Behavior problems - aggressiveness. 2- Animal to animal incompatibility 3- House soiling, escapes, too active, needs too much attention, jumps, destructive 4- Medical - ill, injured 5 - Wrong species, sheds, too old, too young, too mellow, wrong sex, not protective 6 - Moving, inadequate facilities, landlord, parents, zoning 7- Can't find homes for litter, too many in home, animal is pregnant 8- Allergies, divorce, gift, new baby, traveling 9 -Unprepared, cost, fears disease, 10- Simply do not bond or like.
In other words, there is a considerable amount of ignorance. Ignorance can be educated away through humane education. Degree of responsibility, things to consider, know the consequences of your decisions, etc.

SOLUTIONS:
     A true civilized society would be a place where life is affirmed, both in teaching and practice, not one which is comfortable with being permeated with the odor of death. A new and larger vision is needed, a vision in which society hold themselves accountable for meeting demanding performance standards that preserve life — not destroy it. Development of appropriate resources to enhance education programs must be a top priority. The principles of care and social responsibility that underlie responsible animal care education programs and are also important in human relationship education not currently being taught in schools. Our movement has to begin anew with each generation because we fail to effectively reach the preceding one, and the animals and the Earth pay dearly for this refusal to invest in the promise of a brighter day.

Education is certainly one of the important tools in achieving effective urban animal management programs in any community. It is also one of the most potent weapons the citizens and various government organizations associated with animal welfare and animal control have to address problems in these areas. The most potent and cost-effective outreach vehicle is the development of a creative volunteer program. The focus of this crucial outreach instrument is youth education. This area receives tremendous lip service about youth representing the future, but it invariably receives the lowest budgetary priority. We must take the initiative by approaching every school, media outlet, club, civic organization, professional association, shopping center, and wherever people will listen. When it comes to precious lives, today's reality cannot serve as tomorrows excuse.
Our current society is entangled in a convoluted system that places a higher operational priority on "painless" execution than preventive education.
CONCLUSION:
     No matter how much positive education the community is exposed to, there will always be an element of our society that is unresponsive to community pressures and that fails to conform to conventional and respected codes of behavior when it comes to animal treatment and management. But the concept of 'education' must go beyond instruction given in schools by teachers or education officers to knowledge, training and skills in a particular field given to the community at large by every available practical means. Not only does this mean using simple posters, flyers and the media but it also embraces the precept that effective education often occurs through the process of prosecution.   

Can anyone guess why this book will be received with pure unadulterated anger and even vengeance towards me? Because, even though we are used to hearing ''Government Reform' and 'Education Reform' you never hear 'Animal Protection'' reform because everyone in the movement is one of the following: Highly paid and do little more than push papers and learn how to beg for more money, OR are so entrenched in their own objectives and efforts, that any mention of change would be seen as a blow to their efforts and are then, ignored. Of course a good majority of them are so egotistical that they may just love this book, but will forever thing I was talking about everyone BUT them. Too many folks refuse to acknowledge that 'policing' of an industry is absolute necessity.     

It is the only means of keeping the focus on a common goal and to prevent mishaps or certain areas or entities from straying. It's truly not intended to slam, belittle nor point fingers. Few of the millions of Americans who read this will agree with anything I say because it makes them look bad. Absolutely not my intention at all. I'm only trying to make change so that this movement can see a noticeable degree of improvement in short order. Of course, that is not likely to happen BECAUSE OF THE PREVIOUS 218 words. But, here goes anyway. I can only hope that at least 10 % of the animal protection advocates will recognize that humans are the only ones that can overcome all that is preventing animals from abuse and neglect and unnecessary death. And that for the last 50 years, we've been unable to do that BECAUSE OF THE PREVIOUS 242 words.

     I'm a 51 year old college educated male who's primary goal in life is to see humane education programs in each and every classroom in the nation through dedicated volunteer efforts. It is proven that consequence is not nearly as effective as conscience. So, I'm not a big supporter of new laws. We have the laws on the books now that we won't or can't enforce. To enforce the laws we have now would ultimately result in solving most of the problems we experience. Common police work and humane education would most assuredly take care of any remaining violations that would surface. With the appropriate instruction and guidance to young people, this type program provides young people as well as troubled and at risk teens, the moral structure necessary to give them higher academic achievement scores, improved attendance rates and they also tend to adopt a less violent conflict resolution technique. It is important to note, for all who think that humane education will have no effect on young people or adults, that it is exactly the same manner in which we began to clean up litter, learn not to pollute the air as well as to recycle. It is simply the next logical step for a civilized society. This, too will save tax dollars, improve our society and reduce the suffering of millions of companion animals each year in this country.
     Life, as I knew it, changed drastically and forever when I adopted my first dog as a full fledged adult in 1981 as I was preparing to move from Ohio to California. Not only did I have a clue that I would find myself embroiled in a battle where I would be forced to stand up against the ignorance of authority and fight an unjust system but the one I am going to tell you about is really important as it stands on its own. But, once it was over, I realized that this type of uninformed and greedy, callous unawareness was epidemic across our great nation. Most importantly, is what we as animal protection advocates should be very aware of.
     My childhood was spent at the north end of Pleasant Hill Ohio with my parents and two sisters that were already out of the house and living on their own by the time I started first grade. Regularly attended The Church of The Brethren on Main Street (a more modern branch of the Amish community) and many church related events, we were a religious family and had a wonderful childhood and upbringing in this small Midwestern town of 1,000 which quietly sits along side the Stillwater river. Newton High School Indians had a marvelous competitive marching band and still are highly respected 35 years after I've graduated. The town is proud of the band and is one where everyone knows everyone else. Other than that, if you blink while going through my home town, you will likely crash into the monument in the middle of the street. We always had two dogs. When one would pass away, we'd have another as soon as possible - once in a while even on the same day. They slept inside the house on a bed we made for them in the service room off the kitchen at night and outside during the day, with access to the garage and a nice dog house my father built in there. Never seemed to matter what type, size or personality the dogs had. They would soon find themselves as part of a family who would love them anyway and life went on. Sometimes puppies, sometimes not.
     Throughout my younger life and on into high school years, we would travel out of town to visit relatives, I certainly remember how wonderfully all the aunts and uncles got along with each other. All my fathers brothers, as well as all my mothers sisters were very close to each other and each one in their own right could have been committed to a mental institution by almost any standards. Good strong people who would do or say anything to make the others laugh. And laugh we did. Everyone had an incredible sense of humor. But two things stand out about my childhood: First is: if I heard a marching band practicing at the local high school, my mom knew that there was simply no way to keep me from it and from the ripe old age of 5, I was walking around strange communities alone in search of that band I heard practicing and wouldn't leave until it was finished. To this day, there is nothing that will bring me much more joy than a good parade, marching band competition or the likes. Secondly, on the way home, sometimes we would see a dog laying along the road and that would just break my heart. I would cry and ask daddy to stop and see if it was still alive and would then just wonder and worry for the remainder of the trip home. It was devastating to me. I just adored dogs and felt badly that we couldn't explain why their lives were not as good as ours.

As a young boy growing up around our farming community, my parents and I would visit other families from our church and when I would be where someone never allowed their dogs to come inside the house for anything or worse yet , tied them up to a chain, I'd quickly eat and then run out and just sit there petting the dog and talking to it. They don't understand my words, but they made it very clear that they appreciated my kindness and attention while I was there. But, as far back as I can remember, I never met a dog that I didn't adore and stoop down to give it a kiss on the nose. Surprisingly enough, I've only been bitten by 2, maybe three of them and even then, it was not an angry bite, but one which was defensive because the animal had never had anyone offer up that level of affection before. That to me was very sad. People used to say to me 'With your love of animals, you should work with dogs or at an animal shelter or something. ABSOLUTELY NOT, I thought to myself. The dog catcher is a BAD person and I'm not bad. And the people who are involved with animal issues are all a bunch of crazy nuts that should be committed. I just knew I wouldn't be able to get along with people like that.
     Ok, so I've learned that not all dog catchers are bad, and that they are simply doing a job. So, I was 50% correct. I've seen my living conditions decline so drastically over the past ten years, it's just amazing. Placing all my efforts into the battle that you are about to read about, but many more as well. Surprisingly enough, I'm more often judged by the style or quality of home I live in, than my work. I'm not sure I would change anything of my past, though. I am working with what I have and using what I know. I've done this all for the ability to get where I am today to help the animals. Just haven't done the 'financial' part of life. Oh, I could pretend to love animals and get a lot of cash, nice salary, new car, nice home and even use the corporate jet to fly to my vacation home, but I have never been a fan of the HSUS or the other large groups who have their hands out 365 days a year begging for money to help these creatures of God, but never seem to be able to solve any of the problems.
     I guess they view solutions as being equivalent of writing their own pink slips. But, as you'll see throughout this book, I am just way to shy and reserved to ever let my opinions be known (ha ha ) - especially if it were to bring harm or question to another group or person. Please don't allow the fact that Randy Warner is actually proud of his ''being blacklisted '' by the HSUS as a sign that he may have ever spoken out in a critical manner in regards to their efforts. What is it that they actually do again?      On the other hand, I tend to view goals such as 'solving the animal abuse problems and the horrors of pet overpopulation as being a great achievement. Heck. I'd LOVE to put myself out of business by doing the right thing for them. But, to do so, you must do one of the following: You must offend people when you tell them they are doing wrong, then find a way to enforce it. Or, begin a comprehensive and substantive program of humane education through volunteer efforts to be implemented into our nation's schools.
     The larger organizations are not willing to do either one. Each person they ''offend''' may choose not to donate next year. And they don't have a clue as to what true volunteerism is. And to have the program that I speak of actually throughout our school system, could force them to reduce their staff by 50% if not more. BECAUSE THE BIGGEST PROBLEMS WE FACE are the easiest to correct, but they are also the biggest reasons people continue to donate to them. However 'old fashioned' and corny it sounds to have been raised in a small Midwestern town such as this, I do remember a variety of ways that we were all taught humane education. The most obvious for that time and lifestyles that people lived back then, was to witness what your parents did, how they reacted, etc. Then we would also bring it up in conversation over the dinner table each evening.
Of course that is not nearly as likely in today's busy lives everyone leads. So, this valuable information has just sort of slipped out of our lives simply due to the lack of communications throughout the family. We also welcomed officers and volunteers from our county animal control, the Cincinnati Zoo and on a few occasions, from National Geographic Magazine people for full school assemblies. So, Humane Education in our schools is by no means a 'new and modern idea'.
     The following 'History Of Humane Education' is from www.animalpeoplenews.org “ANIMAL PEOPLE is the leading independent newspaper providing original investigative coverage of animal protection worldwide, founded in 1992. Our readership of 30,000-plus includes the decision-makers at more than 9,000 animal protection organizations. We have no alignment or affiliation with any other entity.”
No, it's not a new idea at all - as a matter of fact, The Unti/DeRosa chapter on humane education is the most thorough treatment we have seen yet of the rise and fall of humane education as a movement unto itself during the early 20th century. The Bands of Mercy organized by Massachusetts SPCA founder George Angell and successors eventually reached more than four million children with an ambitious equation of humane education with moral education. Broadly accepted then, including in denouncing hunting and vivisection, the Bands of Mercy program would now be considered too radical for school use. After the outbreak of WW I, The message of universal peace through humane education was subordinated to patriotic imperatives. Humane education did not become more central to the work of SPCA's in the years that followed.
     Instead, as humane societies took on animal control duties to ensure economic survival, the growing burden of capturing and killing homeless dogs and cats, cast other initiatives, including humane education, to the margins of activity. What survived was the simple lessons of kindness to pets. Both self censorship and the constraints imposed by educational institutions, prevented humane education from reaching into the realm of institutionalized use of animals, such as animal experimentation and the mass production of animals for food and fur. More than half of the Unti/DeRosa chapter dwells on the difficulty of quantifying the effects of humane education, reflecting the contemporary obsession with the meeting standards with can be verified through testing. But humane education has had one verifiable success, Unti and DeRosa conclude: "Whatever the level of success on other fronts of humane work, wanton acts of individual cruelty against pets are now usually seen as the signs of a maladjusted and sick personality.     

Conversely, a kind disposition toward such animals is considered an important attribute of the well adjusted individual. Actually, British satirical engraver William Wogarth among others, counted on his audience to have similar views long before there were any humane societies. However, schoolroom humane education has probably help to validate and empower the feelings of the majority of people who disapprove of cruelty. A series of surveys done in China since 1998 show that attitudes toward cruelty to animals there are essentially the same as in the US, - but in China, because people who disapprove of cruelty are conspicuous, especially by the minority of the population who eat dogs and cats and wildlife and by those who attend zoos as spectacles rather than from the love of animals. This is something that needs to be re introduced to our younger generation NOW. Even after reading this book, there will be those who will ask 'BUT, WHY NOW?'
Here is my response.
     In 1999, adults in this country, made decisions which ultimately resulted in the unnecessary killing of over 8 million adoptable pets!!! Our children can do better if only given the proper information. We just need to show them the 21st Century Cares! This section on the next few pages is intended to answer the question of “WHY” to Humane Education. One of the most noticeable results of these programs is the development of a more sophisticated and solid moral structure for today's youth – providing them with a clearer picture, or ‘direction' from which they will navigate through life. They will come to enjoy education more, resulting in higher attendance, more participation in the field of science, lower drop-out rates, etc. Too many animals are suffering and loosing their lives needlessly due to humans. We are proud Americans! We want to continue saluting this flag with all the pride it deserves. STOP THE NEEDLESS KILLING OF THESE ANIMALS!!
PROBLEMS WE HOPE TO SOLVE...
 

ABUSE: Every community has its problems. But, everyone would just be horrified by the statistics and stories given by their local police and animal control officers. The animals are unable to protect themselves or to report these actions. Additionally, many, who are aware of these atrocities, refuse to report the acts or even to address the perpetrators. We all have the responsibility to report these criminal acts.
 

UNAWARENESS: As we know, the general public not only has LITTLE perspective on what the issues are, but an appalling ignorance as well. If you are unaware of the problem or what the cause is, there is no possible means of solving it. Unawareness is ignorance.
 

APATHY: “Oh I can’t do anything. I’m just one person.” NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. But, apathy IS our biggest single problem.  Correct, one individual voice has it's limitations in volume. But, a chorus of 5,000,000 individuals singing together is a much different and more powerful sound! Apathy is a form of ignorance. Apathy and unawareness will assure photos like this will always be with us. Don’t be afraid to speak up!! Let this innocent pup have a good life. WHAT GOT US TO THIS POINT.
 

IRRESPONSIBILITY: “When the time comes, I might get involved”. What are you waiting for?????? The average John and Jane Q Public feel they have the sufficient knowledge to train their new pet. Yet, the single largest problem people list when relinquishing their pets to the pounds is the 'owner's' lack of training skills - admitting the obvious, all too late. “Not being housebroken”, ‘not able to stop the jumping’, not able to walk him on a leash’ are the three most often heard. THESE ARE NOT FAULTS OF THE PET, but of the human. Yet, millions will go to the pound to die! Every time you witness a human abusing an animal, it is the human who has just admitted they are too stupid to have the knowledge necessary to communicate properly. They will try to cover up by pointing fingers at the ‘stupid’ or ‘aggressive’ animal. DENIAL: Humans typically repress painful things that they're made aware of. This is due to their own shortcomings and personal failures. Most Americans tend to view the problems of animal abuse and pet overpopulation from the same vantage point.
HERE IS THE PROBLEM: IF WE CONTINUE TO DENY OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO THE SIMPLE, EASY SOLUTION, CONTINUE TO TURN OUR BACKS ON THESE PROBLEMS AND REFUSE TO SPEAK OUT WHEN WE SEE ABUSE AND NEGLECT, THEN WHEN DO YOU EXPECT TO SEE THESE THINGS REALLY BEGIN TO IMPROVE???
AMERICA’S GROSS MISCONCEPTIONS -

POMPOSITY: Those who think that having that ‘accidental’ or ‘recreational’ litter of puppies or kittens is ok for THEM but not for others. They ARE the problem. “We've already got homes for most of them." Then, there is the "But, it's my right to have a litter if I want to!" Showing, clearly, that it's those who don't know how to play as a team, that most assuredly help to loose the game. Goodness, where are their heads? Let's see, 5,000,000 pompous folks thinking like this X 5 pets per litter = 25,000,000 MORE pets into a society that already has 8,000,000 or more pets to death each year, simply due to a lack of homes.
 

GREED: Most of us want the easy way out. We don’t take the appropriate action, so we ‘donate’ to these groups. The large animal organizations want to make a living the easy way, too. Example: Each year we give hundreds of $$MILLION$$ to the Humane Society of the Unites States. Oh, I'm sure they have a highly paid Public Relations person who would provide ‘lip service’ to argue this thought. They send us photos of helpless, caged animals, while extending their hands asking for dollars to solve the problems. Has it worked? NO! . And, we would believe them because top executives would never lie to us, now would they? Their high level executives make salaries of over $250,000 per year. This organization has bank accounts with up to $$100 MILLION$$ just sitting there. They could easily focus on one of the main problems in this country and solve it in a years’ time. But, they don’t. They are actually surviving on the failures of the problems that we pay them to solve. We must admit the problems are ours and ours to solve. Like our fanatical minority and religious leaders, our large animal welfare organizations need their victims. Absent crime and imaginary situations against their people and teachings, these organizations disappear -- this means jobs. As long as they can convince those who don’t know any better, they will survive.

PROPERTY STATUS: We're only talking about ONE right concerning animals, the right NOT to be viewed or classified as property. Then, of course there are the issues surrounding insufficient animal protective legislation at all levels, as well as the nationwide refusal to enforce existing laws or to prosecute those who are offenders: most especially the verbiage used to describe them as “PROPERTY” and ‘things’ referring to them as ‘its’. The NRA has a huge role to play in this argument. They certainly aren’t the brightest in the bunch – just one of the largest. They support the hunters, who seem to say the animals ‘belong’ to us. Somehow, I don’t believe our forefathers would support our present views on guns, nor do I think our creator would be pleased with our treatment of other beings on this planet. Then, there are those who place “Free to Good Home’ ads. This, once healthy and loved Doberman Pincher “Mitsi” ended up in a home that raises and fights dogs. She was hastily placed through a ‘Free To Good Home’ ad with no background check or agreement with the adopting party. Mitsi died 2 weeks after this article was published. Read below: (by In Defense of Animals and decide which would be best for your pet.) DEFINITIONS:
 

OWNER: One who has legal title for, or right to, or possession of an ‘item’ ‘thing’ or ‘object’.
 

GUARDIAN: One who adopts a baby or an animal for reasons of providing necessary care, nurturing, guidance and love, food water and shelter, in order to ensure a safe and healthy and happy life WHICH DO YOU THINK IS THE BEST FOR YOU AND YOUR DOG?
 

WHAT DOES THIS DO TO OUR SOCIETY?

It cuts through the very fabric of civilization. Hate groups are gaining members in record numbers. Hate crimes and animal abuse cases are both on the rise at alarming rates and can be directly linked to one another. Some of the social problems include, but are not limited to: criminal behavior towards animals and humans: weakened moral development: poor academic achievement; and disinterest in academics and having an extremely poor knowledge on such issues as basic care for companion animals. WHAT CAN PEOPLE DO? WE NEED TO REBUILD OUR ENTIRE WAY OF THINKING, VIEWING AND TEACHING OF ISSUES REGARDING ANIMAL SAFETY AND WELL BEING!! DO NOT ALLOW THE LARGE HUMANE SOCIETIES TO CONVINCE YOU THE SOLUTION IS OUT OF REACH!!! Obviously, changes need to occur. We need to break the chain of ignorance that allows our youth to follow the behavior of their parents. Those students who received the Humane Education program had significantly higher knowledge scores related to humane treatment of animals as well as humans and suggested awareness, empathy, and adoption of non-violent conflict resolution techniques.

We realize Americans are busier now than ever before. We must remember that the animals still need our patience, understanding and love. It’s really quite simple – quite elementary! Without this, by means of selfish and uninformed adults, they will likely suffer, and possibly even die. But, it’s not going to happen ‘magically’ either. WE MUST ALL BE RESPONSIBLE!! It takes all of us working together. It means that we must all be aware of other's efforts to prevent any duplication of efforts. If we know what others are doing, it allows us to see what it is we need to do. Let’s make sure that each of us takes that extra step and promise to speak out - to share this information with those who are unlikely to visit this and other similar sites. BEFORE YOU GET YOUR NEXT PUPPY, GO TO THE LOCAL AND AREA DOG POUNDS 2 – 3 TIMES TO LOOK. YOU JUST MAY FIND THE DOG OF YOUR DREAMS, DREAMING OF YOU! IN THE HOUR IT WILL TAKE YOU TO BROWSE THROUGH OUR SITE, www.21stcenturycares.org/) 1,000 INNOCENT LIVES WILL BE LOST IN THE U.S. ALONE. WE HAVE THE KEY TO SOLVE THIS! EVERYONE SHOULD CARRY THE TORCH FOR HUMANE EDUCATION!

Americans: We cure diseases. We invent things that change the world on a daily basis. We win wars in 100 days or less. We put a man on the moon over 40 years ago and have now reached MARS. And we have the marketing prowess to change human existence and habits on a global scale, but have not been able to properly relay some very simple messages to society in regards to the overwhelming mistreatment of Gods' other living beings. WHY?

The purpose of writing this book is to show how totally uninformed and out of touch the human race can be on issues that involve and surround each one of us on a daily basis. The constant positioning for fame and monetary donations by the larger national groups, slandering of and by rescuers on so many levels against each other and even the ignorance of judges who were to hear my case in court. I'm willing to bet that most of you have learned things already and were amazed to realize just how many problems we have and how deeply they are embedded into our society - making it simply go away in our minds. I hope those who read this book will be able to see just how simple and inexpensive it would be if the decisions made, were somehow based on solid research, testing, survey results, etc.

It's difficult to imagine that the pet store business is still such a strong market. Oh, don't get me wrong, the animals are quite a crowd catcher at the mall and the puppies and kittens would melt the hearts of most I would think. But, seeing as though the larger organizations have a great deal of knowledge on where these puppies and kittens come from, their health being such an issue, the abuse that takes place with the breeding females, the strong propensity for the 'spur of the moment' decision resulting in a vicious circle of abuse and neglect.

But, they have done little to promote the evils of pet stores and to show them the facts, they have done nothing to campaign strongly against the puppy mill operations around the nation and I would venture to guess that if we took a poll at the local pet store which displays puppies and kittens, that it would be difficult to even find a patron that was aware of the difficult situations these animals have come from. One of the most surprising and angering things I hear on a regular basis is 'I am going to breed my dog. It's got AKC papers and has a disposition that others like" Of course, the other sad excuses are 'accidental litters' or 'we wanted to breed our dog once as we heard it helps the disposition of the mother'.

What this clearly tells me is two fold: The larger organizations have truly failed to get this simple and foundational message of stopping overpopulation out to the general public to the extent that they actually recognize that EVERYONE must be on the same page and that each one of us truly matters in the decisions we make.
     I had a friend named Kathy for about 10 years. I trained her dog, placed a second one with them and stayed in close contact throughout the years. Recently when her primary dog passed on, she paid good money to purchase a full blooded Dalmatian instead of going to a rescue, but most disturbing is, she decided to breed the new dog ''because she felt the breed was endangered and she could help strengthen it by having a litter”! I am amazed that this degree of ignorance can permiate people who are otherwise educated and informed. She knew what all I went through with my Dalmatian rescue efforts. She actually had the gall to tell me she thought she had to 'protect' the Dalmatian breed by having a litter with her dog - the dog she bought from a back yard breeder who couldn't even show it in the ring due to it's poor stance and markings. It should be coming much more clear to everyone that it's not possible to train adults - only the young people.
     I'm just trying to explain that, from my experiences in working in animal protection for over 20years, most of the major problems we face and experience on a daily basis can be so very easily solved, solved quickly and without costing tax dollars and even saving nearly $2 billion annually.
The additional benefits of achieving a more compassionate society are well documented by receiving a aggressive humane education program in schools. The next generation should be as prepared to handle this changing world as they can possibly be. We need to teach them what the problems are and how to make better and more informed decisions than we have made.

Outside dogs is another thing I don't quite understand. Here is what we know of an 'outside' dog. It is more likely to bark and upset the neighbors, causing complaints and disagreements, has a greater chance of escaping repeatedly, is much more likely to bite an innocent visitor, will incur hip problems, anger problems and be socially inept when in contact with humans as well as other animals. Sadly, it is also going to experience a much shorter life due to diseases and or being relinquished by the humans to the animal facility. I'm familiar with hundreds of dog breeds, but what's an outside dog? Unless you're medically intolerant of the dog (and therefore can't take care of him in a medical emergency, so you shouldn't have the dog anyway), making a dog stay outside is a costly waste. If he's for protection, what do you think I want to steal - your lawn? When you leave, do you put your valuables and your kids out in your yard? Just what is the dog protecting out there?
     Most dogs kept outside cause far more nuisance complaints from barking and escaping than any deterrent to intrusion. Such complaints cause teasing, antagonism, release and poisoning. With your dog a helpless victim, it's no laughing matter. If I'm a crook and your dog is out, your fence protects ME, not your possessions or your dog. If I just open the gate, 9 out of 10 dogs will run off! I can safely shoot, stab, spear, poison, snare, strangle them, or dart through the fence and you just lost your dog AND everything I steal! If he's tied up and I keep out of reach, he's useless. He'll bark, but outside dogs bark so much, they're usually ignored. But let a dog hit the other side of a door or window I'm breaking into, and I'm GONE! I can't hurt the dog until he can hurt me, and nothing you own is worth my arm. Deterrence is effective protection.
     Protection and aggression are not the same. Protection is defensive, reactive, often passive, and threatens or injures no one. Aggression is active, harmful and offensive, threatens all and benefits none. Yard dog soften develop far more aggression than protectivity because everyone who passes by or enters has already violated the territory that dog has marked dozens of times a day for years. That's not protection, it's not desirable and it overlooks two facts of life today: First, property owners have implied social contracts with others in the community. Letter carriers, paper boys, delivery people, law enforcement, emergency medical personnel, meter readers and others are allowed near and at times on your property without your specific permission. And sure that ten-year-old was not supposed to jump your fence after his Frisbee; but neither you nor your dog are allowed to cause him injury if he does.
     Imagine this: A neighbor looks into your yard or window and sees you, your wife or child laying on the floor in a pool of blood. They call 9-1-1 and your dog prevents paramedics from assisting! Should they shoot your dog or just let you die? Great choice. Second, even if the intruder is a criminal, few places allow you or your dog to cause physical injury to prevent property loss. Convicted felons have sued the dog's owner from jail and won more in the suit than they ever could have stolen! Appalling? True. And don't be foolish enough to believe your homeowner's insurance will cover the loss. Now you see why many feel that an outside dog is a no-brainer. The more a dog is outdoors, the less behavioral control you have. It's easier to solve four or five indoor problems than one outdoor problem. The reason is valid and simple: The more you control the stimuli that reaches your dog, the more you control the responses. You've got a lot more control over your living room than you do over your entire county! When your dog is bored, but teased by every dog, cat, bird, squirrel, motorcycle, paperboy, airplane, firecracker and backfiring truck in the county, OF COURSE he'll dig, chew, and bark. Would you sit still all day everyday? Do you want unnecessary medical and parasite fees, especially as the dog ages?
     When a dog is alone indoors, you are still 30% there because your scent and things he associates with you, constantly remind the dog of you and your training. When he's out, your dog is alone whether you're home or not. Do you really expect him to keep YOU in mind while the entire world teases, distracts and stimulates him? The media is full of stories about the family dog saving everyone's life during a fire. How many people, including children, would be dead today if those dogs were kept outside? SURE - you ALWAYS get up to investigate every time your yard dog barks. And I've got this bridge to sell you. An outdoor dog has an address, not a home.
      Dogs offer real value as companion animals. Stop behavior problems and start enjoying real protection and companionship. Bring your dogs inside. See what Tammy has done with www.dogsdeservebetter.com with legislation and education successfully rallying against this ignorance.
     If the larger organizations would place their focus on companion animals, the topic that effects everyone in one way or another, they would then see that something is being done, that things can be accomplished on a grand scale and that we do have a responsibility in improving the lives of all living things. I say this because the companion animal is all around us, has a stronger effect on most families than an endangered primate far away, and would be a very easy example if presented properly through schools and the media.
     Presently, if one were to log onto the HSUS website, it is so overwhelming and difficult to navigate, that you simply feel that you are so insignificant. you loose hope quickly. I also believe that is one of their strategies, so that folks will continue to give money and so that the public does not expect to see many results during their lifetime. After all, you cannot ignore the fact that their first and foremost goal is to keep themselves in business through donations. THEN to fund animal issues ''as they see fit''. Thus their expenditures of spending 90cents for every dollar donated to funding their own survival through many 6 figure salaries, luxury office buildings and more. One thin dime for every dollar is then spent on charity efforts towards animals - many of those chosen charities are actually branch organizations which they themselves own - thus taking that dime from one pocket and simply placing it into another pocket.

We'll get to more of this later, but if you have questions on this, just try to get a public dialogue started with them and ask them to explain this. They will clam up and shut down so tightly it's amazing. The larger animal organizations have certainly made this world a better place through their efforts. But when you consider the ridiculous amounts of money that they receive each year, it is very clear that much more could have been done through education to reduce the suffering.
     We all need to be more pro active and to speak out to them, our local authorities, by voting in candidates who share our beliefs and then live up to their promises. People in general are so very uninformed about what is going on around them, who is creating the problems that cost us billions annually in tax dollars to run the archaic, unprepared and overworked animal control we've grown accustomed to or what it would take to solve these problems. That is where humane education comes into the picture. In the past 20 years, Americans have donated an additional $1billion annually to one of 3,000 non profits in this country that are devoted to seeing change in the way we handle and care for animals. Additionally, we have logged nearly 50 billion man hours on the same problems. 50 billion man hours, $40billion with 3,000 groups working towards the same goal!!!!! Are you kidding me? Why in the world would we not be able to see some solutions by now?
     With each of the larger national groups working on their own agendas such as not eating meat, or trying to rid society of even owning pets at all, they all work separately. The efforts cannot seem to agree that they have so much in common, nor work together to sustain a forward movement. One is radical, the others are smooth in their presentations, but most are seen as 'tree huggers' and nuts. They are very secretive about their innermost operations and are loosing respect at an alarming rate. The simple messages have not been delivered to the general public in a manner which can implement results. So, since each one of the major national groups tells a different story to describe their efforts and intentions, they are also striving for much different goals, have differing agendas and believe it or not, they all have some level of ego that keeps them going.
     These egos trickle down to the lowest of all efforts as well. Egos that prevent them from joining another group or combining efforts of existing groups. The problem here lies in the total lack of a unified message to the media and the public. Then when you figure in the constant and ongoing fundraising and inter mingle all that with the politics that keeps their given organization afloat, it's more than a mess out there. It's chaos in a big pot of pea soup. The problem with pets is one that will affect everyone at some point in their lives. Yet NOBODY will ever discuss the proper care of your pets. It's simply assumed that everyone knows how to put food down and change the water once or twice a week. After all, nobody wants to look foolish any more than we already do. This family has pets altered. That family allows the occasional litter. The man down the street ties his dog to a short chain. My mom brings all five of her shepherds inside when ever they wish. They even have a doggy door. Personally I have found that one single dog is just too much trouble. I would never in my life have just one dog. By getting a second one, they play and tire each other out. To a given extent, I see how people could go their entire lives and not involve themselves in a serious discussion on pet care for your particular home environment. Yet, if we were to tackle and ultimately resolve the issues surrounding our beloved pets, the rest of the animal issues would then have more meaning to the people and would begin to take on a different light.
     The problem is presented to us as an overwhelming and mind boggling world wide dilemma that just seems to daunting to most. Therefore they tend to do nothing. Remember that apathy is the single largest hurdle we face if we want to see resolve in these issues. Since the problems upset so many people, they prefer not to 'see' what they see or help out because the feel no amount will make any difference. Our society has become complacent in most of these issues. On the large scale, I understand that.
     What I don't understand is how people can see that their brother, or neighbor or boss is mistreating their pets, or neglecting them or doing one or more of a multitude of outrageously stupid behavior and treatment and nobody even makes a quiet suggestion to him in hopes of improvement. ''Yea, he's practically making his dog crazy or beating it at night time or rarely remembers to feed and water the poor thing...... BUT ITS' REALLY NOT MY PLACE TO SAY ANYTHING. 'I'm one of those people who says it like it is. NO ROSE COLORED GLASSES AROUND HERE.
     I not only can't tolerate people's ignorance of that damn elephant in the middle of their living room, but am inclined to throw the glasses on the floor and make the elephant step on them. When it comes to the safety and well being of a pet in your care, YOU DARNED WELL BETCHA I'LL SPEAK OUT. Studies have proven that there are very strong links between those who abuse animals and those who will commit more violent crimes later in life. Even for those who are 'ignorantly' neglecting and/or abusing, there is a much stronger propensity for them to 'forget' or simply not care to feed his pet or bring it in out of the freezing rain for the night. The same person will run your elderly mother down with his car as she crossed the street and then sue your family for damage done to his car.
     Quite different are these ways of caring or in some ways not caring for pets. None are illegal, but some could be viewed as somewhat abusive or in poor taste for the dog's best health. So what if you are taken to court for a silly ridiculous reason that would just boggle your mind, so you decide to fight it, just on principal. All that you expect of yourself is that you will drag it out in the court procedure and thumb your nose at the system that has so many flaws. But when you appear in front of a judge ( or in my case 32 different ones in just 3 1/2 years) and most of them simply dismissed the charges against me due to their total lack of knowledge surrounding the issue at hand. When the agency that actually filed the charges was asked by the courts to provide the description of the written law, even they could not do it as one would expect. Let me just say before going any farther, that everyone involved in this case or even living in the same county certainly came away with a much greater understanding and appreciation of what a dog rescuer must go through to avoid jail time, yet how very much they have in common with the animal control officers and agency that are the source of most of their headaches and nightmares. I'm trying to paint you a picture of all that lead up to this, what I learned and how I learned it, but most importantly, what I plan to do with the information.
     My biggest challenge here is to write this in a way that everyone will see the value and importance of humane education for almost every age and income level of living humans, but really begin a serious effort to include this in our nations' schools normal curriculum. When I got into training for my rescue dogs, I was even more amazed at how people in southern CA would just give me $1,000 without blinking an eye, but then expected their dog (s) to be trained from that point on - didn't want to have to ''do '' things once they got the dog home. Since most of my training was 'labeled' behavior modification' it was really only showing the people that training, as most of you picture it in their mind, is not necessary to have a good dog. If you will simply give the puppy or kitten all the love, exercise and socialization for the first 2-3 years that it is clearly telling you it needs, then you will most assuredly have one of the best and most perfectly matched pets that anyone could ever ask for. Likely to be at your side loving and protecting for upwards of 15 years nowadays. The ignorance of MOST people when they bring me a dog that has an aggression problem - AND THEN TO GET THE HUMANS TO CHANGE THEIR OWN BEHAVIOR is like pulling teeth.
     Quite frankly, the ignorance by almost everyone on the issues of proper care and responsibility of their pets is more than words can describe I believe. I decided that nationwide humane education program was the best - no, the ONLY means of ever seeing resolve towards the issues of protecting the animals. Not promoting activism, protests, bans or boycotts. Simple Knowledge. Understanding that each of our decisions has an impact that causes harm, discomfort or death to animals and the environment every day. So, why in the world has it been going on so long and, although seeing some improvements, we still kill good healthy living beings by the millions in this country each year. Not for sport. Not for profit, and not for food or clothes, but simply out of sheer ignorance of humans.
     Throughout the book I plan to explain my role as a rescuer: All that I wanted to do, all that I had to do to adopt the dogs out, to avoid any battles with the law, and how it simply took over my life in a very short time. When I believe in something, and am pushed backwards a step, I then will push forward 2, maybe 3 steps regardless, in order to show my point. By the same token, I could clearly see that rescue was NOT where I needed to spend the rest of my life, but by using all the ignorant and irresponsible stories that were given to me by the thousands of families who ''WERE FORCED TO GET RID OF THEIR DOG'' for some ridiculously weak excuse, I could take that information and put it to good use. If ignorance is educate-able, the there just absolutely MUST be some movement for humane education.
     Seeing how these otherwise educated and caring folks just simply could not accept 'learning' a different way to do things, and recognizing that I was much like that also in many circumstances, I also realized right up front that this would not be anything geared towards the adults, but to the children. Children are already in the mindset of learning at school and have brains much like sponges that will absorb anything we throw at them. Doing a good enough job, we could only hope that they would also share their new found knowledge with the adults in their homes also. Trying to teach an adult a new and better way to provide for his/her pet is much like convincing your spouse that YOU WERE RIGHT in that argument you had last night. Just ain't gonna happen.
     I'd been taking my Dalmatians into schools and classrooms for almost 10 years before I began to think of a larger and more detailed and substantive program on a nationwide scale, so by the time I re grouped my entire presentation, included dogs other than Dalmatians Those rescue women are idiots and you will hear me confirm this several times in this book. Anyway, I actively pursued other dogs and have a black lab, basset hound, white German shepherd, pit bull and a full coyote. I'm so glad I expanded my family. It was AFTER I thought of taking this to a much larger scale when I finally began experiencing all this trouble in Riverside County with their 'Hillbilly Mafia' called the Board of Supervisors and the criminal element who ran and still does run the Riverside County Animal Control in Riverside as well as the Lake Elsinore Animal Friends who seem to spend most of their time wallowing and basking in the imaginary fame and accomplishments and never really seem to get anything of substance done. Oh Wait, They do get a lot of political rumblings and jabs at any and all other animal groups, so that they would always remain at the top of the heap and continue to be the most favored and most respected.

NOTHING WILL STAND IN THEIR WAY to assure their first place standing will be a battle to the death with anyone who feels they may challenge it. This was their way of 'working together' and always amazed me. I was in this for the true reason of helping the animals. NOT ONCE DID I THINK OF DOING THIS SO I COULD MAKE MORE FRIENDS!!! And, it's a good thing, too. The reason for writing this book is to incorporate my trials and tribulations of battling with authorities and to show just how totally ignorant we all were when this first began. All the way up through the animal control officers and even to many of the judges I appeared in front of. If you have a weak stomach or are quite emotional don't worry at all. We will laugh, cry, hate, fear and much more. While reading this book you'll be pulling your hair out in clumps and will likely threaten to take someone's life out of sheer frustration. A week stomach and 'emotional' states will be welcomed after you're done here.
     When I first arrived in Southern California I lived in the Hollywood hills for two years and then moved to Dana Point along the beach between the Harbor and the Ritz Carlton. My experiences with rescue efforts came in every imaginable shape, size color, smell and degree of difficulty. I had my Dalmatian as well as one of her puppies at my side everywhere I went. Not being a drinker or dancer, I spent my weekends walking along Sunset or Hollywood Blvds for entertainment and was sometimes viewed as 'the entertainment' as well. People would approach me to ask if I would be able to take their Dalmatian because it was just not behaving for them. This would happen 2-3 times per year. Each one of them came into our home and just couldn't have been nicer. No aggression, no pottying in the house, followed the lead of Maddy and Aja quickly, so there was no trouble at all. It certainly didn't take long for me to see that people did not understand this breed and soon after that recognized that most Americans don't understand their pets in general and don't care to learn either. Then when my vet suggested that I list myself as a rescuer I was surprised to hear of such a thing, but did so immediately.
     Within a month, I was getting calls 2 times a week for people who wanted to get rid of their Dalmatians. Since I was living in a one bedroom condo, that was not possible, but I was willing to go to their home and help them see their way through to having a dog very like mine. They even began to pay me for that. I thought it was a good way to make friends. Thus I formed California Canine College and appointed myself the Dean of Students. Tuition for your child included housing, all class time and food. It was very soon overwhelming, though. The surprising part was that I got a call from a woman named Carol Harris president of the southern Ca Dalmatian Breeders Club or something and she just questioned me, my knowledge of the breed, my tactics for placing the dals and ultimately at the end of the 90 minute phone call, said that she would do anything and everything possible to get me out of Dalmatian Rescue efforts because I was jeopardizing their very safety and existence with my ignorance of the breed. Most of all, her anger was due to my failure to bow down and salute at her presence. She was like that. I even went to a dog show once to meet some of the Dal people and although they were very nice, she was very rude and just told me to get the hell out of there. Now over the following three years, I was getting emails and phone calls from people telling me that at the beginning of every meeting, she would spend about 5 min at the start, by raking my name over the coals and placing the fear of God into the souls of all her members.
     Now mind you, I was not aware of any 'application process' or hiring that was required, as the efforts of rescuers all over the world is totally volunteer. I was simply helping these animals to find a better home the second time around. Never took money for that. So what's the problem? Well, you see, it was Carol's 'domain of power' and her two cohorts in crime, Connie Light and Carol Herboldt both did their fair share of slamming my name and spreading rumors and lies as well. ( all three ladies have since passed away) Just a trio of 'lovely women'. The contract that I had, (which although most rescuers do have contracts - they fail to enforce them) was simple. Feed your dogs ''this'', allow them to sleep inside the house at night and a limited number of other things including the fact that if I ever had proof that these were being broken, I could come and remove the dog from their home. There were several occasions when I would pass by an adoptees' home and find the dog tied to a post at 9:30 at night while the family was inside watching TV.
     As you can expect, when I approached the residents to take the dog, they would slam the door in my face, come at me with a baseball bat or even worse. I would then call the police and explain the situation and they would usually tell me that is a civil matter and they could do nothing. My reply to them was '' Well, being the peace officers you are, you can either come now and prevent a massive battle from developing or you can come in 20 minutes when the neighbors begin reporting several people fighting violently out into the streets." They were always there in short order. Thanks to the contents and signature on the contract I presented, they would allow me to take possession of the dog and suggest the homeowner sue me if they felt I had overstepped my bounds. Nobody ever did. Having already experienced many news articles and TV news features in L.A.
     At times, I would receive calls from 'anonymous sources telling me that their neighbors had a Dalmatian that was being mistreated or in one occasion, neglected. This family in Newport Beach had gone on vacation and tied their dal to a tree. After receiving many inches of rain and them extending their vacation for another 10 days, I arrived at the home, with the neighbors there to guide me and the poor dog was soaking wet, his food all floating in the rain water and he just jumped into my arms with glee. We named him Lightning and he was a phenomenal dog. He'd not had any love or attention in his short life and was grateful to be treated with love and respect. The neighbors all called once I returned home to thank me.
          So many times I drove past that home and had I ever seen anyone home, I would have stopped in to tell them what I thought of them and exactly what I did. I would receive some of the most ignorant calls you could imagine. ''I have a litter of puppies that you have to take - we don't want them'' and then demand that I pay them $50 each. When asked why they didn't have their two dogs spayed and neutered, their reply was ''Well, we got brother and sister and didn't think they could get pregnant." I always wondered, with a stupid comment like that if they had ever checked their own family tree.
     More than once I received a call from women who would cry and cry about how they hated to part with their beloved dog, but that their decorator had insisted they change the color scheme in the living room to earth tones and that the Dalmatians no longer matched. ''We've already adopted two cocker spaniels and the Dalmatians must go".''Has anyone ever called you a bitch"? and then, out of the clear blue sky, they would become angry. Go figure. Then the most common is how they hated to loose their wonderful pet, but were moving into a place that didn't accept dogs. They why would you move into a place like that? Trust me, with California being one of the most difficult places to rent with a pet, I was always able to rent EVEN THOUGH they knew I did rescue and would come with my two plus the occasional 2-3 extras until they found homes.
     So, renting, although more difficult to find, is certainly an option. One young man who had adopted a Dalmatian from me called and said he was getting 'some difficult reactions' from Ms. Harris and Ms. Herboldt due to the fact that his family had spent some enormous amount of money on one of her prime championship breeding puppies from her several months earlier and then he and his family had recently adopted one of my available rescue dogs. her comment was 'You put that low life dog pound trash with my championship puppy????? And followed up with threats to sue them and take the dog away. Hard feelings all around ensued. But the young man came down with his two dogs one evening so all the dogs could play.

Living in San Juan Capistrano at the time, we sat around and talked while the dogs played. Then we walked all the way to the beach with them and let them get wet and walked home. After arriving home, I continued to work on refinishing a desk I had started. The young man watched me in the garage as he sat in the yard with all the dogs and we still continued to talk. At 12:30pm a Costa Mesa Police car showed up into my driveway and from the back seat emerged Carol Harris and the young man's parents. (by the way, the guy was 21, graduated college and was NOT out after curfew) The Problem of his having her championship dog in the same home as a damn dirty rescue dog ESPECIALLY ONE THAT THAT RANDY WARNER PLACED WITH YOU was still not resolved, but on this particular evening, he had been scheduled to go to Carols' house for some show training and failed to appear. When she found out where he had gone and that he had taken BOTH dogs down to my house, she began to scream at the parents ''YOU DO KNOW THAT RANDY WARNER IS GAY DON'T YOU???? HE'S BEEN IN JAIL BEFORE. WHY, RIGHT THIS VERY MINUTE HE'S PROBABLY GOT YOUR YOUNG INNOCENT SON TIED AND GAGGED AND BENT OVER A BARREL WHILE WHO KNOW 'S WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE POOR DOGS.
     After several irate and frightening calls to the parents, they felt they should be erring on the side of caution and agreed to come down to my home. That still wasn't satisfactory to Carol. She actually put in a report of a missing boy at the hands of a sexual deviant and convinced the Costa Mesa police (30 miles away) that they absolutely must go down there so they could catch me in the act and save the man's life. When they pulled into the driveway, all four dogs were laying down beside him after a lot of fun that afternoon and evening. He and I nearly 30 feet apart and were exchanging smart remarks and jabs and laughing as the police car pulled in. Ms. Harris got out of the back seat of the police car and didn't know quite what to say. Dogs are more than fine and the young man is safe and obviously sticking around at his own will. His parents were not completely surprised and took me aside and said that they truly didn't wish to come to my home - especially this way. The son was MORTIFIED. Very angry at Carol and somewhat embarrassed at the actions of his parents that really embarrassed him that evening. As time progressed, he and I lost touch. But I spoke to his sister several years later. She had taken my rescue dog and he had kept the show dog to avoid legal action by Carol. Throughout this period of years, the media just found a story in my efforts somehow and began doing stories on me in LA Times, several smaller local papers and even on the Los Angeles TV News several times. This did not sit well with Queen Carol and her court. After all, they had done this longer and placed more dogs that I had, so why in the world would they dig my ass out of the gutter and make me look like a good person. In time, I began to have little respect for any of the Dalmatian rescue people because they would all rather jump on the bandwagon to fault me and paint my efforts in an unflattering light because they were all followers. They had no choice but to follow Carol Harris. She was a bully. When visiting a dog park the following year, a woman approached our group of Dalmatian owners to inform us that Carol Harris had died. Since I was the only one who had really met her, the rest did know who she was , I got up on the table and danced a to a chorus of 'Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead”. The bickering and backstabbing has become so outrageously vicious and time consuming among the nation's rescuers that I hesitate to say that the internet has actually harmed their otherwise noble efforts. My goodness, the damage that they can do to each other!!!!!!

I've gotten caught up with organizations such as Bear Mountain Dog Rescue in Big Bear CA where the woman, Myriam Mourani had formed a fake dog rescue, but allowed all her 'exhibit' dogs to suffer tremendously using the excuse that she didn't have the funds to help them, but still refused to allow others to visit her facility to help out. Dogs dying of rattle snake bites, lack of food and water and animal control only happened to visit when the containers were full so never wrote her up. Rescues from all over were trying to offer help in an effort to get in and help to close her down and save the remaining animals. She just exploded when they wanted to know what was going on.
     The caretaker she hired was a heroine addict and had muscular dystrophy and couldn't even leave his trailer. Was also forced to use the bathroom outside with no plumbing or portable facilities. He died there of an overdose and was found 3 days later - leaving all her dogs in the desert and unattended for several days since she never went to the facility at all.
     Financial discretions began to surface from all parts of southern CA. After many complained to authorities, they charged her with scamming senior citizens out of millions of dollars and spending it on 'stuff'. Breast enlargement, paying off her divorce attorney, flying her boyfriend to Tahiti - all the money was donated to her to save her animals. The court ruled that she could have no further involvement in non profits or animal related activities and to sell her sanctuary. She did none of that and is still operating the facility with 5 or 6 dogs and never missed a step. I testified on behalf of the US Postal authorities for fraudulent mailings as well as the State Atty General's office for much misconduct I'd presented evidence against the legitimacy of her claims.
     Henry County Kentucky's judges brought high school students to the local dog pound to shoot them for $3/hr. they weren't a very good shot because for years, locals near the dump site complained that they were kept awake due to animals crying all night long that were not yet dead.          

The judges did nothing until Dateline came out to do a story. Hurray for the two men who secretly video taped this horrific crime. In addition to this, throughout the rescue world, the bickering, finger pointing, backstabbing and slanderous remarks against each other is to a level of disbelief. They never have solid information, but only hearsay from those who they just slammed and belittled the week prior. It's more of a game for positioning to all of them than an effort to save the animals.Here is an article regarding the Las Vegas groups that appeared in AR-NEWS in 2003:
LAS VEGAS MAKES CONSCIOUS DECISION TO KILL MORE ANIMALS THAN OTHER CITIES IT'S SIZE.
     Lives, nor even the safety of innocent animals fall short of the almighty dollar. "Oh, Praise Mary Hero Almighty" or so she demands anyway. TO: The Las Vegas Media Community and Residents It's not likely that many of you who live in the Vegas area will ever see this or have a single idea that this huge scandal exists and is continuing in your community. As in all crime stories, there is a 'boss' and the 'triggerman' or in this case 'trigger woman'. Janie Greenspun will play the part of the 'boss' here and her 'trigger woman' will be known as Mary Hero who made her millions from the Animal foundation. These two women are about to launch yet another campaign to raise millions off the backs of dying innocent animals through deceitful and highly questionable fundraising practices they've made so much money from over the years right under your noses.     

It seems as though using the poor animals to raise funds for their luxurious homes and lifestyles isn't enough. Since the mainstream public in Las Vegas has no time to find out the facts, the two women are now the likely candidate to receive the County's animal control contract in 2005 issued by the Clarke County Supervisors - worth $millions - yes, the same ones who are under investigation by the FBI on several illegal dealings and operations they have been involved with, USING YOUR TAX MONEY!!

One would quickly assume that the entire group is somehow involved in undermining the reputation as well as the operations of the city. The Clark County board of supervisors is likely to award the contract for animal control to her in 2005. There are other qualified entities in Clark County who would be much more suitable for this contract, but until the public realizes that the problems that the animal facilities face is actually the fault of the community at large, the awarding of this contract seems to be a given. The county refuses to budget appropriately and nobody receiving this contract will be able to make the appropriate changes that make the difference until the community is made aware of who is actually running the majority of the animal orgs and learn to make necessary changes in their lives as well.

The simple fact that they have spent so much time in pointing fingers and accusing others of so many things, proves three things: 1.these two women do NOT hold the safety and welfare of the animals in the highest esteem and would rather divert the public's attention away from what is really going on , 2. they forget what they are 'supposedly' accepting the money to accomplish - as if there just aren't enough animals to help, so they use extra time and money to make this a competition, and 3. the community is quite unaware that they are being 'taken' in this game they play. NOBODY WINS, but the animals really loose. Now, it's not the millions of dollars they've made from running the Animal Foundation for so many years. Anyone who can solve these problems in a community or our nation should be made a billionaire on the spot. But the animal problems continue in Clarke County. This type of bickering leaves the good people who actually try to help the animals, to fend for themselves and eat off the bottom of the barrel. They are the ones who will really make a difference, but are pushed aside and forced to close. Janie, the 'boss' is known to sue anyone who just might stand up and look as if they may be pointing a finger at her. Many even suggest fear of personal injury or harm to themselves, by Mary Hero and her daughter, should they speak out.
     One who is actually being the complete opposite of a caring individual is most appropriate to describe Ms. Greenspun. Finally, one who needs to be exposed and stopped. The attempted ouster of Hero came last summer just a few weeks after the entire management team of the Lied Animal Shelter from 2001-2002 called for Mary Herro's removal as president. This team included two veterinarians, and three managers, and the former director of operations there.. They all stood together to blow the whistle on the fraud and mass killing at the Lied Animal Shelter, particularly after Mary reinstated her horrible daughter Stacy as the manager of the shelter. The result? More than 800 killings in just one month -- June of 2002!! (The board did demand and receive Stacy's dismissal.) Meanwhile, they raise money and hold themselves out as a no-kill sanctuary.
     This, while animals are slaughtered just for having ringworm or kennel cough, or are killed in mass numbers out of Lost & Found - never even making it to adoptions - if considered old, ugly, or otherwise chosen for death. In addition, many know that the Animal Foundation failed its two audits by the city (one in 1998, the other in 2001). So, hundreds of thousands of animals are now poised to head to the notorious Animal Foundation over the next several years to come. The Foundation has sued many of its most vocal critics, and the Nevada SPCA and others, hoping to bankrupt everyone who dare stand in their way and squash our voices in favor of humane care for animals. The suit is completely malicious, and we're still considering actions we'll take against the Foundation for filing the SLAPP Suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation). In March, in a very high profile case locally, the Foundation mistakenly and needlessly euthanized a family's sweet dog. You can probably review this coverage by searching www.lvrj.com under "Murrieta" and "Animal Foundation." They admitted it was their fifth mistaken euthanasia in just 30 days or so! The next step in this sad story comes June 23rd at the meeting of the county's Animal Advisory Committee which will review the county's proposed contract with the Foundation. The committee does not appear to be an independent one -- it has never seemed to oppose the head of county animal control, who is apparently instrumental in getting them appointed. So, there's virtually no hope that the committee will do much of anything but rubber-stamp the proposed contract. Then, the county commission can race the contract through this summer while it hopes most people aren't paying attention!      The very least that Greenspun and Hero could do is to take their 'hard-earned' monies they have stolen and apply it towards some humane education in the local schools. The entire valley could use education on humane issues, stricter laws for backyard breeders who are the single largest contributing factor, and more low cost spay neuter clinics. Those students who have completed a fact-based, aggressive humane education courses which range from 3-5 hours per school year by volunteers, actually have a higher grade point average, develop less violent resolution techniques, improved attendance and much more responsible behavior than their parents.
     Children would learn that, in order to reduce taxes, reduce the number of unwanted pets and killings that accompany them, eliminate the platform for unscrupulous business people who gain from the problems and to have a more compassionate community - even society, you must begin teaching humane education in the schools so they can make the correct decisions to do it right in the first place. It would be a sad legacy to leave the children of the Las Vegas area to have them and the rest of the nation and the world, see that Las Vegas feels that moral have no place in business. No doubt there is more to the story, but this is a start. This author suggests that all animal organizations in Las Vegas make a concerted effort to seeing humane education in the Clark County School System for one full year and leave the name of their orgs on the side line. Only the message to the young people has any value for this period of 365 days.
     Now, within the week after this article ran in AR _NEWS, it was also published in Las Vegas City Life. It was then that I began to receive calls from Greenspun supporters and even her daughter. Each one of them wanted to work their magic to convince me that I was wrong, but spent most of their time belittling all other groups, trying to defend their name and reputation. I also received a call from the Nevada SPCA - Doug is the supervisor there. Again, did not wish to speak of the issues that would clean up the mess but chose to spend his time belittling the other organizations and showing how they should be forced to close. The most interesting call I received was a conference call from the San Diego Area who had just recently hired Mary Hero's daughter just 3 months earlier, and with great regret, had just read my article. ''What would you suggest we do Mr. Warner? We've not had any adoptions during her reign here and ended up killing over 1,000. She refuses to allow anyone into the facility for adoptions claiming she has to clean up ''our'' messes.' I told them to hang up the phone and call the police and get a restraining order against her returning to the facility ever again. When I brought up the idea of merging together in order to present a unified front for humane education, none of the three entities who called wanted to listen to the idea, but to make sure that I was aware that they had already begun a program like this. The AF response, "Mr. Warner, I'll have you know we do already have a very substantial humane education program for the schools in place and we're working on limited funds." Knowing that they had just recently received a grant specifically for humane education in the amount of $50,000, I asked her to explain. ''We spent three full days with two of our volunteers in the local school for the mentally challenged''. Then there was a pause and I finally broke in to ask '' And what happened to the remaining 278,000 students in the Clark County School System? Is that what you plan to spend the $50,000 on?'' Her answer? ''Mr. Warner, you obviously don't understand how to get these programs implemented into a classroom. That money is long gone and we spent it wisely." So, 3 days in a classroom with 2 volunteers cost them $50,000? Of course when I reminded them that there were still 278,000 students who were unaccounted for in her humane education program, she hung up on me. There is a tremendous amount of money in animal protection movement. People can see with their own eyes all the animals that are being saved.
     Not nearly as many people have the vision towards education. That is clearly why it is not being followed up on, nor why the funding is not there. The general public cannot 'see '' it. Each one was determined to convince me that they were the only ones that mattered and the other one was completely wrong. Hero has been fired and then rehired several times over the years. She has enough money saved from her time heading up the AF that she can bring attorneys to her defense at the drop of a hat. The very first call I received was from Mr. Brown, an attorney who spent an hour and a half questioning my involvement with other groups. The end result was that each and every representative from the various organizations I spoke to was determined to convince me why they 'CAN'T' work together on such an effort as opposed to any of them listening to the project outline or trying to view a unified front. Each one also determined to convince me that their organization should be the only one who should be respected and allowed to continue. Have they all failed to help the animals? I would have to say in this particular community - one with an exploding population, an absolute YES! Absolute Power corrupts, absolutely!!!
     Compare this to Flagstaff AZ where each and every one of the animal organizations work together to support the other. When a community event takes place they all attend and anxiously listen to the success stories of the others. When the occasions arise where one or more are unable to attend a given event, the others take it upon themselves to include flyers and info regarding the missing groups, to ensure their 'presence' for that event. It comes back to the end result of everyone working together to help the animals. Politics is a natural means of positioning in all walks of life. However, it kills animals. For those of you who find this odd and out of place from what you assumed about the rescue world, please read the following. It was written by a fellow rescuer out of Colorado and is so very appropriate to this part of the entire story.
Saddened By Today's Rescue Efforts
     I am saddened to see a disturbing trend that Animal Rescue people around the country can become entrenched in the political and personality conflicts that seems to defeat the whole purpose of rescuing those more defenseless then ourselves. I'm sure this is nothing new, however it's something that need's to become extinct. It appears to me that by the very nature of the work we do, trying to save as many animals as we can, we can become lost in the concept that ONLY *I* can do the job right. Instead of noting how much someone IS doing we feel the need to point out the things that they aren't doing, or that we might do differently. Unfortunately that is the very disease that corrupts the foundation of Animal Rescue. It is easy to become so focused on the bad things that we see, we forget about the good things we see. This continuous negativity, can strangle the roots of any rescue organization and cause irreparable damage. When time and energy is spent focusing on personality conflicts and intolerance of other methods that might not exactly match our own, it takes that much time and energy away from the business of saving animals. In a perfect world all VOLUNTEERS would have 28 hours a day to dedicate to the animal rescue work that they do.     

Everyone would agree on training methods, care protocols, and placement standards. Each foster would have enough room to house all their foster animals in a home atmosphere instead of a kennel, the rescue organization would have enough money to furnish the best food, treats, and absolute maximum suggested veterinary care available. But alas, this is not a perfect world. Rescue VOLUNTEERS juggle jobs, family, their own pets, medical issues, personal problems, AND their volunteer work. Standards shift, beliefs and ideals may clash with others, but I choose to believe that each VOLUNTEER is doing everything THEY believe they can to help the organization. And I haven't walked in their shoes. I don't know what bills they can and cannot pay, at fights they may be having with family and friends. I don't know how many hours they already dedicate to Rescue so I shouldn't judge what they do give. Today as I sit at work, juggling Animal Rescue calls about various issues, this whole struggle sinks home.
     Would I be appreciated for the things I had done, the accomplishments I had achieved, for the effort I made, or would I be criticized for my methods, judged by all that was left to be done? In this electronic, fast past, hectic world I believe we have at times lost sight of the very foundation of "good will to man". We have forgotten, or don't have time to remember, that, caring, compassion, and kindness are the very foundations of what Animal Rescues are based on. So the next time we are prone to criticizes someone else's job, point out their flaws or faults, discourage someone else's efforts because their methods don't match ours we need to stop.

We need to consider their efforts. We need to praise and acknowledge the good they ARE doing. If we want to save animals we have to save ourselves from each other first. Otherwise we lose the very people who are willing and able to help us accomplish our goals. We need to stop jumping to conclusions and attacking each other before we discover the facts and consider all options and beliefs. Our methods may be different, our standards may not be identical, but our goals are the same. Words can hurt, they do cause pain, they can scar, and they can cause retreat, flight, and failure. Or they can cause hope, they can cause accomplishments, they can cause change and success. We decide which by our actions, our tolerance, and our understanding. Are we going to work to our maximum potential or are we going to get lost in the struggles of politics and egos? And who suffers the most when we are lost? Some thoughts to ponder. A Concerned Rescuer in America
     Yes, we are all guilty of not doing enough and not embracing changes that could benefit the animals. Should rescuers be doing more to bring forth humane education in their communities? To answer the question, I would say an emphatic YES!! There is no other group of people who devote more time, effort, compassion or personal finances into a job or hobby than do most rescuers. But, educating just one family at a time, as opposed to 50 families at a time is obviously not as productive. And lets face it. Trying to convince an adult to change their ways of handling and caring for their pets is about as successful as convincing your spouse you are ‘right’ during an argument. Rescuers are concerned with education, they just don’t know it. Should Rescuers be considered humane educators as well? They ARE! Sometimes they just don’t know it. They speak from the front lines of the dog and cat rescue battles. Rescuers have the most, as well as the best, information regarding pets and their unique stories, along with the reasons why....Rescue is a passion-driven field. Logic and business sense are frequently put on hold because some little angel needs some extra care today. I mean, it's not like your profit margins are going to be factored by investors on Monday, right? Now, I'm quite sure that accomplishing an education effort takes different strategies than what most of the public assumes, but I believe it can be done. Not everyone will agree, not everyone will wish to participate, but at the very least, nearly everyone can read this and think about it. From 1985 ‘til now I’ve done rescue primarily for Dalmatians—and others when needed. I know how difficult it is, how expensive it is, to what extent you can be drawn into an effort that never seems to end. It's the ''never seems to end'' part that I want to ask YOU about. I'm addressing this to all those who devote their valuable and wonderful time and assets toward saving dogs' lives, the rescuer. I have a challenge for you…I’d like to suggest that you give 20% of your time, efforts and money to getting a strong and substantial humane education program into your area schools. I do not mean to infer that your present efforts are not necessary or important. I know it is crucial to so many animals’ lives to continue what you’re doing.
     But, that being said, if you ONLY do rescue, you are simply making it easier for those who are borderline about keeping their pets, and you are also assuring that your children’s generation and your grandchildren’s generation will be forced to do the same level of rescue as you do now. You must do everything you can to educate this younger group of people before they head down the very same path as their parents. Each and every one of you has the knowledge, experience, compassion and everything else needed to make a HUGE difference in the next generation!!! You can't do it by saying "I don't have time" or offering other excuses. Spending 100% of your available time rescuing simply puts all future dogs in jeopardy, because you did NOT do enough to resolve the underlying problems for the future. You will continue to clean up the mess after yesterday’s parade. I would hope that you would rather see the front of the horse once in a while. If you are willing to work toward this momentous effort, I don’t want you to be overwhelmed. Try 5% per year for humane education over the next five years and increase accordingly. Some of you are not comfortable as public speakers. If that is the case, consider recruiting a friend or neighbor who supports your efforts and wants to do more. Many schools (even in this economy) have ''speaker'' funds and will write you a check for $100 as you leave. You could bring in as much as $500/week for 5 hours’ work. We all know how helpful money is in our pocket. Why not earn money for our rescue endeavors while we spread the message to make rescue unnecessary? As a rescuer, you can send information to schools of your choice and follow up to see which class got that information. What if you spent only one hour a weekend handing out information to the public? Minimal cost for copies, countless contacts to pet owners!  If you have a website, place some information there as well. One more link about the overpopulation and how people can help end it will not take too much effort, but will save lives in the end!
     Everything I have on my site is for public use. The more people that check out my site, the more their awareness and information levels increase, thus they act more responsibly. If you don’t have the time for another page, PUT A LINK TO MY PAGE ON YOUR PAGE! Everything on my site will resound loudly in the ears of anyone who has helped with rescue and listening to the idiots make up excuses for these poor innocent pets. Some principals tell me that I’m not needed at their school, because most of their students already have pets. WELL, A BIG STUPID DUH TO THEM!! But once I’m invited into a school, you would not believe the impact that my 45-minute program has on these young minds. I take all five of my dogs: 2 dals, (one deaf) a coyote, a pit bull and a beagle-basset mix. My presentation is blunt, direct, fun, AND VERY INFORMATIVE. I barely mention what they think they'll hear. When we depart, each face looks so much different from when we first arrived. It’s amazing. The kids are motivated to form a humane education club or at least take on a year long project to accomplish something to help animals. Amazingly, teachers and staff tell me how much even they learned and then thank me. You need to be well versed in supportive information to check all claims, suggestions and rules enforced in contracts. I'll bet every rescuer out there knows exactly what I'm talking about. I just hope that some of you see that we all have room for growth, change and expansion of our duties. If we are creative, we can accomplish so much more. If only 20% of the rescuers who read this decide to do SOMETHING, that would be over a thousand people. Now, a thousand people visiting schools just 3 times a year is 3,000 MORE classrooms visited. 3,000 classrooms this year with 40 students each is 120,000 EDUCATED youth who will not likely need to services of rescuers or animal control agencies except for adoptions. Then, I've surpassed my goal considerably!!
     For all those who say 'we can't' for whatever reason, would you rather be part of the Rescue Janitorial staff than the Engineering or Research Departments who will be a vital part of the solution? When you pass on, can you guarantee that someone similar will step into your shoes and take over with the same fervor and compassion to save the dogs of tomorrow?? Wouldn't you like to try and save some of them NOW while you can? With every good presentation you give, you are likely to save 10-50 dogs depending on the number of ears listening. And it only takes an hour and maybe $15. (gas, 50 copies and lunch at McDonalds on the way home) CAN YOU MEET THE CHALLENGE OF EDUCATION TO CREATE PROBLEM RESOLUTION? I would love nothing more than NOT to do rescue because it is not necessary. Until then, I will continue along my path of education for solution. I choose to be pro-active to end overpopulation, not just re-active to current demands. “I am only one, but still I am one. I cannot do everything, but still I can do something; and because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do something that I can do.” I would suggest to those who continue with rescue, to WORK SMART, NOT HARD
     An article on 'Backyard Breeders' that I wrote in 1999 for a local paper which had begun stressing overpopulation and was receiving much scrutiny and anger from the locals: AMERICANS WILL KILL UPWARDS OF 8 MILLION HEALTHY, ADOPTABLE PETS THIS YEAR. WHY? TOO MANY PETS – NOT ENOUGH HOMES! WHO IS AT FAULT? ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO HAS A LITTER FOR FUN, FOR PROFIT, OR “BY ACCIDENT’’! THE ‘’BACKYARD BREEDER’’ Backyard Breeders misrepresent themselves as responsible/respectable breeders. They have the misguided thoughts that AKC papers means their pet is breeding quality. If you allow your pet to parent even one litter, then YOU are the solutions’ BIGGEST problem! Unless you honestly don't know how dogs become pregnant or are just retarded, there is no such thing as an accidental litter. Most Americans tend to view the problems of animal abuse and pet overpopulation from the same vantage point.  We certainly hope you don't see yourself in this photo.
     I foster, rehabilitate and place rescued dogs of many breeds. Dalmatians are one of my specialty breeds but I also rescue, train and foster many others as well. Because of this, I WANT to speak out today on the issue of breeding for fun and profit. Some of you will be upset by this written piece and that is good, maybe you'll help us do something about the problem. For, each person who throws their arms in the air, or rolls their eyes in disgust for something I’ve said in this piece, you are the likely intended target. For verification on anything I say on this page, ask ANY person associated with an animal welfare group or facility – ANYWHERE. BACKYARD BREEDERS ARE -
**Anyone who has a litter for fun, profit or by ‘accident’.
**Anyone who is so uninformed that they think having AKC papers means that their pet is breeding quality.
**Anyone who advertises their litters in the local paper for sale. (respected breeders only advertise in trade magazines)
**Anyone who thinks that by finding their puppies good homes that they somehow don’t have to play by the rules or take responsibility.
**Anyone who thinks they found their litter good homes, simply because everyone that took one, smiled honestly and ‘promised’ to treat them well.. Thus insisting on no background check, no enforceable contract or any type of follow up.
**They will provide erroneous information to the potential adopters regarding the required care and treatment necessary for the pet - simply for their own personal gains. Respectable breeders will have walls adorned with trophies and certificates which represent the numerous championships they’ve acquired over the years.
     If you take personal offense to it then you need to examine your activities very carefully as you are likely my target or reason for writing this. If you wish to respond negatively to this, you will find you won't get much support from myself or those who are knowledgeable. I am speaking OUT today, not only for myself, but also for all rescuers across the nation, all of the ‘respectable’ breeders around the country and all of the responsible pet guardians. Therefore, I will not say, "In my humble opinion", as this opinion is shared by the respected breeders and pet guardians, as well as the ASPCA, Humane Society of the United States and all of the Shelters and other Humane/Animal Welfare organizations in this country. Up to 8 million healthy animals are killed in U.S. pounds and shelters every year. The majority of killing could easily be prevented by spaying OR neutering. Euthanasia is the single largest cause of death for dogs in the U.S. Each year 27 million DOGS are born. 8 or more million we classify as "surplus" ARE killed. That's about ¾ million per month. These numbers do not include the millions of dead dogs whose bodies we scrape off the streets, the growing number that are put to sleep at vets’ offices or the hundreds of thousands THAT ARE abandoned. LET'S NOT FORGET THE severely neglected or abused ones who never make it to our shelters to be counted and OR EUTHANIZED. The eight million figure represents those we "MUST" kill because they are unwanted!!! Most of these animals are young and healthy; in fact, it is estimated that a majority are less than one year of age. The problem is simple: we have too many dogs...Too many for the too few homes available TO THEM. The solution we have opted for is to kill the extras. This solution has been considered acceptable by default, as though there were no other way to control the crisis. And we spend over $2 billion every year destroying "man's best friend."
     A common sense look that you cannot deny or argue with: If you were part of a company who made ‘pets’ and every year for the past 20 years, you had been overstocked to the point of having to dispose of the overstocked inventory, what would you suggest they do this year to improve? So, if you KNOW we are killing this vast number of innocent, loving animals each year, why in the world would you think that having a litter of puppies or kittens is OK? Why is this happening in the United States today?

The number one biggest contributor to the problem is the "backyard breeder" not the puppy mills. This is a name that has become unpopular and no one wants to admit they are a "backyard breeder". Anyone having a litter in their home with just the family pet as one of the breeding parents, and advertise in the local papers) Many people do not even realize they are part of the problem. This is what I need to address in this post. The only way to stop the needless killing of dogs is to stop the needless breeding of them. Every breed of dog recognized by the AKC has a written standard, a blueprint of what the dog should look like and act like. These standards were written so that all would know what a quality example of the breed is and strive to produce dogs that meet or exceed the standard in health, temperament and appearance.

To be sure you are breeding dogs that meet these standards, your dogs must be judged by people who have a lifetime of experience among the breed. If your personal dog has not yet been in front of a judge, then you do NOT have an AKC standard dog, you have one that is pet quality and that is fine. AKC papers DO NOT signify a dog with Breeding quality standards!!!!!. A pet is to be loved, cherished, trained, cared for, spoiled and bragged about, but it is NEVER to be bred. No matter how cute or sweet the dog may be, if it is not up to the standard, you have no business breeding it.

Even if you have a purebred dog this does not give you the right to breed it. Most purebred dogs are not breeding quality. If you breed your pet quality dog, you are a "backyard breeder", whether you breed the dog in your backyard, garage, living room or an expensive hotel room, the term is still backyard breeder. If your pet quality dog has AKC papers, that's nice but it doesn't change anything. You still don't have the right to breed it. If your pet quality dog cost you $500 be glad you had the money to afford it. You still have no right to breed it. Do you think you can RECOUP your $500 INVESTMENT if you breed your pet dog? OR DO YOU THINK YOUR pet dog is a color or size that isn't in the standard but you just know everyone will want buy a pup if you breed her? Shame on you! Now you are a "backyard breeder" with the purpose of breeding pups for fun and profit. That is despicable!!! 

If the price for a tail dock or an ear crop seems high to you, what are you going to do when your beloved pet needs an emergency C-section? Will you even be there to know if she is in trouble? Would you recognize trouble before its too late AND BE MONETARILY ABLE TO SEEK VETERINARY HELP? If you still want to breed your pet but need to ask, "Who's suppose to cut off the tails and ears"? Ask yourself, "What the Hell am I thinking?"

Do you think genetic testing is something they used in the OJ trial but has nothing to do with your dog-breeding career you are a "backyard breeder". Backyard breeders sell pups that aren't up to the standard of the breed. They do this for many reasons. None are good enough reasons to contribute to the killing of dogs. Period. "Backyard breeders" will swear all of their pups went to a good home. They believe this, but it's not NECESSARILY true. Some may have been lucky enough to go to a good home at the time of adoption, but more than half of them will end up dead, in a shelter alone, on a cold table with a needle sticking out of their leg. Why? Because the Backyard Breeder didn’t follow through or even know enough about adoptions to ask the right questions up front. Some of those good homes will get tired of the dog and they will just give it away to anyone who is willing to take it.

Some of your beloved dog's children will end up living alone in a backyard, barking all night, cold and neglected until the guardian gets complaints and then that pups will be dead. Some will be starved and beaten. Some will be bred until they die from THE MANY BIRTHS.

Some will end up in rescue and I will have to find space for it in my home. I will GIVE IT LOVE TO SHOW IT that not all humans are bad. I will train it, and feed it the proper food so it can heal, MENTALLY AS WELL AS PHYSICALLY. I will take the fleas off and I will get rid of the worms. I will give it the shots it should have had but no one remember to DO it. I will do these things because the "backyard breeder" didn't. I will spay or neuter that pup before I find it a new home so that I will never have to rescue one of it's pups. THAT WAY I CAN BE ASSURED it will never end up in the hands of another "backyard breeder" looking to make profit from puppies.

"Backyard breeders" are not responsible pet guardians. They claim that they love the dogs but it's not true because they don't really want to be bothered with doing all that it takes to breed ethically. They love feeling important when they say, "I breed mini schnauzers". But breeding pet dogs isn't something to be proud of. IT'S a shame on our society. It's the reason for the killing that goes on in shelters. Why do you want to be part of that? Do you want to be respected? Spay or neuter you pet dog. There's really no other way. The kind of homes you want for your pet pups don't want to buy from you. They are looking for responsible, respected breeders who are doing something for the breed as a whole.

Most of those WHO WILL BUY your pups are the kind of people I wouldn't give a dog I didn't like to. They are the ones who will turn your puppy into a shelter when the novelty wears off. That's a PROVEN fact. Want to stop the problem of killing 1 Million dogs a month all over America? Spay or neuter your pet dog now and tell everyone you know to do the same. Leave the breeding to the people who are doing something to better the breed. DO you want to have a litter of puppies to show your children the miracle of life? Then to be fair and honest, volunteer yourself and your children to work at the county dog pound for no less than three days to show them the miracle of death. After all, as a 'backyard breeder' you are now the single most contributing factor to the pet overpopulation problems that we all face and which cause the millions of healthy pets to be killed each year in this nation.



     Jail Time: Yes I spent time in jail trying to make my point and rightfully so. Most of the time I seemed to have problems staying out of trouble with the top level animal control officials. At the same time, when the field officers would come to my home, at the direction of their superiors, they not only sympathized with what I was doing, she also very supportive of my efforts and did what they could to keep me out of trouble. A knock on the door by the officer only to see my home and yard busy with activity from the number of Dalmatians in my care. Happy, healthy and bothering nobody.

Seeing as though the limit was 3, I usually had 8-10 in the earlier years. The officer would say with a wink, "I only see three Dalmatians today, don't I?' and then step inside with a pint of Cherry Vanilla Ice Cream and ask me to get two spoons. In one community they would pay the animal control officer overtime to sit and wait for me to come home in the evening so he could actually write me a ticket for having too many animals with me. One time, I was walking them all to the store and Maddy was off leash and he gave me a ticket for dog at large. That was the first time I went to jail, but was released as soon as they had my finger prints and mug shot.

One time I was taken to jail was when Orange County was tired of giving warnings of my having too many dogs in my one bedroom condo at the beach. Sometimes as many as seven. But we would go on a morning walk, spend a solid three hours each day at a different doggy park and then go to the beach at sunset. They were not 'wanting' for anything. AND NO NEIGHBORS HAD COMPLAINED EITHER. My limit was ten dogs. Never any more. And on the same day, the orange county pound called and said they had two Dalmatians for me =- would I take them? I said yes. That would bring my number of dogs to 9.

Funny, how I arrived home to find two Dalmatians tied up to my front door with a small note saying they MUST go to me or be killed. Well, now I'm already over the limit that the county has placed on me. but who's going to find out this soon????? Within two or three hours of my returning, the sheriff was there and brought along 2 animal control trucks to remove the animals.
     I was forced to sit on my living room floor in handcuffs as the neighbors outside were screaming at the authorities to stop this nonsense because all I was doing was trying to help save lives. They finally had each and every dog loaded into the two trucks and proceeded to put me in the back of the sheriff's car. Instead of being released on OR as usual, they actually made me stay there until I saw the judge. They decided to play hardball. They made me see a judge up in Santa Ana who had no idea of who I was or what I'd been doing over the years. and saw how many citations I had been issued. He decided to throw me in jail for 30 days. Now mind you, I only stayed for 9, but I learned more about myself in those nine days that I had in the previous 42 years.
     I made the call to get a ride back home so I could see my two baby girls that I loved so dearly. The other 9 dogs had all been killed immediately upon arrival at the shelter 9 days earlier. never had a chance. It had been a set up by the county animal control to catch me and so they would know exactly when I would in fact have more than they had set the limits at. I moved out of Orange County soon afterwards.

I was now making my living from training dogs and doing some boarding over holiday periods when other kennels were full. Now, I'm moving away from the beach which is highly populated and crowded to beautiful and very rural interior of Riverside County. Filled with rednecks in office. I'm thinking that some acreage in the country would be much more appropriate for my efforts. Everyone was hoping for a much calmer and more supportive lifestyle for my efforts.

I found my first place in the Ortega Mountains in a cool 2 bedroom A frame at the entrance of a state park and campground. What a dream location for this. It wasn't more than 3 months after moving in that the Press Enterprise asked to do a story on my efforts and placed the color photo and feature on the front page. The following day, I was visited by animal control to give me a citation. When I refused to sign it, they radioed for a sheriff to come and calm the situation. But, this is only the beginning of an unbelievable ride - one that would shed much light on the greed and ignorance within the animal control system around our nation and stems directly from the stupidity of many supervisory boards from given and various counties.

For the next three + years, I was being taken to court a total of 43 times. Each time was a different case, but all were exactly the same charge. An infraction with a max fine of $100 for not having a proper kennel license. Gaining unbelievable amounts of information from a variety of attorneys who offered to help pro bono, I was able to extend this case for the duration, only to be ultimately found not guilty. At a total cost to taxpayers of $60,000+ It was more than apparent that had the animal control been doing their job, there would be much less of a need for met to do what I was doing. For me to get a license, was acceptable at $260/yr. But to charge me nearly $10,000 in various fees just to get that license was what I was clearly protesting since I didn't have the money and not one red cent of that was to protect or ensure the animals safety or well being - it was just a 'law' that had too much government involvement.
     Keep in mind throughout the entire Riverside County fiasco, the ONLY thing that anyone was trying to rule on, was 'did Randy Warner have the proper license' and it was clear I did not have that, but they kept finding me not guilty or dismissing the case due to extenuating circumstances and clearly supported by the courts and especially the public and the media. During this period of time, I would appear in front of more than 35 judges for the exact same violation over and over again. When one judge would sympathies with my efforts and dismiss the case, the county would become more angered and outspoken. So the next judge, who would also be in a different part of the county at a different courthouse, was likely going to dismiss the charges as well. If not he/she would fine me and I'd then be forced to appeal the decision which ultimately lead to my being heard by yet another court which usually resulted in my being found not guilty each time. Usually within days, the brainiacs at Riverside County Animal Control then would send a field officer to issue yet another citation for the same.
     Here was the problem. In order to be granted this license, I had to have kennels constructed for the dogs that met their strict requirements. First of all, the dogs in my care were and are allowed to run freely within the confines of my securely fenced 1.75 acres. They learn to share the food from one single large feeder and drink from a large water bowl without fighting. They have unlimited play time, sleep under the oak tree or on my bed. This provides them with the future expectations once they find their 'forever' homes. I didn't want to build kennels. I was also not in a position of spending the $3,500 it would take to build them.

Also, my landlords would not have permitted me to do so as they didn't want to have their rental property resembling a dog pound for future renters, but fully supported my efforts as they were. To complicate this matter even further, the county would NOT allow me to build the kennels until the planning and zoning department did a study/survey on the land and would require a temporary use permit which would cost $6,000 also. The worst of the whole deal was that they fully expected, based on my numbers of dogs I usually cared for, that they would also require me to build handicapped parking and a handicapped bathroom as they would consider me to be operating as a business.

Other requirements were that I build a separate food preparation facility, which I could only assume was to be used for special occasions when I fed my dogs caviar and roasted duck. I was also expected to construct a separate septic system with underground tank for the animals' waste. Heaven forbid, their poop would ever be mixed with my poop. On my second appearance in the Perris courthouse, Judge Loree presided. As I approached the bench, (with the Press Enterprise and LA Times in the courtroom) the judge said, “I sure hope that you are not the famous Dalmatian man that I keep reading about in all the papers. is that you? When I replied with the affirmative, she looked upset. Then she announced that she and her husband had just discussed this over dinner the night before.
     She said 'clearly with my job in these courts, I feel you should be made a hero and not a criminal and could not be fair in this case. The county will now be forced to secure another venue for this trial if they choose to continue. And Mr. Warner, I respect your efforts. Thanks for what you do. The above photo of my home is an illegal act in Riverside County, CA. I was just stunned. I didn't know what had just happened. She said, 'You may go now' and I turned away to walk out.

As I exited the courtroom, the bailiff stopped me and gave me a five dollar bill to help out with the dog food and I broke out in tears. The media just ate this up. This was not the first time that a judge had respected my efforts and sympathized with what I was forced to do in order to be the law abiding rescue effort with that given county. Four years earlier in Orange County and appearing in court to answer to charges that were obviously trumped up just to make me look worse, the judge quickly recognized it and also dismissed the charges against me following some very stern words to animal control and a supportive nod in my direction. Also, during the midst of this 40 month battle, the new Heydn Bill was introduced and passed through the CA legislature.

This new law would force county and city funded animal facilities to make every attempt to work with their local breed rescues to find more homes for the animals in lieu of almost certain death. The animals would be required to be vaccinated and spayed and neutered prior to our acceptance of the animals - all at no charge to the rescuers. So, now the county was under pressure to abide by the law and allow me to adopt any Dalmatian within their care. They, of course refused to do so and I made that very clear in court as well. Throughout this 3 and 1/2 year battle of the wits and laws, the laws were so poorly written that even one judge dismissed the case because he knew nothing of it and the officer from the county couldn't provide any information. Now they have been made to look stupid in the media again and are getting angry.
     Two days later in an article in the Press Enterprise, the board of supervisors announced that they would be reviewing the judges decision and he would be placed on administrative leave for two days pending their decision. The next time I was taken to court I was told that the case would not continue until I had posted a bail f $243. Not a huge bale amount, but I don't have that kind of money - it all goes for dog food. And who in the world thinks I'm a flight risk? It became clear that the judge had received instructions from the county supervisors.

Now, keep in mind, this follows the other judge who knew nothing of the particular law and dismissed my case. This was their way to even the score. It was at this time that the Los Angeles Times deemed them the 'hillbilly mafia''.
     So, I was now forced to file a request for the courts to postpone my trial as I needed to raise the bail amount. Of course that also was covered in several newspapers and the funds came quickly. The one that brought me to tears was from Nancy and Zubin Mehta. Zubin is the conductor of the LA Philharmonic Orchestra and had asked his audience of that previous Friday night to pass the hat in an effort to help the man in Riverside County fighting for the lives of so many innocent animals. They sent a check for $2,450.

The judge hearing this particular case was expecting to preside over a routine case of someone with too many dogs. After hearing my defense, he also decided to dismiss the case due to the fact he found no justifiable actions to curb my efforts as there had never been any complaints and recognized the passion and defensive arguments for my efforts. By the time the court session was over, with a continuance, no action taken and several area media reporters present as well, he commented to one of the court employees '”I'd love to know the details of this case.' Then he remembered that he had barred several Los Angeles based TV crews from entering his court room, but now wondered if there could be any connection. He asked to speak to one of them still outside and figured out who I was.
     On a given afternoon in my mail, I see a citation from Orange County. why, I've not been to Orange county is over a year. It was a notice to appear due to the fact that I had violated my probation by breaking the law in Riverside County. Number one: Nobody follows through with a violation of an infraction. Number two: I'd yet to be found guilty on any one of them. Luckily for me, upon arrival at Orange county courts, I was fortunate enough to see Judge Pamela Aisles, who had been supportive of me into he past. She agreed that this was odd, couldn't understand how it came to the attention of the courts and promptly changed the probation from ''break no laws'' to ''abuse nor neglect any animals in your care''. Then she handed me the updated copy with a smile and wished me luck.
     Since that little tactic failed, I now find myself pulled over on the highway as I go to the grocery one day. I was placed in handcuffs and told by the officers that they really think this is an unfortunate argument between the county and myself as they quickly recognized me from all the coverage, but were instructed to bring me to jail for violation of a county ordinance that prohibits operation of a pig ranch within the city limits of an incorporated community. I have no pigs. I live nine miles outside the city limits on 1.75 acres. when arriving at the jail, the officer there, didn't quite know what to do. But he made sure my stay was as short as possible and got me out quickly. The media decided not to run this story and were beginning to side with me as was most of the public in the Los Angeles Basin of communities.
     This was just another attempt of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to levy fines and fees as well as charges of abusing the law in order to garner more support for finally receiving a guilty verdict against me in the future. Then, out of the clear blue sky, there was an article in the newspaper where the supervisors had approved stiffer penalties for those who keep more than Riverside County Law provides. Those who reviewed the new set of laws agreed they were much stricter, but argued that they were even less understandable than the original set. The laws never went into effect. Soon after that, in another failed attempt to justify their anger with my ongoing battle with them, they claimed that this would have to be resolved very soon as they just didn't have the funds to continue. In the same article, the reporter mentioned that the county had just recently reduced the budget for this growing county from 3% to just 1%.

Not surprising to anyone, was the fact that during the very same month, the county supervisors had just voted themselves an annual pay increase of 35%. Hmmm, I wonder where those funds came from? I then felt it necessary to question why the county is so eager to place so many financial obstacles in he paths of those who only rescue existing animals but have no program nor restrictions for those who breed for profit or allow for recreational litters. It doesn't make sense to me that they will allow any idiot to have litters, tie them upside down in the attic if they wish, paint them all purple, nor provide them with any vaccinations what so ever, but for those who try to assist in the ever growing problems of pet overpopulation, they require this, that and everything else in the world to attempt and prevent us from doing so.
 

The final battle:
     After one judge required me to post a bail of $243 (as if some idiot expected me to be a flight risk,) I was then forced to ask for a postponement of my next hearing so I could raise the funds. Since he set the following court date in a futile and final attempt to ultimately resolve this issue between the county and myself, he did in fact hear the final two days of testimony and trial. I would say this judge was undoubtedly the most stern of all the judges I'd had throughout this bitch fest, but saw his gasp when he looked at the photos and was quiet for a few moments. Then when he waived the fine so I could use it on my ''drug of choice'' (dog food for my rescues) I knew this would be a victory when it all came out in the wash.
     It was that evening when Jean Schmidt of Imperial County called me at home. She had been following the trials for over three years and happened to be a huge dog lover. Then she said 'oh, by the way, did I tell you that I'm also offering my services to make sure you are victorious in your battle. I'm a retired California Supreme Court Justice.” My mouth just dropped open and didn't really know what to say. She was a gruff and very short speaking type person. This was a cause that she supported wholeheartedly, but wasn't too pleased with my questioning her suggestions. She frequently hung up on me in disgust, but would always make her way to come to the phone the next time I called. Over the next few weeks she made me do some things that were rather on the odd side, but I did them and they all had a strong impact that helped with the case - none of which would I have ever thought of in a million years. One: Place an ad in the Press Enterprise that is 2” X 2” and has a border to make it visible. In the ad, you ask for any local or area gays and other minorities from the county who have experienced prejudicial treatment based on that fact and to call this special number that she had me set up. within 4 days, I had received over 70 calls from people all over the county who knew who I was and felt they too were discriminated against. I took their phone numbers and names but did little else, According to Jean, the damage had already been done. Just let them think that you are coming to court with all your guns and they will be loaded to the hilt.
     The next thing she made me do was to get a large 4ft square sign made out of poster board. Glue the photos of the Board of supervisors and the animal control supervisor to the poster. Each photo should be no smaller than 8'' X 8” so that they would be recognizable in a public area. he text should be this and nothing else: WHEN IS THE LAST TIME YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY CHARGED AND FINED WITH THEIR CRIMES OF SPOUSAL BATTERY, CHILD MOLESTATION OR ANIMAL ABUSE?
     She explained to me that with the question, I would likely be handcuffed and taken in, but that they would quickly realize that you can ask any question you wish. What this did was to place doubt and questions in the minds of the county residents, because it was so drastic, that the media was there in about 20 min and 2 min later, the cops had me in cuffs.
The following day it was on the front page of the Press Enterprise along with one of their 18 feature articles about my battle to save the poor Dalmatians. Funny thing is, some of those who read the sign, actually went to work checking up on the history of all those mentioned and found 2 domestic violence charges and one had a pending charge for inappropriate behavior with a minor. So it also had some very strong impacts on the trial outcome. Now, they just didn't know what to expect from this crazy man who loves his dogs. On two occasions, throughout this 3 + year battle, I personally and professionally addressed the Riverside County Board of supervisors and brought others who would also speak on my behalf. Our goal was to obtain a variance to allow me to obtain the license without constructing the kennels, the separate septic system, separate food preparation area and the handicapped parking and handicapped bathroom.
     I explained how I was physically not permitted to construct the required kennels, nor was it even in my financial options either. I reviewed the benefits of the free reign socializing tactics I used and could prove that it did not make them out of control as they had accused me of. ''These dogs are allowed to run free without being kenneled and have developed a pack mentality'' . Then they go into a home with children? That would be very dangerous!!'' they said. Well duh. They are in a 'group' right now. There is no clear and strong leader. They do not 'stand together' for any survival needs. As long as they are in my care, they have no enemies. We have no fights. Occasional misunderstandings or tiffs will occur, but are immediately squelched by me. I'd like to see you put 30 kids on a playground and expect to see no disagreements, minor injuries and a few tears from a mishap. You aren't suggesting that the schools contain them in secure cages.
     What I found interesting in all of this is the failure to recognize that I have NEVER had complaints about the temperament of any of my rescued dogs, nor of mistreatment of neglect in all my years of rescue. And not one of the supervisors had ever come to see for themselves nor even sent a representative. When I reminded them of what the animal control officer put on his initial report, they denied ever seeing that. Hmmmm (''On May 4th, 1996, I visited the resident of Randy Warner on Ortega Highway where he has a small rescue efforts for Dalmatians. the animals were happy, seemed healthy and well fed. The premises was clean, securely fenced and were very responsive to Warner's commands and affection") By the way, when they find their 'forever' homes, they are usually the only dog in the home, although sometimes there is another. So, how would they 'carry on' with their pack mentality and do harm to humans.?
     Anyway, each time I tried to explain that this is only a humane effort on my part and have much success that I can point to, will gladly offer as many happy new adoptees as they wish to have and am only asking for a variance. The variance would allow me to continue without being prosecuted constantly, would provide for unannounced visits by animal control to determine the animals safety and well being and this would alleviate the requirement issues that are preventing me from actually obtaining the license that this entire battle is about. Both times I formally spoke to them with this request, they said they had no reason to do so. Funny how they had enough of a reason to battle with me for 4 years and spend nearly $65,000 to bring me to court 43 times - only to see the end result of my receiving a 'not guilty ' verdict from the courts. Not to mention the public slamming them pretty hard and ultimately treating me as if I were a local folk hero. It was also that previous hearing with Riverside County Imbeciles, I believe it was my 41st appearance - the judge that heard me this particular time wanted to be stern and settle the matter.

As I was about to leave, he gave me a mandate that I place at least 10 of the 25 that I had at that appearance and not accept any new ones until all was ok with the county. I agreed. Next court date was one month. On the third week, I had done very well to stay within his mandate by placing 9 of the ten he wanted to see placed. However, three days before the court appearance, I received a call from Christine at the Downey Dog Pound. They had been inundated with Dalmatians and there were 15 of them that were going to be euthanized that evening and asked if I could help. I told her I'd gladly accept them if someone would provide transportation and all shots had been administered and each was previously altered. She agreed. That evening a van pulled into my place which was a two hour drive from the Downey facility and I could see clearly that the van was full, but especially noticed three of the most angelic faces peering out the rear window anyone could imagine. I ran and grabbed my camera and snapped the shot for court.

We unloaded all of them shortly and the worker was on his way. Now I had to go to court and explain to him that my efforts are clearly those that people obviously cannot find within their own counties - Riverside Included. With the recent release of the Disney Live Action Movie, those who rescued Dalmatians have never been busier and that there was no law nor effort through the county's laws that could justify allowing these faces to die just because the county is requiring that I do things like they do. OBVIOUSLY it was the law, but Obviously it wasn't working. If it weren't' for 322 rescues across Riverside county, just imagine how many dogs and cats would have died needlessly and these little angels are a prime example. Also, throughout the trial, since each hearing was attended by a different representative from the animal control office and none of them appeared to be able to add 2 + 2, I kept the heat on. I'd ask in front of the judge, 'What college did you graduate from?" and they would appear as a deer in the headlight, the judge would ask, 'To what benefit is that for anyone to know?" My response was quickly, 'you'll see within the next 15 minutes." Then I would begin bringing out the documents showing how they as an agency had failed on this, come up short on this, been investigated recently by these organizations and state entities and the charges that had been levied against them over the years.
     The Final Trial. Throughout the daylong trial, Pamela Anderson, the county attorney ( is much more resembling Roseanne Barr than the Pamela Anderson most of you are thinking of) and the idiot who was in charge of animal control who had been under severe scrutiny for many many years and never made any attempts to correct the problems that upset so many. Sick animals, loosing animals belonging to residents, euthanizing too soon, never being open when the public could possibly pay them a visit to handle business or consider adopting one of their animals. On more than one occasion, they, with their 'sad eyes' and hearts full of compassion suggested to me as they addressed the courts, that I simply should make the decision to turn all my animals over to them as they were more appropriately set up and trained to handle numbers of animals than I.
     Without missing a beat, I interrupted their little sickening acting job and said' Now, wait a minute here. Aren't' you the people who run Riverside county animal shelter? You still kill your dogs after just three days don't you. By the way, when is the last time you walked through your facility to kiss each dog goodnight as I do and call each one by name? Both turned red and the supervisor demanded that the court consider me a hostile witness. The judge said YOU CAN'T CALL MR. WARNER A HOSTILE WITNESS. HE'S AUTOMATICALLY A HOSTILE WITNESS. YOU ARE PROSECUTING HIM and gave him a dirty look.
     He put his head down and just barely made eye contact with me as the judge was preparing for the next phase of the hearing. I whispered loudly across the front of the courtroom to the animal control supervisor 'HEY, TOM. IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR YOUR TESTICLES, I BELIEVE THE JUDGE KICKED THEM UNDER THAT FILING CABINET OVER THERE and gave a huge smile to show that I had no hard feelings. The judge heard my comments and instructed that everyone must remain quiet until and unless addressed by himself. When he looked down, he had a smirk on his face as I'm sure he was chuckling inside. It was then that I presented my stacks of information showing that they charge more to the tax payers for killing the animals than they do for adopting - thus the reason they aren't open convenient hours, don't' want to see my efforts or those of the remaining rescues to be successful as it truly is a financial means of increasing all their year end profits. His only comment was 'Mr. Warner, it is clear you have a big heart and are using it to do very good deeds. What the county and the courts are trying to get you to do is to find a way in which you can continue these noble efforts without breaking the laws. So, I'm going to set a final trial one month from today. I expect BOTH parties to come prepared with attorneys, homework done and have a solution that we can all live with. Mr. Warner, I'm going to fine you $45 today for not coming to court with a number that showed a reduction of at least ten dogs as was required on your previous appearance. However, I'm going to waive that fine as it seems to me you will need it for dog food.

Of course, they soon found out. I spent every waking hour on the phone with one of three attorneys who all offered to represent me in court. I told them all no. I just wanted to win all by myself.
     So, they explained what the procedure is and how I should respond. What I should take along to present to the courts and even how and when to try and object to the prosecutions' idiocy'. I must have taken some good notes from everyone. This trial was tentatively scheduled for the morning session at 10 am and should be 20-30 minutes long. This is my day and I will not allow it to be taken from me. When it was extended for lunch break, I was ecstatic. I'd kept it going for 2 full hours at least. The afternoon was also productive. the judge did not take kindly to the prosecution's slanderous remarks about my lack of preparedness for these procedures. Came back even more motivated than in the morning.     

Especially when I noticed that Pamela Anderson, the county attorney had dressed up like a Dalmatian as the prosecution atty. she thought since it was getting so much media coverage that it would be humorous. On the second day of this very public trial and certainly against everyone 's better judgment, I did what I had to do. The morning of the trial, I wore a cheap Halloween wig, put a pillow under a blouse I'd thrown on along with a borrowed skirt. Then I painted my lips way over the lip's edge in bright gaudy red and went to court. The Bailiffs questioned me and almost refused to allow me to enter. They finally did and made me sit in the far back corner of the court until the judge called the case.. ''The county of Riverside vs. Randy Warner'' will the parties please step forward. INSTANTLY I hear the judge interrupt and ask Mr. Warner, now I understand this is a passion of yours, but will you please explain your wardrobe this morning? Yes sir, I'd be happy to. Yesterday Pamela Anderson (no secret I hated her as much as she hated me.) was kind enough to dress like a Dalmatian rescuer. In a sarcastic tone of voice, I'd continue, I assumed it was to comfort me in this difficult battle so I decided to repay the favor and have simply come to court today dressed like Pamela Anderson.

The judge blew out some air in an attempt not to laugh, but it was clear as to his understanding of my humor and willingness to pull out all the guns necessary to throw them off guard in hopes of winning. ''We will proceed. Mr. Warner, I will require you to remove the wig. I would demand that you remove the women's clothes but am not even going to ask what you have on underneath them. As soon as we were all at the tables and our materials appropriately displayed, he asked IS EVERYONE COMFORTABLE? and then reviewed all the various steps we would be taking during this court procedure since it was obvious I was not an attorney and still very prepared and willing to fight for my case. We will continue this case. He was very courteous to me. Knowing that this high profile case on my own, every time there was a lull, he asked me if I had anything else to present, I did. I presented information about their profits from killing animals, their lack of training for their employees, the OBVIOUS: and that was that I was doing all I was doing to relieve them of taking in those same 200-300 animals during my residence in Riverside County and felt that they should be thanking me and making every effort to support me.
     Although, I realize it makes it difficult to continue on with the current fund raising means, when I would not be able to provide them with any dead animals to sell. I clearly outlined the facts of why I was doing this because they had not lived up to their responsibility. I did what I could to explain that I had no objection to obtaining a license from the county and agreeing to be visited by them for periodic check ups. what I didn't agree to and was simply unable to do was to construct the dog runs that the county required of me, because I was unable to afford them, was also told by my landlord that he would not permit them and even then, vowed I wouldn't use them anyway. There were three times when I said 'I object' to their comments and twice it was sustained. YEA!! One 6 occasions, they interrupted with the same and only on two occasions were they not overruled. YEA!! Even the judge questioned the planning and zoning requirements for building a separate septic system and their requirement of a $6,000 temporary land use permit. And, since I frequently cared for more than 15 at any given time, that would place me in the 'business' category and now would require me to have handicapped parking out front and also a handicapped bathroom inside my home. The judge actually chuckled at the county's 8 officials, 2 attorneys and 2 supervisors in attendance that day.
     Bob Buster, one of the remaining supervisors went to the newspaper and stated ''We all love our animals here in Riverside County, but Randy Warner is clearly breaking the laws and refused to abide by the regulations and obtain a license for his kennel. These laws were set up for the sole purpose of providing for the safety and well being of the animals until they find their forever homes. Remember that man's name and his comments. It will be a central point of the grand jury investigation that takes place five years later in which Bob Buster is found guilty of several of the total of 26 criminal felony charges levied against the supervisors and animal control. Those who live in glass houses....... I did, indeed find that people are still good people at heart and will quickly become involved when a person is being unjustly wronged and harassed. Sometimes the courtroom had 20-30 people seated - most were strangers until afterwards when they would introduce themselves as supporters of my efforts. On the final two days of the trials, there were 8 people who paraded around the exterior of the courthouse with their precious Dalmatians leashed - all to show their support as well. Here is just a sampling of the letters to the editor that I collected out of the Press Enterprise and the Los Angeles Times regarding my battles. These were all written during my 3 year battle with Riverside county animal control and board of supervisors. The public and media sided with me completely. For entire story, go to http://www.21stcenturycares.org/storybehind.htm and also watch the short 7 min video documentary by George Lucas Film Company regarding my efforts at http://www.21stcenturycares.org/videos/troublespots.wmv

WARNER SHOULD RUN THE COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL
My empathy to Mr. Randy Warner out in Riverside County (Open Forum November 30 regarding Riverside County’s overpopulation of cats and dogs) I; too had a letter just two months ago regarding the Riverside County Shelter. (I have great difficulty using the word shelter as it conjures up the image of comfort and safe keeping unfairly in this case.) But it is easier to sit back and just hope that someone else will step up to the plate to solve these and other problems. Well , finally someone has! The Riverside facility is under funded, underpaid, under educated and over worked. They cannot even take in all the animals that come to them on a daily basis without killing so many innocent ones simply in anticipation of tomorrow’s load expectancy. Instead of working against this man, they should bring him in and put him in charge. After all, he’s doing (as just one man) what they are supposed to be doing BUT unable to do - and all the while, keeps winning court battles between the two entities. Does no one else see this? BETTY HUSEBO Los Angeles

KIND AND COMPASSIONATE
Upon reading about the Dalmatian Rescuer being fined for not having a kennel license, I believe that instead of fining this superior person Randy Warner $135, Court Commissioner Jim Bishop should have sent Mr. Warner a check for $135 to help him with the cost of the rescuing and taking care of those lucky dogs who find their way to Mr. Warner’s kind and compassionate care. Mr. Warner is doing what more of us should be doing – helping those who cannot help themselves, despite the cold and callous opposition of the magistrates. WALTER C. CHIPS Newport Beach

WASTEFUL ANIMAL CONTROL
Why is animal control and now the county board of supervisors bothering Randy Warner. They should take the estimated $40,000 they’ve spent so far attempting to convict, but only getting NOT GUILTY verdicts for Warner, and try to clean up their own facility. The animals there are smelly and sick. There are already too many unwanted animals in this county. They should do something to make them more adoptable. Over the past 3 years, my mom and dad have adopted 2 different Dalmatians from Randy. They always looked happy and were able to play in the yard or go inside his house. They have continued to admit that they have not actually been to Randy’s place, but take the ‘word’ of their officer. They could certainly learn a lot from Randy. I know we have. LINDSAY FORMAN 13 YRS Perris

HELP SOMEBODY WHO CARES
I, too am upset and angry at the tax dollars wasted in Riverside County by self serving bearcats to pursue Randy Warner, rescuer of Dalmatians. Just drive around anywhere and see a beautiful, but dead dog along side of a road. So very many people no longer care about things like this. We have one among us who does and he’s willing to prove it. Let’s help someone who cares – enough for all of us! E.J. WALKER Walnut Hills

MISSING THE POINT
Taxpayers of Riverside County should be aware of the relentless pursuit of that dastardly villain, Randy Warner and his band of fugitive Dalmatians. Animal Control issues a new citation within 48 hours of each court appearance. To get a kennel license, Randy must build kennels, estimated at $10,000 with no guarantee they would be approved by the county, plus a $6,000 land use permit – all money he does not have. Mr.. Warner saves thousands of taxpayer dollars rescuing animals that would be picked up, housed and ultimately destroyed. Those saved dollars are then paid to attorneys to represent Animal Control ‘stooges’ in court against Mr. Warner. The most recent attorney appeared on May 12. Her purpose? To request Commission Bishop deny Mr. Warner’s right to plead not guilty. PATSY MUNOZ Riverside

SAVING DALMATIANS
I’m becoming more and more upset about reading of the endless persecution of Randy Warner in Riverside County who is rescuing Dalmatians. There are so many laws on the books that are never enforced, so why in the world would the county supervisors continue the relentless efforts to try and obtain a conviction on Warner's good deeds? (a conviction in this case could bring as much as a $100 fine; an infraction) Not only lacking in common sense, but seemingly unenforceable by the county or Warner wouldn’t continue to be victorious in the courtroom for several years now. Warner never gets a day off, not even Christmas or Easter, as these dogs must be fed and watered and cleaned up after 7 days a week without fail. So, how in the world could Commissioner Bishop require a bail from this man, with no criminal record, who has sacrificed his pence, freedom and normality of life, in order to save all these innocent Dalmatians? This is becoming a farce for the ‘HILLBILLY MAFIA” or County supervisors to fight until they win. It’s called the male ego. In other words, the least likely person in the county to run away or become a flight risk!! Money he does not have. I’m sick of bearcats wasting my money in a futile attempt to enforce a law that most have never heard of, had nothing to do with making and agree it should be removed from the books. Leave Randy Warner alone!! Don’t fire him, don’t jail him, don’t harass him. He’s the closest thing we have to a saint here in Riverside County! NADIA WEST Murietta

DEFINING A HERO
Randy Warner and his Dalmatian Rescue continues to fight city hall. He continues to be cited and will once again appear in court in Riverside County while the taxpayers will be charged with paying the legal representation of the county board of supervisors just for their futile attempt to ‘’be right’’. On August 24th, the board meets to change the kennel laws. What is now an infraction becomes a misdemeanor. What is now a maximum of $100 fine, will then become a $1,000 fine and carry a six month jail term if found guilty. They admitted in an article from the Press Enterprise that this was another attempt to bring the importance of this issue to Randy Warner. He is continuing to fight for the lives of these otherwise unwanted animals and has, up till now, been within the laws – until they change them to spite him. A hero? Any man who would go to these measures and stay within the law in spite of the circus atmosphere the county has brought upon this case, is truly nothing short of one. He’s willing to give all he has for his beliefs. Good for him. R. A. TEMBLEDORE Pasadena

WRONG APPROACH FOR RESCUER
It amazes me how time and again, a judge makes his or her decision based on zero logic. We have a man among us, whose compassion and love for these unwanted and unloved Dalmatians, knows no bounds. At least that anyone has seen yet. Yes, he devotes 100% of his time to training and caring for these unbelievable numbers of Dalmatians, in hopes they will someday find the home that will keep them and love them as it should be. But, no he doesn’t have the money to construct the expensive and unnecessary constraints and kennels required to satisfy the county officials who are bound and determined to show they are right in this case, but have not been able to in over 3 years. Shame on the bully commissioners for punishing Mr. Warner for what he is doing. Even the law agrees with him over the past few years. They should present him with a plaque awarding him top honors for standing alone and fighting for the lives of these dogs. My husband and 2 children and I took a ride over the weekend to drive past the place we’d heard so much about. Not only did he invite us in, but the amount of love we experienced in these dogs who had just faced certain death, just floored us. They were a mass of moving spots to us, but each one has a name and personality that Randy knows intimately. He has obviously been victorious over these years because he’s doing things right. Too bad the ignorant commissioners can’t see that. DEBORAH MORRIS RUSS West Hollywood

     The end results of my standing up for the animals: The entire mixture of events and introductions throughout my years of doing rescue provided me with many opportunities to meet people who could and would assist in my defense later on. For testimonies, I called Sharon Cody, the mayor of Mission Viejo as well as two other animal protection organizations' directors.
     This notoriety also brought invitations to attend an animal rescue event in Las Vegas during the same weekend that I would be accompanying 24 of my Dalmatians to Caesar's Palace Hotel; and Casino for the Labor Day Telethon where Firefighters posed with my dals for a calendar that would later be auctioned off for Jerry's Kids. The folks who planned the entire event promised that my dogs and I would be picked up and brought to Las Vegas from southern CA in luxury. Sure enough, a beautiful luxury bus owned by Caesars' Palace pulled into my driveway at 8 am for the return trip to Vegas. We decided to stop in Barstow to get everyone lunch - including the dogs - each of which were served one small order of fries for being so well mannered while in the vehicle for the long trip.
     We were driven to the front door of a lovely home owned by a couple who offered their home to use for out stay since they too had Dalmatians living there and thought it would be an experience. We backed the bus into the driveway, opened their garage door and ran back to the rear of the house and everyone followed without even hesitating. This can also be seen in more detail at www.21stcenturycares.org/vegasphotoshoot.htm
     But I believe that the largest honor bestowed upon the dogs and myself was when we were invited to participate in the 1997 Tournament of Roses Parade in Pasadena and walk along side the float for the California Antique firefighters Association. Just about the center of town, I was asking myself why in the world I'd agreed to go along on this overwhelming parade route, as I'd marched in it in my younger years as well. So, I was very aware of the seemingly endless crowd of spectators that line the 5 and 1/2 mile route.
     One week prior to the release of their second live action feature film starring Dalmatians, Disney's Main Headquarters in Burbank was the host of a press conference to plead with the management to keep their promise and provide some information prior to every film' showing in an effort to reduce the large numbers of impulse puppy buying that took place during the first movie release. On both occasions, several groups of animal lovers had been promised that this would happen. However, for the first release, there was no notice at all.
     We weren't expecting an educational segment to a Disney classic, but we also didn't expect to be lied to by the management quite like we were either. So, In Defense of Animals invited The president of the Amanda Foundation of Los Angeles and myself to speak out front of the Disney Complex and then attempt to make a personal delivery of a letter stating our concerns up to the office of Michael Eisner, the president. Wow. ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, Clear Channel Radio, MTV, ETV , Rueters and AP were all there to cover the event. As I put my dogs back into the van to drive home, it was already airing on one of the radio news broadcasts. Then, while they were 'on' the story, MTV and ETV both came out to my place to show an example of Dalmatian Rescue since I had 42 at this particular time. You can read the story in LA Times that covered this event by logging onto http://www.21stcenturycares.org/pressconf.htm
     The entire thing seemed so out of place and oddly coordinated to me. Here I was continuing with my 'troublesome' behavior and battling with officials about the need to rescue these poor animals and once again, facing jail time. As the court dates began to increase and continue on, I would exit the courtroom and enter an interested and sometimes agitated pool of reporters from LA TV stations, major Southern CA newspapers and even a radio station or two who were all covering my story. You see, as the trials began to gain momentum in the media, they were more often than not, barred from entering at all. Just made me feel like a hero for doing something good, but in an illegal fashion. I soon learned that the impact I would ultimately have on the concept of humane education in our nation would absolutely make up for any troubles I had caused the various county governments.
     As the end of these hearings in Riverside County neared, I realized that I had been featured in front page news stories several dozen times in Los Angeles Times and the Press Enterprise publications and literally hundreds of other papers across the nation via Associated Press who covered several of the more publicized hearings. Printed materials included People Magazine, USA Today and several other national magazines. Additionally appeared on the Leeza Gibbons Talk Show three times during all this and was a special guest on Richard Simmons 'Dream Maker' TV show as well. Hard Copy did a story on the trial, as did CBS Evening News.
     The best of all was when George Lucas' film company asked to come out to my home in Menifee and get some footage on what it was I was trying to do. That was ultimately edited to become the video documentary 'Trouble Spots' which is available on my website www.21stcenturycares.org/troublespots.htm Most shocking of all was when the NHK Network out of Tokyo Japan requested permission to bring a film crew to do similar shooting and an interview. The host of the show they used my footage on, was Yoshi Taki - the japanese equivalent of our Tom Cruise I was told. As they all packed up and prepared to leave, the lady in charge quietly handed me a wad of bills totally $1,000. Just their way of saying thanks for all I'd done and would likely continue to do for the animals.
     Throughout the four years of going to court over and over, I tried to keep my efforts very public as well as continuing to adopt as many Dalmatians as possible by doing as many special events as I could schedule. We took 44 Dalmatians and participated in the Mission Viejo, and also Pasadena St Patrick's Day parade with all the Dalmatians having GREEN polka dots for the celebration. On both years we entered, we were awarded the first place trophy for our entry. For two of the summers we had our own booth at the LA Childrens' Fair and passed out information, adopted a few to good homes and received some nice donations to continue our work. I was given four tickets to the premier of the Disney release of their new live action 101 DALMATIANS. That was a very fun evening for 3 friends and myself. It was a typical Hollywood premier with the red carpet, lights and limousines out front. We were also invited to be the ''good luck charms'' at the California Builders' Association's annual black tie/casino night at the Four Seasons Hotel in Newport Beach. Before gambling, the guests were invited to rub the dogs for good luck.

The Anaheim Hilton invited us to be part of the 50-'s night in their main ballroom. So, we custom made their little 'people skirts' and had little saddle shoes tied in place as well as the scarves around their necks. they looked like Laverne and Shirley. The Elvis impersonator for the evening was so impressed with them that he invited them on stage while he entertained the audience for the evening.
     We've all heard the saying, 'NEW YORKERS HAVE SEEN EVERYTHING!” Well, I must admit that I surprised even the most seasoned veterans of the metropolis when I paid a visit in 98. I would still place this particular trip to New York City with my two 'girls' as well as two rescue dogs in my care as being the most amazing thing I may have ever done. I was called to appear on 'Late night with David Letterman'. He requested that I scour the local New York area animal facilities and search for any and all Dalmatians which were adoptable on that given day to see if the problem was truly nationwide. His staff would pay for any and all adoption fees, pay for transporting the animals to Central park with the appropriate handlers, parking and even a lunch voucher. I found, and adopted 47 Dalmatians that day and each one of them arrived at Central Park the following morning at 9am. where I got to know more about the dogs, allowed them to play and exercise and then we began our long walking journey from Central Park, down 5th Avenue at noon for 26 New York City Blocks for the 4:30pm taping of the show.

Within about 8 blocks we were stopped by the police suggesting to us that we allow them to block off one lane of traffic in the streets and allow the pedestrian traffic to continue unobstructed by our army of handlers and Dalmatians. While we waited, a priest came out of St Patrick's Cathedral asking what the special event was. When we explained that we had just saved all these dogs from certain death, he invited us to step into the vestibule of the church and gave us a formal blessing.
     We then continued on to Rockefeller Center where we purchased Soft Pretzels for each one of the dogs. When we arrived at NBC building, I was surrounded by security, press from the New York City papers and TV news as the producers escorted the parade of spots to the elevators that took us to his studio.
     David Letterman was floored to see the results of my one day adoptathon. Through the efforts and generosity of David Letterman Show, 39 of the Dalmatians found [permanent homes through a hotline he had set up. The remaining 8 dogs were accepted by a Connecticut Dalmatian Rescue Organization so they could place them as well. Above are my two as they try to host the show. Below, they address the NYC Kiwanis Club Luncheon
     During our 6 day stay in New York City, I also was asked to speak at a Kiwanis Club meeting downtown at the Hyatt one afternoon and they made it clear that my Dalmatians were very welcome to attend the special luncheon. Of course they did and proudly wore their best bowties to the event. As I am now becoming more of a folk hero for all the Los Angeles basin, I was invited to bring all 27 of my Dalmatians to the Federal building on Wilshire and the Santa Monica freeway and this nice couple would make all the arrangements for me to hold a nice adoption fair one Saturday afternoon.

The host organization provided everything out of their own pocket. 'New Leash On Life' organization in Los Angeles. It was marvelous. clowns for the kids, a hot dog stand, a radio station and three big fire trucks were on site. After speaking to a pair of women about my ongoing fight in the neighboring county, they both said, they'd heard so much about me and now they were totally convinced that they needed to step in to help. Kathy Riordan was one of them. She is the daughter of the 'then' mayor of Los Angeles, Richard Riordan.
     A week later, she placed this article in the Los Angeles Times regarding the entire waste of time and efforts; It is clear to me now, that this media attention is in large part responsible for the favorable outcome to this whole thing. I suggest that everyone who does rescue to any extent, try and get their local paper and TV station to come out and cover your efforts occasionally - especially when you attend the classroom for presentations. The media loves photos with children and pets. This gives your organization much public attention as well as credibility when standing in front of a court of law.
    

JUST KILL THE DOGS
by Kathy Riordan (Los Angeles Mayor Riordan's daughter)
A sad reflection upon our current society. Randy Warner of Dalmatian ResQ in Riverside County is one who should be made into a hero and not criminally prosecuted. Even the general 'man about town' is unaware of all that is taking place. Throughout every city and state across the country, those who demonstrate volunteerism and good citizenship are highly valued. By supplementing what would otherwise be the full responsibility of local governments, these individuals fill the gaps left by skeleton staff. They withstand undue pressure to do the impossible, and are threatened by downsizing and insufficient funds needed to maintain quality services or even properly execute mandate.
     The kill rate in most counties across the nation is embarrassingly high and is one of the worst examples we continue to set for our future generations to come. These agencies, along with the county and municipal governing bodies, could and should view these volunteers and rescues as 'assistants' who help out for no pay or compensation whatsoever. Instead, when a good citizen steps forward to save the lives of hundreds or even thousands of companion animals, including dogs and cats who would otherwise become staggering statistics, he/she is met with incredible and very encumbering fees, regulations and rules, legal threats and more.. This, while over 8 million adoptable pets are to be killed each year in this country, and backyard breeders choose to have a recreational litter of kittens or puppies with almost no regulation, guidance or structure at all. Yet, they are the people who are clearly the contributing factor in this problem.

Again we see the "without victims" theory coming into play; in this case, animal control agencies would loose many jobs. This is mainly due to a seriously inadequate understanding by Americans as to the results of their actions. Animal control agencies that have a highly questionable record of humane performance and fail to 'market' their commodity as a normal business would ,allow this to continue with no thought of any tomorrows. Poor business hours for adoptions and retrievals of lost pets, fall short in reminding their public of the pets who are adoptable on a widespread, regular basis, frequently unwilling to require mandatory spay neuter to any pet going out the door.
 

Most of the problems stem from a lack of understanding within the community of the restrictions and requirements placed on the underpaid, overworked and under educated animal control staff. It becomes a vicious circle. But, it's all becoming much more clear recently. The 'lip service' we hear from everyone else is a cover up for their ignorance and refusal to be responsible caring citizens.
     Law enforcement agencies, large numbers of elected officials and a surprising majority of our citizens have no respect for the lives of these innocent animals or these things would clearly have been looked into and dealt with accordingly. This also means they refuse to properly acknowledge the proven impact that conditions and actions have on the future generations of children who fall victim to having parents with little or no patience for the obvious. And the subsequent results are allowed to contaminate our future generations with the same disrespect as many other like situations that were quickly outlawed and strongly governed. We need to be smart.
     We need to change the way we view and teach the world in a very different way. Not similar to what we've done for 60 years, but differently - a way that works. We need to prove to the legislators at all levels that even though animals don't vote or contribute to campaign re-elections, WE DO! And we should do it volume. Ask each and every person running for office about their views and plans for improvements, and hold them to it.
     So, when our congressmen and women, senators and assemblymen drag their feet and vote “no” on important animal legislation, - law enforcement continue to claim a lack of time and resources is their justification for not making appropriate arrests, - the judges are refusing to uphold current laws by offering lighter sentencing and dismissing charges completely and - the local governing bodies are giving themselves up to 35% pay increases annually - all this, while cutting the animal control budgets, they are sending a message that America hears. Until further notice, the general public and lawmakers are sending a strong message, and it is coming through loud and clear – JUST KILL THE DOGS!!

     The previous article could run in any major paper in America and strike a chord. Almost every week, somewhere in America, an animal collector/hoarder situation is raided, often requiring the rescue of hundreds of animals at a time. Often the media, the authorities, and the rescue community condemns and accuses. We are so accustomed to being betrayed by our society and government that we have little tolerance for being betrayed by one of our "own. "The biggest reason for being turned into the pound in America is because people didn’t do what was necessary to get the dog to be appropriately behaved. The second reason is that the humans were moving or found it inconvenient to live with the dog in their lives. This ultimately guarantees these dogs will die.     

With the number of unwanted animals our nation’s facilities are forced to accept, there is no alternative, but to kill up to 80% of all incoming animals. Many within hours of their arrival. Yet we continue to have litters and be unrealistic in our desires of how we expect our animals to behave with no professional training or even the appropriate care. Is that a society who honestly loves dogs? Here we are 7 years after my battle with Riverside County idiots. Since then, there have been 3 county investigations into the board of supervisors and even a grand jury investigation finding 28 felony criminal charges against the animal control as well as Bob Buster and several other supervisors in 2003. Now, in the March 11 Press Enterprise, it was reported that not one single requirement from the grand jury investigation has been implemented. As a matter of fact, employment has been reduced due to budget cuts and they kill more dogs than ever. Oh, and yes, the supervisors have voted themselves yet another pay increase. This time it was 35% annually. The Riverside County residents could care less. Too many politics with what used to be LEAF and other groups simply being ignorant and unwilling to step up to the plate.
     In Europe, with it's no-kill shelters, euthanasia is only administered by veterinarians and only by lethal injection. Their strict licensing, animal control and welfare laws, and national databases of convicted animal abusers and neglecters put American's laws and actions (or lack there of) to shame. There is no lip service there, but a genuine love and responsibility taught and expected from every citizen. They don’t have collectors or hoarders. There is no need for an overload of rescue organizations. They truly understand their place and the animals’ place.     

We cannot say that about North Americans. We’ve created a prevailing system of apathy and ignorance, where shelters and volunteer rescue efforts cannot possibly stem the tide, where government has mostly turned its back on animal welfare and control efforts, where anything "animal" is usually paid ‘lip’ service (always said softly, bottom lip protruding in that tone of voice that denotes sympathy or pity) and then, given the lowest priority, where animals often die horrible deaths, where local animal rescue organizations can barely fund the resources they provide to "crisis" situations, and where a lot of people, as well as the major humane organizations are making MILLIONS AND MILLIONS from animals. Americans believe they can buy their way out of any situation. “I’ll do what ever I please, then when it catches up to me, I’ll just buy my way out”.
     That is exactly why the national organizations are rolling in the dough. We send funds out of guilt and out of pity. Then refuse to do the right thing the rest of the year by speaking out, altering pets and helping the local situations that we can more closely monitor. I get a lot of mail each week and often from rescuers who are out of hope and out of funds. They sometimes describe personal situations to me that worry me, and they ask me if I have any suggestions of help for them. Then everything I suggest is something they just couldn’t imagine trying. I've even angered some Rescue efforts with criticisms (largely borne of frustration), because their efforts and websites and fundraisers and other events include NO advocacy and education components. That means we will always be forced to deal with the status quo, rescuing animal by animal, with no end in sight (and where I'm often "wrong" is that's still better than nothing!). The next generation will be doomed to spending time and money rescuing to a similar degree. We will NEVER save all the animals who need help. There will be that given percentage which cannot be reached in time.
     If each rescuer were to take 20% of their time and resources and went to the local schools, we could ALL see a reduction of the need to follow in their footsteps in our lifetimes! So, for every rescuer who is spending all their time and resources on rescuing animals and not addressing the cause of these problems to their local ‘masses’, I ask you to view this more from the standpoint of a business. For every "accomplishment" we cheer about, some other situation or decision by government seems to take us two steps backwards. One more reason I added 'PROJECT VOTE SMART" to this site. You need to know where your representatives stand on the local and area animal issues, let them know you are voting accordingly and let your voice be heard. For evil to prevail, good people need to do nothing. Of course nobody wants to see the animals suffer.
     No one adopts a pet for the fun of taking it to the pound to watch it die. Yet, we watch and still do nothing and we take nearly a thousand pets to the pound every day in this country - few for any justifiable reason. (“moving”, ‘don’t have time”, not right for the kids”) etc. With that said, education does make the most sense. It changes people's perceptions of what is happening, what they can and can't do in order to prevent further pain and anguish and death among our animal friends. I've seen it change teen lives right in front of me. If we could get America and Canada to "no kill" as soon as possible, if we could outlaw every method of "euthanasia" except by lethal injection (http://www.crean.com/kindness), if we could get every animal lover in the country to write a letter to an editor on an animal issue, and demand that our media report on those issues, and hold government at all levels accountable for, at the least, animal control and welfare issues - we could see such improvements, stop creating "collectors" and maybe we could negate the need to rescue hundreds/thousands of poorly cared for animals at a time, who further deplete rescue resources. Then, as you read in the story regarding my on going battle with County officials, I began to look into some things.
     With True Ignorance of how the laws will be enforced and by whom......I now have a good friend who is a Paralegal, Animal Control Officer, Law Enforcement Officer,, Humane Educator, and a number of other things. Being in Animal Welfare, we feel like questioning the value of humans quite often. I have done many things in my short adult life and I want to ponder and propose in an effort to make people think….So, pardon me if I seem to ramble…I’ve been front line and reinforcement for animal issues. I have seen the large national organizations do nothing and I’ve seen single individuals move mountains. I know that government is being forced to legislate, moderate, and enforce more than ever. The problem I don’t understand is why any agency (public or private) is willing to create legislation and rules about and for animals, yet they don’t understand the first thing about animals.
     Let’s look at legislators for a moment. It really doesn’t matter if they are federal, state, or local municipalities. There are laws on the books about dogs and cats across this great Nation. But, do the people who are writing the laws understand animal behavior? Some legislators do look to their local animal welfare agency for guidance….but do they know? Does the local humane society know? Do the local vets know? A vet may know how a cat behaves in a stressful situation, but do they know how to write a law to protect that cat? Humane Societies are helpful, to an extent….they know about the overpopulation problem, and they surely appreciate the stupid reasons people dump their pets, but do they know what an animal control officer faces in the field?
     Can an animal control officer adequately convey to the legal department what needs to be included in the actual legislation? We must all pull together and share our information in order to create good, powerful legislation. The attorneys can put all the jargon together, but what use is that, if they don’t know or appreciate the need on the street? Unfortunately, many animal control officers are without professional training (and they’re not attorneys) so they are usually unable to create the verbiage necessary for such a task. When creating legislation, animal behavior MUST be considered. If you’re going to hold a dog responsible for biting a human, should the human bitten also be held responsible?
     Every weathered animal control officer will agree that the person responsible for the dog should be held responsible!! Every good and knowledgeable citizen SHOULD feel the same way. Each case is individual and is cause for investigation. Each case ought to be examined by someone who understands animal behavior. If a person tries to take food out of a dog’s mouth, is it unreasonable to expect the animal to allow it? (I’m not talking common sense stuff, my dog would let me and any responsible owner’s dog would accept that) We’re talking about the people who do not care for or train their dog….the irresponsible pet owner. If a child trips over a sleeping dog and the dog bites the child, who’s fault is it? That is normal, typical behavior for a dog! Where were the child’s parents? Yes, accidents happen…..should a life be taken because of it? However, if a child walks by a dog (no food on the kids face, no sleeping dog situations) is it fair to let the dog maul the child while no human is held responsible? I’m not saying euthanize the dog, I’m saying give the owners choices. I don’t believe in “3 bites your out” type legislation, but I also don’t think that a truly vicious dog ought to be allowed to terrorize a neighborhood.

Judges are often in this loop of “uneducated” enforcers. They are not in the street and it’s not their neighbor’s dog that is keeping them up at 4:00 in the morning. Often times, they have no regard for animals (especially if you live in Rural, USA). It’s a dog; they have felons to worry about in over flowing jails. I don’t care what their excuse is….if they are elected Judges, VOTE!!! If they are appointed judges, then talk with the person that appointed them (Often the Governor or Mayor). HOLD THEIR FEET TO THE FIRE AND MAKE THEM DO THEIR JOB!
     Animal laws are just as important as human laws! Violence breeds Violence! Cops are on the street to protect the public. Sometimes that protection is from a 400# armed robber, sometimes it’s from a 150# Rottweiler. They are there to enforce the laws. It does not matter if that law is a federal law, a state law, or a local ordinance. They are sworn to uphold and protect. Educate the police chief and offer to help. Don’t just sit there and criticize….help them understand. OK, enough about the public sector….let’s look at some private issues: Apartment complexes…..all of us know several apartment complexes that do not allow pets. The complexes that do allow dogs often have a weight limit of, oh, we’ll say 20#. I can tell you from experience, the average dog weighs in at 55#. The complex claims that a small dog causes less damage.
     Hogwash! A properly trained dog, no matter what the size, causes no damage! (I’m not talking about during thunderstorms!). Hold the people responsible, not the dog! Ok, so a toy poodle will pee less than a Doberman pinscher. Either way, the carpet is wet and has to be cleaned! If you have a housetrained dog, that is not an issue anyway!!! Besides, everyone who has a lick of sense knows that a Great Dane or Greyhound is a much better apartment dog than a Jack Russell Terrier! Heck, even a Saint Bernard would be better than a Rat Terrier….it’s what is inside that counts!
     So why do they have the stupid weight limit? I’ve never understood that! Here’s another situation that dog owners are facing everywhere TODAY! Canceled homeowners’ insurance, inability to renew, or flat rejection for coverage. Why? Because they have a certain “type” of dog. What type is that, you ask? BIG! The insurance black list of dogs is growing each day. It includes Pit-Bull (doesn’t matter which type of pit), Dobermans, Rottweilers, Great Danes, German Shepherds, Dalmatians, Golden Retrievers…wait! Did I say “Golden Retrievers”? why, they are the “American Family Dog”! Yes, that is what I said. Humane responsibility is going down the toilet, everyone wants to blame someone else.

INSURANCE COMPANY PROFILING PETS
Dangerous dogs or misunderstood pooches? Dog lovers, insurers tussle over `profiling'
This could affect all families with pets before long! Coming to an insurance company near you?
Sadly, yet another instance where, WE must pay for the mistakes and irresponsible actions of the owners of certain breeds. In a horrifying trend city and county governments have implemented similar laws and restrictions with breed specific legislation which, due to ignorance is sweeping the nation.
Pet owners want the state Legislature to put an end to what some call ``canine profiling'' by insurance companies, the practice by some carriers to refuse homeowners' coverage to those who own Doberman pinschers, Rottweilers or other specific breeds of dogs.
Dog lovers and representatives of insurance companies will state their positions at a hearing today in Olympia on House Bill 1895, which would make it illegal for insurance companies to refuse to provide homeowners' insurance solely because of the breed of dog.
This is one of many ways in which everyone pays for the poor judgment and subsequent treatment of their companion animals by people who refuse to do the right thing in training their animals. It just goes to prove that everyone needs to speak out when they see someone giving a dog the wrong type of care or guidance. For those of us who are guardian to one or more of the listed breeds in question, we know it’s not the dog, but the poor care and lack of attention provided by their humans. In other words, those who abuse and neglect them. When speaking of ‘training’ in these cases, it is not necessarily something you pay an outside source to accomplish, but moreover, simply providing the proper and appropriate care and nurturing for said pet."`
     Fewer and fewer insurance carriers are covering homeowners with large breeds of dogs,'' Campbell said Monday. "The insurance companies just basically aren't renewing. They're telling those dog owners to go away,'' Campbell said. Faye Strauss of Kent, who owns three Doberman pinschers, plans to testify in support of the bill. Like other pet owners, she believes that there are no bad dogs, just bad or irresponsible owners. "You're buying a house, you have to have insurance. What if a condition is you have to get rid of your dog? That's a bit onerous on the homeowner,'' Strauss said. The Washington Animal Foundation, working with other organizations, has compiled a list of dogs and breeds they say have been black-listed by insurance companies. The list includes pit bulls and Rottweilers and other breeds involved in well-publicized attacks on people.
     But the list also includes a range of other breeds, including Irish setters, Dalmatians and German shepherds. "Some of the dogs on that list you wouldn't even think of as being potentially dangerous, like a collie, for goodness sake,'' said Campbell. He owns two purebred Rottweilers he says are well trained, well behaved and ``people friendly.'' Campbell said he's received ``about 50 e-mails'' from people around the Puget Sound region who have had insurance problems because of the breed of their dog, but he didn't have any figures of how prevalent the problem is statewide.
     Kim and David Owens of Granite Falls saw their homeowners' coverage abruptly canceled about five years ago after their insurance carrier of eight years sent them a survey form and they reported having three Doberman pinschers. "About a week later, we get a cancellation notice,'' Kim Owens said.
`     `These are show dogs with obedience and temperament titles. That didn't matter to them -- just the fact they were Dobermans and they said, `too bad,''' she said. The Owens called about a dozen insurance carriers but were unable to obtain homeowners' liability coverage. They now have only mortgage insurance. The National Association of Independent Insurers, which represents about 750 companies nationwide, will oppose the legislation, said Michael Harrold, a spokesman for the group. Nationwide, about 30 percent of all claims against homeowners' liability policies involve dog bites, Harrold said. `It's a very serious, and at times, costly, issue,'' he said.
     Karl Newman, executive director of the Washington Insurance Council, which represents companies doing business in this state, said the majority of carriers aren't basing coverage on any list of dog breeds. `It's not like there's some crisis out there where if you own a Chow, you just can't get insurance. That's just not happening,'' Newsman said.
Some companies do consider a homeowner's breed of dog, especially if it's a larger breed, Newman said, but most carriers are more concerned about whether the dog has a history of being viscous or threatening. "`If you have a poodle that bit somebody, you have an issue and you're going to have trouble getting homeowners' insurance,' Newman said.

DOG BREEDS ON INSURERS' LISTS
The Washington Animal Foundation, which encourages proper training of all dogs, says informal research across the nation by related groups has found insurance companies are less likely to insure homeowners who own certain breed of dogs. The list, which the WAF says varies from state to state, includes the following breeds and types of dogs:
* Akita
* American Pit Bull Terrier
* American Staffordshire Terrier
* Bull mastiff
* Bull terrier
* Chow Chow
* Collie
* Dalmatian
* Doberman pinscher
* English bulldog
* German shepherd
* Great Dane
* Greyhound
* ``Guard dogs''
* Irish Setter
* Keeshound
* Kuvasz
* Malamute
* Rottweiler
* Siberian husky
* Staffordshire bull terrier
· Wolfhound

     Dogs bite….cats bite….give me the right reason, and I’ll bite too! Don’t hold the dog responsible, hold the people responsible. If you have a dog and you’re a responsible owner, you will see to it that the dog will not bite (under normal circumstances – I WANT it to bite if someone is coming through my window at 3 a.m.). Why won’t insurance agencies just make stipulations for coverage? Basic obedience, sterilization, socialization…..all those things will help teach a dog how to behave in polite society. It has NOTHING to do with the breed! So, if you’re still with me, congratulations!!! I hope I haven’t bored you to tears.
     Here is my challenge to you: Don’t sit on your butt and complain about all these stupid rules and regulations! Get off your duff, contact the people who make these statements and educate them! Help them understand basic animal behavior and why it is in their best interest to consider animal behavior when they are making these laws. Don’t go in there with a “holier than thou” attitude because you have the answers; approach them with a helping attitude. By helping the stupid human, you help the dumb animal (dumb, like can’t talk, not dumb as in stupid….I’ve known some really smart dogs! But they still couldn’t talk).
     Don’t even get me started on ‘leash laws’, ‘tied up dogs’ so-called ‘’guard dogs’’ that have had no training and couldn’t’ save your ass anyway cause they’re OUTSIDE and penned or tied up – oh I could go on forever. Ask my husband. It boils down to making PEOPLE be responsible, not punishing animals because their humans are stupid! The final straw that broke the camel's back was when I was trying to show the residents of the area that I appreciated all their support throughout the nearly four year battle with riverside county's elected criminal element, so I decided to form an animal organization to service the needs of that corner of the county. Lake Ellsinore was the closest branch of the animal control and that was over 30 miles away. They were very established and had called me 30 or 40 times over the previous ten to 15 years to request that I rescue a Dalmatian or two that was in their facility. I always did so. I was beginning to feel very trusted within the ranks when there.
     But, when they found out that I was attempting to form the Temecula Valley Humane Association, they quickly instructed their attorneys to place a letter in the paper to clearly separate themselves from our efforts for fear that we would steal some of their popularity and subsequent donation base. We had decided, and made it very clear, that we would not be in a situation where competition would be necessary in any way as we were not planning to build any facility or have any paid employees. We would provide education programs to all the area schools and have an army of volunteers who could foster any pets that were acquired within our local area until the county could make arrangements for a pick up.
     I mean, we made every attempt to look into the future and was hopeful that we could all work side by side in an effort to save the animals. But that was not to be. They viewed by actions as 'being against' them since they are a contracted source of the county animal services department. That newspaper article then seemed to 'cool'' the interests of the area schools as well. Now, I see so much more as to why the animal movement is so bogged down and unsuccessful. Egos, Ignorance, Politics, Power and Greed. Since it is such an enormous means for raising funds from the public, I would say with confidence that the bickering, bad mouthing and games are at a level that surpasses most other businesses of today. Then it became so very clear to us what was happening. As we announced the planned formation of the TVHA, we were approached by the ASPCA, HSUS and several other world leaders in animal protection efforts. Each one trying to convince us to call ourselves ''the ____ Humane Society'' or in another case '' The _____ SPCA.
     Most interesting to all of us was their level of convincing - even monetary donations to help our efforts to assure proper funding. That is where the Lake Elsinore group feared that we would be butting in on some of their easy money sources. We made it very clear that we needed no funds at this time. We also incorporated the organization to read: We plan to operate no facility but to make every effort to assist existing local and area authorities in timely pick ups and appropriate care until they can make arrangements for the animals pick up. Of the total amount of hours provided by the team of volunteers we were gathering at monthly meetings we held at a restaurant's upstairs group room, we clarified that 80% of our efforts would be directly used for humane education in the area schools and 20% of our time would be in caring for the animals on a foster only basis. We also set it up to where it would automatically dissolve itself in the year 2018 - exactly 20 years from our initial efforts to form were confirmed. Our thoughts were, that if we were going to be successful in our efforts, we would no longer be a necessary commodity by the year 2018. And also, that if the residents of the area were to refuse to take the information and put it to good use, then there would be no reason to continue either. Leading to my next information: I've even constructed a top ten list.

Ten reasons why money alone will not solve the animal related problems!!

Today's animal protection efforts come under fire by various media groups and animal protection organizations. Many within the ranks are confident that most of the problems we work so diligently on, could have and should have been solved and corrected years ago, but for one problem: Human Beings! With over 3,000 animal protection organizations in this country, boasting millions of 'members' and logging an estimated 50 billion man hours since 1979, one must wonder.
     So, what's the problem you ask.. After all, We are Americans. If we honestly wanted this problem to be solved, it would have been by now. No doubt about it. If anyone has any honest expectations of actually seeing changes and truly solving some of the basic problems that plague our animal friends, then we must make changes. We can no longer afford to argue our egos, explain away our failures, defend our agendas and continue to waste billions of dollars to continue fighting a battle with the same ammunitions that have consistently brought defeat in the past. It's no secret, that if unified, the animal protection movement would be the largest lobbying effort in Washington and we would be able to see many changes.
1 - Most Americans do not know much at all about the proper care and treatment necessary for a dog or cat to have the good life they deserve and they refuse to learn. There is no comprehensive educational program to provide reliable information regarding proper care and instinctive habits that surface in our pets' activities. Most humans misunderstand their pets actions, refuse to 'listen' to them and only provide the same treatment as what they witnessed when growing up. Unfortunately that still holds true today. Their egos seem to win out over compassion and willingness to be educated. No body asks professionals for guidance, rents videos or reads websites to get the proper care for their pets because they refuse to be reminded that they don’t know. The animals suffer.
2 - Schools continue to deny offers for humane education - even though most programs are free. And even though it can and will affect each and every person in that building sometime during their lives.Our nations' schools are so under funded and constantly being driven by test scores, they are rarely welcoming when organizations offer to bring a humane education program into their classes - even though a few states have mandatory humane education laws and many of the humane education programs offered are at no charge to the schools. These programs have multi-level benefits to all the young people who attend. When it's brought into the class through the guidance counselor program of character development, the young people have higher achievement scores, improved attendance rates and frequently adopt a less violent conflict resolution technique which leads to a more compassionate future for everyone. But, the Animal Foundation in Las Vegas laughingly argues that they DO provide Humane Education to their local and area schools and proudly point to the 3 days they had a volunteer at the school for the mentally handicapped last season as proof. Of course, the educated reader will ask, 'Well what about the rest of the 800,000 students in the district? Where was your organization the other 230 school days?" To which they will have no answer. We don't think they actually gave that any thought, so we dropped the subject.
3 -- This brings us to the Large National Organizations and the fact that most of them are much more interested in raising money, pointing fingers at other national organizations, avoiding the real problems, and use the money to money to pay over-inflated salaries than to actually educate the public or make a true noticeable difference. But they still know how to 'pat themselves on the back' so they can rake in another $1 billion of your dollars this year. It's practically unheard of for them to work together. They seem much more interested in top billing as opposed to the end results and actual accomplishments. How far along do you think the space program would be today if NASA was actually 7 competitive entities who refused to share their knowledge and combine efforts for a common goal? We need to point out that Americans have paid $1 billion in taxes to animal control efforts annually for the past 20 years and subsequently donated an equal amount of nearly $1 billion to their favorite animal protection organizations annually. With that, you would think that we could proudly say ''See all the problems we've solved" but have we have solved even one thing! They've made the same promises for 25 years and never kept a single one. But they can sure take our donations each year with a big smile. Then, blindly, we give again. Politics, Agendas, Egos and Greed tend to lead to the continuing demise of the seemingly noble efforts. So my first concern is, knowing all this, why haven't the larger animal organizations taken on a project and SOLVED IT? They have the manpower, the legislative votes and the financial resources to do so. What has become of the more than $40 billion from the past 25 years? Like a non profit Enron. Unfortunately, their primary goals are to keep their organization financially strong while ignoring the potential they have to actually do what they've promised their contributors. After all, if they should actually solve one or more of the major problems, they would be forced to downsize, layoff employees and would also be forced to abolish their cute little pictures of dogs and cats behind bars awaiting certain death - 'the money shots' as they are called. They spend the billions of dollars we've given them over the years on over inflated salaries, luxury offices and even allow millions to simply sit in their bank accounts (per their 2002 IRS Tax returns) to collect interest. Yet, they fail to show any results or true nationwide success stories.
4 - Animal controls are notoriously under funded and under educated, yet over worked because of humans who refuse to be responsible and caring. They are caught in the middle. The citizens want better animal control, but the agency is never properly funded by their supervisory boards. . Many animal control agencies profit from the animals they kill, but the community doesn't know or won't take proper steps to make the necessary changes. Again, though, the animals suffer.
5 - The city governments around the nation just pooh-pooh any animal related upgrades or additional funding. But are quick to give themselves substantial pay raises on a regular basis. Much of this comes from simple ignorance as well as greed. They don't even believe in themselves, let alone the residents in the given jurisdictions. They do NOT protect the animals, and have the audacity to charge volunteer rescuers money for every little thing - MUCH of it having little or nothing to do with the safety and well being of the animals, but everything to do with trying to prevent rescues from forming and to squeeze as much money out of them as possible if they do.
6 - Rescue groups and individuals around the nation work their butts to the bone, devote most of their lives, spend thousands of their own dollars, only to waste hours and hours gossiping online to harm other rescuers or to be back-stabbed by a co-worker, forming modern day witch hunts or be ram-sacked by animal control officers, and, with no appreciation or even respect by the majority of the citizens, become bitter and apathetic. Much too much ego boosting and again, forgetting what their goals actually are too much of the time. They rarely do more than clean up yesterday's mess - almost never considering tomorrow. While these noble individuals who actually put in all the work get paid nothing - even spend thousands of their own dollars each year on this effort, the bulk of publicity and praise seems to go to the larger national organizations who continue to battle each other for positioning, the rescue community refuses to organize or develop an agency of their own making to regulate, provide a voice in government and protect the rescuers as well as help the animals. When presented with an opportunity to make a difference, they tend to explode initially, but fail to make a presentation that is affective nor have any follow-through. In spite of the incredible level of commitment, time, energy and money, they know little about how to accomplish other than placing their rescues. There for, nothing in regards to organizing, future planning, setting standards and guidelines, having a voice in congress, providing insurance and protection for their rescues is being done - and it all needs to be done. All the while, they simply assure themselves and the animals that nothing will change for tomorrow because non of them made any arrangements and gave only yesterday and today any thought.
7 - Most courts refuse to uphold the laws that are in place and fail to prosecute those who harm or even kill innocent animals. This, in spite of the facts that we KNOW through research that those who begin early life with abusing animals are much more likely to grow up and continue by committing more severe crimes against humans. There is no secret our jails are overcrowded today. However, there is also no secret that the links between animal abuse and more severe criminal activity and violence against humans are well researched and proven. These acts of violence need to be addressed by the courts to prevent so much violence and criminal behavior in the future.
8 - All mainstream religion refuses to discuss the brutal treatment of the companion animals we all call Man's Best Friend, knowing that abuse, neglect and death happens within each congregation on a regular basis, but it's OK for them to tell us what to eat, who to sleep with and even clear guidelines of what to wear. All this while asking for donations and the animals continue to suffer. With a local rape case or child molestation, they move mountains to show their compassion. Knowing that hundreds of animal abuse cases happen in the same area each week, they choose to ignore them. Maybe we should donate to our places of worship in the names of our pets. $$$$$
9 - THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REFUSES TO TELL THE REAL TRUTH BECAUSE IT UPSETS TOO MANY VIEWERS TO HEAR HOW MANY DOGS AND CATS WE KILLED YESTERDAY. You know what? I'll bet all those animals dragged into the little room to be killed yesterday were a little upset, too, and would have gladly sat back and forgiven us if we'd upset some people if only they could have lived another day. Additionally, it is MOST LIKELY those who are causing the problems, that don’t want to be reminded of their repeated mistakes.
10 - Obviously corporations have not been smart enough to recognize the value of their roles in this, nor how they could all benefit by working to correct these problems. The fact is, nobody has been smart enough yet to clearly show the public, local governments and even corporations, how finding solutions to these problems would actually benefit their ‘bottom line’ by paying fewer taxes, charging responsible guardians with acceptable fees, bringing a more compassionate community and work force - all while saving lives. A MUCH MORE COMPASSIONATE WORLD IN WHICH TO LIVE! "BROUGHT TO YOU BY XYZ CORP. A SPONSOR OF HUMANE EDUCATION IN OUR SCHOOLS"
I am more and more convinced that NOBODY truly wants to see these problems of animal abuse and pet overpopulation solved. There are good reasons why. It pad a large number of egos, supports a substantial number of jobs and would simply take an honest, mature effort of 'sharing' ideas and working 'together' - something the animal protection movement in this country is simply not capable of doing. Everyone wants an easy fix. The claim that ’’it takes money’’ to get this done is just stupid. If that were true, you would certainly think that we would have reached that dollar amount by now. Everyone insists on lining their pockets while demanding to do it 'their way' without ever listening to other ideas. But, without at least listening to all the ideas, then how would you know which way is best? I really hope the public will finally recognize that they need to speak out when they see someone who's mistreating or neglecting their pets. It is not only their right to report their neighbors and friends for not providing the appropriate care for these creatures, it is their responsibility to do so.
Undoubtedly, our nation must give serious consideration to including a substantive and powerful humane education program in our curriculums very soon. By not doing so, they are literally allowing these poor pets to suffer - even die. Teaching our decision makers of tomorrow that compassion, nor education is really all that important. Finally everyone also needs to recognize that although the larger animal orgs have a strong and substantial place in our society, we cannot depend on them to solve any problems, as has been proven over the years.
Recognizing that all these problems are OURS to solve through becoming more educated and responsible in how we view our companion animals is the only way. We have the ability to make changes WHEN WE WANT TO!!!!!! We just really haven’t wanted to up until now. When the large organizations can begin working together, the rescue efforts can stop bickering and feeding their own egos, the local governments will be held to the fire when they fail to protect their local animals by upholding the existing laws, the media can finally have a strong and informative story to tell, schools aren’t afraid of a one hour program for fear of affecting their almighty test scores and corporations can finally see that solutions actually offer additional $$ to their bottom line, we may begin to see improvements - even solutions. I
It’s called “working smarter, not harder“. Should it be that we are unable to handle our differences within this movement with more direction and less immaturity, we will be forced to leave these problems to our children - admitting we were incapable of solving the problems we have spent so much time and effort on.
Currently there is a proposal using sentient property augment as a balanced compromise about the legal status of pets. The concept defines animals as living, feeling companions but without the rights and liberties people enjoy. It is a compassionate way in which courts can recognize that animals have feelings and emotions, rather than merely being property like a chair or table. This idea was introduced during the American Veterinary Medical Law Association meeting last year.
In America's common law tradition, animals are a form of personal property. The classification was designed to prevent people from stealing animals, and was the first anticruelty statutes appeared around the time of the Civil War. Such was the extent of animal law in the United States for more than 100 years. But that's all changed. Today, animal rights and humane groups proliferate. Animal welfare legislation abounds. Pet owners in many cities consider themselves pet guardians. Law schools offer courses in animal law. Extremists threaten biomedical researchers and vandalize laboratories of those who use animals in experiments. Many pet owners think of their Boxer dog or tabby cat as a member of the family.
Clearly, society no longer values animals for their usefulness alone. And yet, the legal status of animals remains unchanged. This clearly shows the need to update much of our legislation and bring us out of the horse and buggy era and into the present. As I begin to close this conversation out shortly, I remind everyone to do your own research into your local and area animal related problems. Ask a police officer. Write letters, contact elected officials and ask them what they plan to do about it and hold them accountable. The Large National Animal Protection Groups Has the trust been abused and broken by the larger national animal protection advocacy groups? It is said that in America, anything the imagination can conjure up can be attained with persistence.
In a society where we boast of freedom and clearly recognize the importance of our leadership in the world, one must be increasingly disillusioned by the simple things in life that prevent us from moving ahead even further. We can successfully put roving monitors on mars, cure diseases in short order, win wars in 100 days or less and have the marketing prowess to alter human life around the globe. The suffering of animals is a deep and quiet thing; and yet, millions of people hear, and care and hope to answer this call. More than3,000 non profits dedicated to the same have logged an estimated 40Billion man hours in the past 20 years all while Americans are donating billions of their dollars to animal welfare organizations who promise that they are relieving animal suffering. But are they? Or, is the trust being placed in them by their donors, being betrayed? The overpopulation of dogs and cats is the major source of the suffering and death of 8 million animals a year in America. This is a problem for which the cause is well known, the consequences of not solving it are well known, and the tools for solving it are with in reach. And yet, little headway is being made. It is one of the simplest problems to correct.
We hear a lot about increasing adoptions, and this is important; but where is the effort to prevent the overpopulation in the first place? The ASPCA, for example, doesn't even take in strays, so their adoption program, while valuable, is not addressing the problem in a significant way. They inaugurated their "no-kill" policy in order to appeal to more donors. That doesn't mean that animals are not being killed—they are just being killed someplace else. And until the overpopulation problem is solved, this dirty work must be done.
Why is it that almost everyone knows about the ASPCA and HSUS, for example, but, by and large, the public still doesn't know that it is not OK to breed their pets or to allow an accidental breeding? Why don't people know about puppy mills or where pet shop puppies come from? The big organizations have utterly failed to get this message across. Why? They have the funds. In New York City, billboards, subway and bus ads abound. "Think out of the box" is the title under a picture of a puppy or kitten peeking out of an ASPCA carrier. Not one ad, or sign, or billboard informs the public about the overpopulation epidemic and its tragic consequences. Why? Again, the large organizations have failed to convey this important message to the public, in schools and to our elected officials.
Our society is continuing to devote a sizable portion of our existence to finding out the problems that face us and realize that we must re focus our efforts on the TRUE meanings of responsibility, compassion and to understand that even though only one voice, each human is part of a societal choir of sorts that has far reaching consequences for everyone in that given society. I was once told that we can never expect to win the game until all teammates play by the same rules. It certainly holds true in this argument. Nobody within the ranks of these seemingly noble efforts will disagree with the facts that nobody wants to work together. They defend their ideas as if it were a pharmaceutical corporation with a cure for cancer. The compassion issue is everywhere in the animal protection movement. 'Compassion This - Compassion That." But all the large animal protection groups continue to bicker, argue, point fingers and sling mud between themselves. The anger and jealousy and vindictiveness among the smaller rescue organization efforts is mammoth in scope. Unimaginably detrimental to all these efforts is clearly the complete lack of true compassion - at least a real focus on their actual goals. Of course, politics, egos and agendas play a large part in covering up any real compassion that may be earned or even really exists. We are not advocating the end of the big organizations or even the reduction of the six-figure salaries being awarded their chief executives. Why shouldn't someone who saves an animal get paid as well as someone who is willing to send them to slaughter or pave over habitat? But, in any business and most other endeavors, a chief executive who does not do the job is either demoted or fired. The big animal organizations have not done the job. Should they continue toget paid?
Too much of their funding is channeled back into their own development, feeding their own labyrinthine gullets. These organizations have become creatures with bigger and bigger bellies and weaker arms and legs and smaller hearts to get things done. If we were truly compassion driven, we would not be so uninformed as to assume the large national groups were truly out to help the animals with their millions and millions of dollars laying around in bank accounts while much needed and well deserved programs go unfunded and lives continue to be lost. If we were truly compassion driven, we would educate ourselves on the facts of these issues so as to clearly understand our individual roles in prevention.
Sharing the blame and the shame is the American Kennel Club, which issues registration papers indiscriminately to decent breeders and to puppy mills alike. They sponsor the suffering of thousands upon thousands of animals. No big organization wants to take them on. Why? We must admit the problems are ours and ours to solve. Like our fanatical minority and religious leaders, our large animal welfare organizations need their victims. Absent crime and imaginary situations against their people and teachings, these organizations disappear -- this means jobs. Jobs = egos. As long as they can convince those who don't know any better, they will survive. The picture as of today, is one of an overworked under funded and failing animal control effort, schools failing to institute any form of humane education programs into a curriculum at any level, the media won't cover the real stories of HOW to prevent this and see a productive future, their readers don't want the stories of puppies and kittens dying as it's too upsetting to read. Finally, all those who are sitting at their desk right now in any animal protection organizations while reading this are going to be outwardly angered that One would accost them in such a manner, but are not willing to correct the situation as it stands, to ensure they receive a paycheck next week. The major animal welfare organizations are not useless. The world is a better place with them than without them, but they fall short. Too short. To whom much is given, much is expected.
We, however can make the difference we seek. Consider this: It is the shame of the animal rights and animal welfare movements that for more than 130 years we have clamored for laws and policies on behalf of animals, yet have avoided the political arena. Why don't more animal charities form auxiliary political organizations? Why do we not take a stand, role up our sleeves, and set about the hard but necessary work of forming state, county and municipal voting blocks for animals? A voting block of just a few thousand voters can swing a Congressional election. Many statehouse elections are won or lost by 100 or even a dozen votes, as are municipal elections. Lawmakers' fear of such elections gives organized minorities their power. In Connecticut, approximately 2.5 million people are eligible to register to vote. Barely two million have registered, meaning that 20% of the potential electorate has yet to be mobilized.
At the municipal level, anyone who could mobilize even 5% of the voters would direct a force that no politician could ignore. Contact your state elections agency and your local city hall or county seat to get the voter turnout statistics for your own location. The potential for animal advocates to quickly alter the political arithmetic should quickly become evident. As the late U.S. Senator Paul Well-stone put it, "Dare to imagine what politics can be!" And in the last words of early U.S. labor activist Joe Hill, "Don't mourn--organize!"
Back to the large national groups. Two of the major situations that changed my view of the larger groups was first with the HSUS. I logged on to their 'humane teen' site and began to contact all the groups listed there to offer assistance and try to work with them. To my surprise, out of the 16 groups listed, only one was still in operation and functional. Thank goodness, it was the one run by Georgia Benyk in Phoenix, as I felt they were really one of the best I'd ever read about and even had the privilege of meeting her and speaking to her members. I sorta let it slide until I went back to the site almost two years later and the page had not changed one bit. What was going on here?
I made contact with the HSUS and spoke to Bill DeRosa who was in charge of NAHEE the overseeing branch of Humane Teen. He immediately became defensive to my claims and assured me that his staff was working on a daily basis to keep their site current and updated their information with these groups. He was also insulted in the manner of which I approached them, suggesting that a more delicate approach towards them would offer up an improved level of communication in the future, then abruptly hung up the phone and blocked any further emails from me.
Here we are, two years later. I have recently revisited the humane teen site and contacted all the groups listed, (which by the way are totally new except for Georgia's group) Not one of them is a functioning organization and the contacts listed on the page made it clear they were not associated with the HSUS as it was made to look like. They had only given permission for them to list on their page. It is clear it was a shady effort to make the public think this was a project supported by the HSUS. It wasn't.-Thank you Bill. P.S. : Fresh content is added to www.humaneteen.org on a weekly and monthly basis. Bill DeRosaExecutive Director National Association for Humane& Environmental Education (NAHEE)P.O. Box 362East Haddam, CT 06423Phone: (860) 434-8666, ext. 13Fax: (860) 434-9579E-mail: derosa@nahee.org.
Here we are 4 and 1/2 years later and the content has changed only one time. Going from one over inflated webpage with non existent groups, to another false front claim featuring more non existent groups.
Then, several years back, there had been a zoophile that folks had been trying to locate for some time. Not surprisingly, he was located in my immediate area. This is the modern day 'Cherokee Nation'. I made contact with the man behind the alert at PETA and he assured me that we would do what's necessary for an arrest and conviction. He mentioned they would be able to raise approx one million dollars to handle the legal fees. When I asked why he would need so much, his response was that this particular case would only be allotted $100,000 and that all the rest would be used for other projects. ''All organizations do it this way'' he claimed. So, the 'bait and switch' tactic seems to be alive and well in the large animal organizational fundraising efforts.
If you stop and think about it, that is exactly what they have done all along. ''Give us money and we'll save the animals''. With upwards of $5 Billion raised and donated to this group since it's inception in 1954, isn't it fair to assume that, had this been a normal 'for profit' corporation, that consumers would have stopped buying it's products by now with a lack of guarantee and history of false promises such as this.
Unfortunately, it is clear it's largely a bait and switch type approach or we would have been able to recognize more success by now.
A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE FOR YOU AS YOU READ THE FACTS AND FIGURES PROVIDED.
Every other known organization and movement in the nation does the one thing that is preventing the animal protection efforts from having our voices heard in Washington, from being more solid, realizing more universal regulations and from seeing the results so many seek. Just how far would you expect our space program to be today, if they had operated similarly to the animal protection movement and been divided into a dozen large, but warring versions of NASA who refuse to work together & spend only 10% of the funds we provide for them towards the actual space program? Before you read these pages, keep in mind that Americans have spent $1 Billion each year since 1983 on community based animal control efforts. That is $20 billion.
Additionally, we have donated another $1 Billion to our favorite animal protection organizations as they extend their hands asking for more money and ''promise'' to solve these problems. That is another $20 Billion. Most importantly, over 3,000 non profit organizations in this country have logged an estimated 50 Billion man hours on the same efforts and in total, we can only boast a 12-15% reduction of unwanted animal deaths nationwide.
A billion dollars is a difficult number to grasp hold of and comprehend, but a billion seconds ago it was 1971. A billion minutes ago was a few years after Jesus died. Many complain about how far we yet have to go in the animal protection movement. We don't have that far to go!!!! We know what the solutions are and we know how to stop the problems. We just need to stop following the large national groups who have a vested interest in keeping these problems alive and running the rest of us in circles. The next time you hear how the animal protection movement has taken in $2 billion each year and over $40 "billion" since 1983 casually, think about whether you want that movement spending your money so freely with so few results (other than, new cars, luxury office suites and retirement plans)
America's problems with animal abuse and overpopulation is far worse than most other industrialized nations. Also, American's spend MORE on the ''corrections' than anyone else, but still fall very short of our goals. If these guys make $300,000 a year, why would they want to find a solution? They'd be out of work. $40 BILLION ago, we had the same problems we do today but 12% greater. We deserve better in 20 years and $40 billion of OUR MONEY than a measly 12% reduction!!!!. We need to do things differently. We need to do things RIGHT.
American SPCA TYPE AES DONATED & EARNED INCOME: $ 39,120,286 EXPENDITURES: $ 41,357,094 PROGRAM SERVICE: $ 32,633,889 FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION: $ 8,723,205 % FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION, AS DECLARED: 21%% FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION, OUR ANALYSIS: 29% TOTAL ASSETS: $ 53,983,597 TANGIBLE (DEPRECIABLE) ASSETS: $ 19,816,877CASH & SECURITIES: $ 27,394,209NOTE:The American SPCA assets include $12.8 million in "beneficial interests in perpetual trusts held by others." They do this to hide funds as best they can. The ASPCA in 2002 distributed $1.1 million among 182 other animal care organizations. Compensation info--LARRY HAWK President ASPCA $421,970 (Included four-year performance bonus. Hawk left the ASPCA in April 2003 and now heads the Massachusetts SPCA.)Steven R Hansen SrVP ASPCA $139,657Stephen Musso SrVP/Ops ASPCA $136,142Stephen Zawistowski SrVP ASPCA $134,902Barbara Garber SrVP ASPCA $132,140Stephen Eudene SrVP/CFO ASPCA $127,890Total $2 millionThe ASPCA paid 80 additional salaries over $50,000 in 2002. (Over $4 million dollars)Executive salaries paid over $6 million
North Shore Animal League America TYPE: S DONATED & EARNED INCOME: $ 30,342,594 EXPENDITURES: $ 32,397,432 PROGRAM SERVICE: $ 21,586,126 FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION: $ 10,811,306 % FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION, AS DECLARED: 33% % FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION, OUR ANALYSIS: 49% TOTAL ASSETS: $ 21,586,126 TANGIBLE (DEPRECIABLE) ASSETS: $ 11,851,646 CASH & SECURITIES: $ 18,443,960 NOTE: The Pet Savers Foundation is a North Shore Animal League America subsidiary, sponsoring Spay/USA and the Conference on Homeless Animal Management and Policy. Pet Savers had an operating loss of $175,502.Compensation info--JOHN STEVENSON Pres North Shore $347,091Barry Giaquinto CFO North Shore $140,047Perry Fina DirOps North Shore $129,806Lisa Wilson DirDevlp North Shore $100,351Carolyn Brown DVM North Shore $ 98,960 Atlee Douglas DVM North shore $ 92,999Total Nearly $1 million The North Shore Animal League America paid 24 additional salaries in excess of $50,000 in fiscal 2002. ($600,000 extra) Executive Salaries paid over $1.6 million -( not even a national organization or widely recognized)-
Humane Society of the U.S.TYPE: AEWDONATED & EARNED INCOME: $ 65,222,618EXPENDITURES: $ 67,272,795PROGRAM SERVICE: $ 38,620,876FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION: $ 23,453,737% FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION, AS DECLARED: 35%% FUNDRAISING & ADMINISTRATION, OUR ANALYSIS: 53%TOTAL ASSETS: $ 85,810,587TANGIBLE (DEPRECIABLE) ASSETS: $ 8,570,833CASH & SECURITIES: $ 80,786,874NOTE:The Humane Society of the U.S. transferred $5,198,882 to subsidiaries, including the Wildlife Land Trust, Humane Society International, Center for Respect For Life & Environment, Earthvoice International, National Association for Humane & Environmental Education, Meadowcreek Inc. (an Arkansas-based organic vegetable-growing project), and Worldwide Network, Inc. Since the end of 2001 HSUS has also absorbed the Ark Trust, producers of the Genesis Awards for animal-friendly screen productions, and now sponsors the Remote Access Medical project headed by Eric Davis, DVM, who formerly operated under the auspices of the University of Tennessee. In addition, HSUS in mid-2002 took over fiscal responsibility for maintaining Keiko, the orca star of the Free Willy! films, whose care had been funded by Ocean Futures, formed by merger of the Jean Michel Cousteau Institute with the Free Willy/Keiko Foundation. Keiko swam to Norway soon after HSUS took over his supervision. There he lived in coastal fjords until his death on December 12, 2003. HSUS paid $264,073 to the Free Willy/Keiko Foundation in 2002. HSUS made $1,321,527 in grants and payments in 2002 to 271 animal charities and projects in all. Compensation info--PAUL IRWIN President HSUS $315,898 Patricia Forkan ExecVP HSUS $179,217Andrew Rowan SeniorVP HSUS $170,995G Thomas Waite CFO/Treas HSUS $160,473Roger Kindler GenCounsel HSUS $152,767John Grandy VP HSUS $145,124Jan Hartke ExecDirector HSUS $133,517John Kullberg WldlfLandTrst HSUS $131,453 (John Kullberg died in April 2003.)Michael Fox SeniorScholar HSUS $128,419Wayne Pacelle SeniorVP HSUS $124,745Janet Frake AsstSecty HSUS $ 82,514TOTAl $4,541,000The Humane Society of the U.S. paid 60 additional salaries in excess of $50,000 in 2002. (Excess of $3 million more) Executive Salaries paid over $7.5 million

Animal People News is widely respected and recognized as the 'watchdog' reporting publication for the world's animal protection movement. News for People Who Care About  Animals POB 960 Clinton, Washington email anmlpepl@whidbey.com website www.animalpeoplenews.org
Out of a total of 136 organizations listed in the most recent edition of Animal People News December 2003 - 3, here are a few of the more recognized groups along with some financial information. For the full layout and explanation, please subscribe to Animal People News or visit their website above. ORGANIZATION $ EARNED IN 2003 NET ASSETS TANGIBLE ASSETS
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$10,764,9618,901,0222,692,768 ASPCA39,120,28653,983,597 19,816,877
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND2,786,313 2,407,03266,576
BEST FRIENDS UTAH17,902,45520,885,8954,982,378
DELTA RESCUE6,141,3975, 350,6402,690,428
DORIS DAY ANIMAL LEAGUE2,359,853753,186 16,185 ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE43,127,154 49,159,966
FARM SANCTUARY 3,116,750 4,088,219 2,598,596
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES 65,222,618 85,810,58780,786,874
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE30,342,59421,586,12618,443,960 PETA 16,466,199 5,079,1203,690,686
PETSMART CHARITIES11,976,473 7,215,975 6,354,905
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY 102,271,637550,070,491360,594,372
DONATIONS FOR 2003 --> 351,598,690 Just for the 13 listed. There are over 3,000 non profits in America dedicated to this effort!!! $351 Million + and we still see little in the way of resolve. And this is only about one third of the annual dollars donated to people's favorite animal protection groups.
Now, look how a concerted effort would make a change and cost pennies on the dollar. A one-time expenditure of $50 million would bring humane education to our nations' schools.
Although Americans have been donating a billion dollars annually to their favorite animal protection group (that's AFTER the nearly one billion they also pay in taxes for local and area animal control efforts) for over 25 years, we still see few tangible results.
I am so determined to prove that my idea is a likely solution to many if not most of our problems, that I have outlined it to the best of my ability. We may need to include in this budget the cost for professional research to offer the educators, who don't care about humane education but do care about science, math and reading test scores, that our program can improve all of the above. So, with $2 billion each year going mainly to salaries, condos, jet planes, office buildings and printing costs to raise more funds for next year, I'm asking for just $50 million on a one time basis to start this idea rolling on a nationwide scale that will undoubtedly prove its cause worthy.
However, thus far, I've not even been able to fill the $50 million costs. Each State would receive money for advertising in all newspapers that serve communities of 20,000 residents or more. These stats would be from the most recent census. The ads would be larger than the average ad to garner attention. With this endeavor, it is hoped that we would gain substantial media attention as well - helping to further our cause of gaining the attention of all those who believe in humane education and would be willing to volunteer in some way. We would have several packages of information to send out. I would also send one for the person who is organizing the program (i.e. Program Coordinator) and another for the people who would actually go into the schools with me. My informational packet would outline every possible need and the steps to take.
Therefore, I would be responsible for long distance calls, printing, envelopes and postage costs. Obviously, I need the funds to complete these tasks. These funds could also include supplying people with some travel expenses or a post office box rental, etc. It would be very important to assure the continuation of the local marketing for volunteers for up to two years after the initial local programs begin for simple attrition. We would want them to run this as a volunteer 'business' and to become non profit.
From that point on, they could be named anything they wanted and continue getting grants at will. NOBODY anywhere is doing anything along these lines at all. Everyone is too wrapped up in their own little efforts (noble, but highly individualized) to really recognize the need for change or the importance of having a human being who will actually address tomorrow's decision makers is person with some 'live aides' to make it interesting.
MOST EVERY ''humane education'' organization is still just a bunch of paper pushers. They offer materials on their website, but that is no guarantee ANYONE is reading it or putting it to use. Others pride themselves by sending thousands and thousands of copies of an animal magazine to schools. Still no real proof that they are being read by any students. All are supportive of Humane Education and will do class presentations when asked, but don't go looking for them and many even charge for their services.
We'll use 100 communities in each state for a guideline and simplification for this time. COSTS: The simple breakdown of costs is provided below:50 states times 100 communities = 5,000 community newspapers. Each with an ad in their main paper every Sunday for 50 weeks. That is 250,000 ads to run with each ad running $100. That's $25 million right there. Packages of info: Brochure costs: $3 each (copies of additional info included cost would be $2 each). Envelopes would cost an additional 50 cents each and postage would be $1, totaling $6.50Each city would need up to 10 of the start up packages. That is $ 325,000. Each city could ask for up to 100 volunteer kits at $8 each (additional info included from start up) $4million. I would still need to add in long distance phone charges and other miscellaneous items. My tour will cost $175,000 including motor home, gas, insurance, printing and food. After the tour, I can donate the motor home or resell it to get some money back.
Follow-up marketing for ads in newspapers to cover attrition and misc expenses would be included $12million (half of the original $25million)Total so far is only $42million. Access to any and all information distributed would be available online from my site. No charge. I don't want to ask for a penny that I won't need. I want to CLEARLY PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that humane education has its place in a civilized society and that it has benefits that are visible within 5 years of start up and even more at the ten year span.
Still have questions? See the following article really lays it all out clearly. What IS The Humane Society of the United States? By Christopher Aust August 2004
I was rather amazed at the number of people who wrote to me about my opinions regarding the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) when I did my last few articles. Then again, maybe I shouldn't be. Before about two weeks ago, I myself was rather ignorant as to the real goals of HSUS, and where their, (actually your) money goes. As I always do though, I decided to edumacate myself about them. I also conducted a poll of 100 average people. Just the average Joe in the street. 94% of the people thought HSUS ran the local shelters in their community. 4% knew about their other programs and the remaining 2% had no idea who they were. Of the 94% all said they would donate to HSUS based on what they knew about them. I'm betting HSUS is banking, literally, on these types of individuals.
I also went online and found some rather interesting, at times quite scary, information on several web sites. I would have interviewed a HSUS representative, but after last week's newsletter, I got an email from one that was little more than hate mail and very offensive! Founders Coleman Burke, then president of the American Bible Society, Cleveland Amory and Helen Jones, founded HSUS in 1954. As far as I have been able to tell, Mr. Burke served as their President until 1970 when John Hoyt, a Presbyterian minister, took over as President and CEO until 1996. Until just a few months ago, the President and CEO was Paul Irwin, a Methodist minister.
The current CEO and President is Wayne Pacelle who admittedly has had ties with some radical (and I mean radical) animal rights groups in the past. Now, is it important I mention the religious background? Maybe and maybe not. What I noticed though is the organization, at least to me, has an evangelical feel. Is this a bad thing? No. I don't see why unless you are running the finances in a manner similar to Jim and Tammie Faye Baker! That sure is the way it looks to me. Officers and Directors HSUS is an organization with their primary focus being animals.
As I reviewed the names and titles of the Board Officers and Directors, I found it curious they had no DVM's (vets) on either. They have three MDs', three PhDs' and six attorneys. Am I the only one that finds this odd? Plenty of lawyers, but no vet. Hmmm… Maybe it's just a typo. Comparative Financial Operations Report When I conducted my interview with Kathy Bauch a few weeks ago, she refused to answer any questions regarding HSUS' finances for a “newsletter.” She did offer to send me their 2003 financials though. This is what they send whenever someone has questions about their finances.
As I mentioned last week, if it was similar to what they have online, it would be vague and difficult to decipher. What I got was much more. What I received is their 2003 Annual Report. It is a twenty-one page “report” that was obviously very expensive to print. Tucked way in the back is exactly what I expected. A vague and difficult to read one page financial report. The rest appears to me to be a very expensive sales letter and nothing more, complete with a postage paid envelope to send in your donation.
Now you might say, “So what? They have to promote themselves.” I agree. However, this publication has six pages of calendar quality photos of nothing but animals. Two and a half pages of self-glorifying articles from HSUS staff, none of which was necessary. How much donor money could have been saved by deleting this junk from the thousands and thousands of these reports they printed? According to the Comparative Financial Operations Report for 2003, the HSUS has $116,205,882.00 in total liability and net assets. Over $5,000,000 of that is in cash and cash equivalents, and another nearly five and a half million in receivables. They also have nearly $93,000,000 in market value investments. Not too bad. In 2003, in revenue, additions and transfers, HSUS made $76,923,670. Of that amount, sheltering programs received $10,551,527 and it was shared with animal habitat and wildlife programs.
Now, assuming it was an even split, sheltering programs received $3,517,175.66 Now that's a lot of money, but not when you consider a good sized shelter can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to run, three million is really a drop in the bucket. They spent $21,145,769.00 in fundraising and membership development. Six times what they put into their shelter programs, which is what most people I talked to think HSUS does with the money donated to them. Providing Help or Selling It.
I'm not sure what they spent the money on for their shelter programs, but I will assure you they didn't fund any shelters. In fact, they charge shelters and Animal Control offices for their assistance and instructional material. I have been able to find little and or nothing HSUS doesn't charge for when it comes to helping a shelter and their educational programs. For instance, lets say you or your town runs an animal shelter that is struggling for one reason or another, which most are, HSUS is ready to come in and help. For between $4000.00 and $20,000.00 they will send their experts to your shelter through their Animal Services Consultation Program. The fee depends on the size of the agency and the complexity of its programs, charged on a sliding scale based on your agency's resources.
In other words, the more you have, the more they'll take. Youth Programs Now, lets go back to our youth. You're in middle or high school and want to start a club to promote rescue and do things to help companion animals. HSUS can help you with that, too. Just go to humaneteen.org. There you can buy a package full of all kinds of propaganda and learn to be a full-fledged animal activist. They will sell your child a club starter kit for $22.00 and then give activity suggestions like their “Fight Fur” program.
Here they encourage kids to make flyers and hand them out in front of businesses to protest against shoppers buying fur. HSUS will also give your child cards to distribute at such events. They'll show your child pictures of dead animals in traps and direct them to other sites where they can see pictures of hunters beating seals over the head. They will also promote vegen/vegetarian lifestyles to your child. Just go to the message board for kids and you can read how many of the kids are distressed, after reading the material HSUS SOLD them, because their parents will not let them go vegen. You will also see posts promoting PETA! Now I want to be fair here. They do have some decent material that is age appropriate and educational in nature. I think it's overpriced; for instance, your child can rent a video to show their class for $25.00, but some of it is good material. However, there is little promoting appropriate training, grooming or responsible ownership of companion animals. It seems to me the whole focus is turning our children into activists, vegens and extremists. Now if I want my child to be a vegen, or an activist, I will make that decision and not HSUS. Our kids have enough on their plate without having to be weighed down with this information or agenda.
Additionally, kids are kids and don't always make appropriate decisions. When dealing with complex issues like activism and protesting, it would be easy for them to get into trouble or hurt. Doesn't PETA target children too? Ethical Financial Practices Let's get back to the money: Former President John Hoyt once instructed his members on becoming more humane: “We begin, I suggest, by living more simply, more sparingly.” Let's see how he did.
He made around $200,000.00 in the late 1980's running HSUS. In 1986, HSUS bought his house in Maryland for $310,000 and allowed him and his family to live there, free of rent, until 1992. When he retired as CEO, HSUS gave him a $1,000,000.00 bonus. Paul Irwin, another former President, while making $300,000.00 from HSUS, was given an $85,000.00 interest free loan to renovate his cabin in Maine. The cabin was held in trust by HSUS, however his family continued to use it until he died. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Makes me wonder. Guilty by Association Let's look at some of HSUS' associations: In April of 2000 HSUS sent J.P. Goodwin as its emissary on an anti-fur mission to China. Goodwin is not just any animal rights zealot, he was an avowed member of Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a group once called one of the biggest domestic terrorist organizations by the FBI.
He had been convicted for vandalism of several fur retailers and their property. Less than a year later, he was formerly identified as a HSUS legislative staff member. If you don't know about ALF you should check them out. They truly scare the heck out of me. They are, in my opinion, every bit as much a threat to people as Al Quiada.
I cannot believe HSUS would hire such a person. When asked questions about an arson fire at a slaughter house in Petaluma, California, and a Utah feed co-op that nearly killed a family, Goodwin stated, “We're ecstatic!” Then, there is the PETA connection ... HSUS has repeatedly hired PETA employees in their organization. Their head of investigations, several investigators, a computer programmer, just to name a few. Sorry folks, my opinion is, once a terrorist, always a terrorist. When HSUS hires these people, they appear to support the crimes these individuals may have been involved in. In 2003, HSUS VP Martin Stephens was asked to recommend three people to serve on an EPA “pollution prevention and toxics” panel. Two of his three choices were PETA employees.
All Talk and No Action While HSUS will admit they don't run or fund any shelters, you usually find it at the bottom of the page or tucked away somewhere near the end of a statement. As I mentioned before, they don't put their money where their mouth is. Get this … In 1995, when the Washington DC animal shelter was going to have to close due to a budget shortfall, HSUS (based in DC) offered to build and operate a DC shelter at its own expense to serve as a national model. There were, of course, conditions. HSUS wanted the city to give it 3-5 acres of land and tax exempt status for all of its real estate holdings in the District of Columbia. (Remember, they buy some executives homes to live in among other property holdings.)
The DC government offered a long-term lease but HSUS refused to proceed unless it would “own absolutely” the land. The district declined, and the only HSUS funded animal shelter never materialized. HSUS, who makes and has enough money to fund a shelter in every state, as well as subsidize spay/neuter programs, declined to help the dogs in its own back yard. Why? Money is all I can think of. Perhaps they were afraid they would soil their Armani suits by actually working with a dog. The New CEO Rather than go on a tirade about the new President and CEO of HSUS, I have put some quotes from him below. Read them, and you decide. "I think they wanted the aggressive approach," he says. "They wanted someone who was going to think things up.
And they got him." June 2004, Washington Post when asked about his selection as CEO. “We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Quoted in Animal People, May, 1993 Overview I could go on for days about HSUS, but I will stop here. In my opinion, they are little more than an organization whose main agenda is filling the coffers and pushing an extremist agenda through misinformation and exploitation. Again, my opinion, they have done nothing but profit from the contributions of people who don't know any better. I have tried to see it otherwise, I simply can't. I highly recommend you go to activistcash.com and see what they have there about HSUS and their connection with PETA. There are several other sites I found interesting, as well as many stories about HSUS in the archive of the Washington Post. Would I give anything to the Humane Society of the United States? Yes I would. A pooper-scooper, they can use to go clean my yard. At least then we would know they actually have done something for a dog this year. This article may be republished using the following attribution box: ------------ Copyright ©2004 Christopher Aust, Master Dog Trainer & Creator: The Natural Cooperative Training System (NCTS) for Dogs The Instinctual Development System (IDS) for Puppies Subscribe to the BARK 'n' SCRATCH Newsletter: subscribe@Master-Dog-Training.com VISIT NOW: http://www.Master-Dog-Training.com
Then, this article in the report from the Public Citizen Foundation's NewsletterFrom The Center For Consumer Freedom Comes. Better Business Bureau says charities should retain about 65 percent of the funds they raise. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), which disguises its animal rights activism in the cloak of animal welfare, lost $173,726 this year as it continued its pattern of dubious fundraising practices. The Money Pit, Charity Edition. A new report from New York's attorney general notes that several food activist groups actually lost money during fundraising efforts in the Big Apple. The state's top law enforcement official warned: "This report is a reminder to make informed decisions before contributing hard-earned dollars to charity." Keeping in mind that the Better Business Bureau says charities should retain about 65 percent of the funds they raise, consider these financially unsound donations from New York: The anti-biotech activists at Friends of the Earth kept less than 11 percent of the money raised in its name. The Ralph Nader-founded Public Citizen Foundation lost $86,853 with one fundraiser company (a negative 243 percent return on investment). The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), which disguises its animal rights activism in the cloak of animal welfare, lost $173,726 this year as it continued its pattern of dubious fundraising practices. According to previous reports from New York's attorney general, fundraising company Share Group Inc. kept $2.18 million between 1999 and 2000, and passed on only $273,560 to HSUS -- a return rate of only 11 percent. In New York, Share Group only gave HSUS $16,543 of the $1.08 million it raised during the year 2000 -- a return of only 1.53 percent.
This dismal record probably did not surprise HSUS: in 1996, Share raised $60,045 for the group and returned nothing. A 2001 Letter of Agreement between the two groups shows that HSUS agreed to a minimum guarantee of only 1 percent of the gross receipts. The Illinois Attorney General's office reports that HSUS paid Share Group over $1.87 million for 2001 fundraising that netted less than $750,000 to the animal-rights group in that state -- a negative 150 percent return.
It's too much to hope that these groups will fundraise themselves right out of business, but there are steps individuals can take. Sign our petition to the IRS commissioner seeking to revoke the tax-exempt status of the violence-promoting "charity" People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. And be sure to tell your friends and family to avoid throwing hard-earned wages into a money pit. Source: http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_detail.cfm/headline/2714 Considering The HSUS Dubious Fundraising Practices, shouldn't the Attorney General's Office Hold The HSUS To A Higher Standard?
More Battles of 'Words' while animals continue to suffer. More than a half-century ago, noted science fiction author Isaac Asimovbegan his acclaimed series of Robot novels, examining increasingly complex interactions between humans and robots in a future world. Asimov's underlying premise for the books was that robots had advanced sufficiently to become sentient beings. Questions raised by this development include whether robots should be granted legal rights, and if so, what those rights should be. Less fanciful, but no less complicated, is the current national debate about animal rights, the resolution of which could result in a comprehensive restructuring of the legal relationship between humans and animals. The controversy is centered on the question of whether humans should be allowed to own animals as property, or whether humans should be legally defined as guardians of the animals in their care.
There are no easy answers to the question, and the intuitive response might lead to unintended consequences. The Status Quo. With few exceptions, animals are, and always have been, treated as thepersonal property of their owners by courts and lawmakers. The Uniform Commercial Code (a code of laws governing commercial transactions that has been adopted in nearly all states), for example, includes animals (and unborn young) among the "goods" that can be the subject of business contracts. Kentucky statutes, for example, specifically define a licensed dog as the "property" of the owner, and other jurisdictions have similar laws. This well-established property status means that animals legally can be raised for profit or pleasure; bought, sold, or leased; exchanged or given away; put on exhibition or used in races, sports, and other competitions; and disposed of when appropriate or necessary.
Status as property does not mean that an animal is nothing more than the legal equivalent of a refrigerator, an automobile, or a computer, however. While generally defining animals as personal property, the law also recognizes that animals represent a particular class of property and imposes attendant obligations on an animal's owner. In recognition of the fact that animals are living creatures generally dependent on their owners for care, a legal niche is carved out to provide them with additional legal protection. Kentucky law in this regard is typical of the laws in most states. The ownerof an animal is guilty of cruelty in the first degree if he or she uses theanimal for fighting, a felony with a maximum punishment of five years in prison. There also is a legal obligation to provide adequate food, water,and shelter for animals, and a legal prohibition against torture, mutilation, neglect, and other mistreatment. There are numerous exceptions, including hunting and fishing, food processing, veterinary care, and bonafide medical research, for example, and most cruelty offenses that do not involve animal fights are charged as misdemeanors. (A recent change inKentucky state law elevates the punishment for second and subsequentconvictions of torturing a dog or cat to a felony.) In a majority of states, as in Kentucky, at least some instances of crueltyto animals are punished as felonies. It probably is fair to say, however,that animal cruelty offenses generally are classified as misdemeanors, witha penalty of no more than 12 months in jail or, more likely, only a fine. Another consequence of animals' status as personal property is a general limitation on an owner's potential monetary recovery when an animal is killed. If the death of an animal results from an intentional act, or through the negligence of another person, the owner generally must seek compensation in a civil lawsuit for the destruction of property, rather than for wrongful death, which is the usual legal remedy for the death of a person. If the lawsuit alleging destruction of property succeeds in court, recovery generally is limited to the fair market value, or the replacement value, of the animal. Non-Economic Damages In a few states, however, statutes specifically allow recovery for so-called non-economic damages following the death of an animal. A recently enacted Tennessee law, for example, allows the owner of a pet to recover up to $4,000 beyond the economic value of the animal if certain conditions are met. To recover, the owner must establish that the animal's death was the result of another person's actions that were both unlawful and intentional or negligent, and that the death occurred while the animal was on the owner's property or under his or her supervision. Illinois also allows pet owners to recover for non-economic damages, including emotional distress, for the death of an animal in certain limited circumstances.
Similar legislation has passed or is pending in a small number of other jurisdictions. Against this legal framework, in which animals are considered personal property and protected primarily through anti-cruelty laws, several different approaches to animal protection have emerged. Redefining the Status of Animals There can be no genuine controversy surrounding the proposition that animals deserve proper care and that they should be protected from mistreatment and abuse. The dispute arises over how the interests and well-being of animals can be best served. For the traditionalist, the road to protection of animals is paved with better owner education, more well-equipped and well-funded shelters, harsher penalties for animal cruelty convictions, and vigorous enforcement of existing anti-cruelty laws.
At the other end of the spectrum, extreme animal rights activists launch violent attacks on commercial animal operations and facilities where animals are used in research, destroying property and releasing animals. The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), for example, are considered part of a "serious terrorist threat," according to James F.Jarboe, Domestic Terrorism Section Chief of the FBI's Counterterrorism Division. Testifying before Congress in February 2002, Jarboe reported that ALF and ELF members committed some 600 criminal acts in this country during the preceding six years, with damages in excess of $43 million. A third approach, certainly more middle-of-the-road than the actions of ALF and ELF, but still well outside the mainstream, is a legal restructuring of the traditional owner-property relationship between humans and animals. Advocates are urging state and municipal lawmakers to rewrite their rules, substituting the word "guardian" for "owner" wherever possible in laws that affect animals. The purpose of the wording change, according to its advocates, is to instill a greater sense of respect and compassion for  animals. This, in turn, could lead to a reduction in animal abuse. The guardian movement had its genesis in 1995 at the 11th annual Summit for the Animals held in St. Louis, Mo. Representatives from 47 national organizations approved several resolutions there, including one styled "Adopting Language that Recognizes Animals as Individuals and Not as Property or Things."
This resolution put forward the proposition that "animals are not property to be used for the benefit or whim of humans." In Defense of Animals, a Mill Valley, California-based, non-profit animal rights advocacy organization headed by veterinarian Elliot Katz, DVM, soon took up the cause with its nationwide Guardian campaign: "They are not our property...we are not their owners." The first serious attempt to effect a regulatory change from "owner" to" guardian" failed in San Francisco, but a similar measure was adopted shortly thereafter, in July 2000, by the City Council in Boulder, Colo.
Since then, a half-dozen other cities have revamped their municipal codes to include references to animal "guardians." Rhode Island followed suit in 2001, becoming the first state to amend its laws to recognize human guardianship of animals. Rhode Island General Law Section 4-1-1(4) now states that a "Guardian shall mean a person(s) having the same rights and responsibilities of an owner, and both terms shall be used interchangeably. A guardian shall also mean a person who possesses, has title to or an interest in, harbors or has control, custody or possession of an animal and who is responsible for an animal's safety and well-being."
Adding the word "guardian" to a state or municipal law, especially when the law allows "guardian" and "owner" to be used interchangeably, sounds innocent enough. After all, many animal owners already treat their animals more like members of the family than as property, and being called guardians rather than owners is not likely to make them more responsive to the animals' needs. Some activists also argue that the change in language will reduce the incidence of animal abuse, by making owners feel more responsible for their animals. This might be wishful thinking, however, considering that child abuse continues at an alarming rate despite the unquestioned responsibility parents and guardians have for the welfare of their children. Strong criticism of the policy shift has emerged from seemingly unlikely sources. In May 2003, for example, the Executive Board of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) approved a position statement opposing guardianship language. The official AVMA position reads: "Ownership vs. Guardianship: "The American Veterinary Medical Association promotes the optimal health and well-being of animals. Further, the AVMA recognizes the role of responsible owners in providing for their animals' care. Any change in terminology describing the relationship between animals and owners does not strengthen this relationship and may, in fact, diminish it. Such changes in terminology may decrease the ability of veterinarians to provide services and, ultimately, result in animal suffering."
The Board of Directors of the American Kennel Club (AKC) adopted a similar resolution in 2003, stating in part that, the "AKC believes that the term guardian may in fact reduce the legal status and value of dogs and thereby restrict the rights of owners, veterinarians, and government agencies to protect and care for dogs. It may also subject them to frivolous and expensive litigation. The term guardian does nothing to promote more responsible treatment of dogs." Similar opposition has been voiced by groups including the Cat Fancier's Association, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, the National Animal Interest Alliance, the Responsible Pet Owners Alliance, and the American Veterinary Medical Law Association. Equine organizations appear to have remained silent to this point.
"What's the problem?" you might reasonably ask at this point. Anything that makes people more conscious of the fact that animals are not a disposable commodity and should not be abused must be a good thing. What could go wrong? So far, nothing. Laws in Rhode Island and in the cities that have adopted guardianship language appear to allow "owner" and "guardian" to be used interchangeably, with the same rights and obligations attached to each. None of the revised laws have been in force long enough to know for certain whether the change is cosmetic or substantive. There is no doubt, however, that such mixed usage fails to recognize that owner and guardian have legally distinct, and very different, meanings.
The owner of property, according to Black's Law Dictionary and an enormous body of legal precedent, has the right to "enjoy" the property, and to "do with it as he pleases, even to spoil or destroy it, as far as the law permits." It is this bundle of rights, and the potential for harm, that make necessary laws that recognize the unique status of animals and that protect them from cruelty, abuse, and neglect. A guardian, on the other hand, is a horse of an entirely different color.
Strictly speaking, again according to Black's Law Dictionary and the courts, a guardian is a person who has both the legal right and legal responsibility to take care of another person who is incapable of taking care of himself or herself. Adults who are incompetent for some reason and minor children are examples of individuals who require guardians. The subject of a guardian's care is the guardian's "ward." A guardian also might have a fiduciary duty to the ward, which simply means a legal responsibility to act in the ward's best interest, even at the expense of the guardian's interests. Guardians and owners, in other words, are fundamentally different, mutually exclusive entities. Owners own property, guardians protect the rights of incompetent individuals, and a law that uses the terms interchangeably is a legal contradiction. The potential ramifications of this clear legal distinction between "owner" and "guardian" are enormous.
Assume, for a moment, that "guardian" is not merely another name for "owner," and that a person actually can become the guardian of an animal in the strict legal sense. Implicit in this assumption must be the fact that the object of the guardian's care and responsibility, an animal, now becomes the guardian's ward, with associated legal rights that must be protected. Any meaningful change in status from an animal owner to an animal guardian must, at some point, also encompass a change in the status of the animal from property to ward.
Under the current state of the law, which recognizes only property and persons, the animal thus would assume the same legal rights as a child or incompetent adult. If an animal is someone's property, the animal can be bought and sold, a simple legal transaction that results in a change of owner. If, on the other hand, the animal has the legal status of a ward with rights that must be protected, it is difficult to imagine a situation in which the animal legally could be sold (or even given away) by its guardian. Animal adoptions also would become far more complicated and expensive. Under current law it is possible, in some situations, to justify the euthanasia of an animal for economic reasons, such as an illness requiring lengthy and expensive veterinary care.
Euthanasia in this circumstance no longer would be an option if the caretaker is a guardian and the animal enjoys the legal status of a ward. It also is easy to imagine an argument that it is not in the best interest of a Thoroughbred to be raced as a 2-year-old, or at all, or that dogs should not be exhibited at shows or used in field trial competitions, or that zoos violate the rights of their inhabitants.
Commercial animal breeding in any form certainly would violate the legal rights of an animal ward, as would human consumption of animals for food and the use of animals in medical research. These scenarios might sound quite far-fetched, and the possible outcomes might not be obvious consequences of the seemingly innocuous substitution of one word for another in a few laws. Nevertheless, a dramatic restructuring of the human-animal relationship is the stated agenda of some animal rights activists. Whatever your opinion on the status of animals, your support of, or opposition to, the guardian movement should be an informed choice, based on fact rather than supposition. Courts frequently use the phrase "slippery slope" to describe a course of action that, once it is started, cannot easily be halted. Depending on how lawmakers and courts eventually interpret the true meaning of an animal guardian, the movement toward animal guardianship might be such a slope.

THE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY OF TOO MANY ANIMAL CONTROL AGENCIES IS BEING BROUGHT INTO QUESTION FINALLY!!

Originally this was a topic I was not going to discuss. But in order to show a clear overall picture of all that needs changing, it must be included for review. I have a difficult time believing that Animal Pounds all over the U.S. kill the dogs/puppies/cats/kittens and other animals simply due to LACK OF space within their buildings. Much of my findings on several agencies such as Riverside County CA for example, along with many others as well, is that the remains of the animals are sold for FOOD CONSUMPTION AND OTHER USES. There's big money to BE made from all of this. It's called greed and power over those who cannot defend themselves. So, when I SEE OR HEAR THAT
1.) POUNDS DO NOT Want to have proper hours for the public to see/observe/have time with the animal IN ORDER TO RESCUE/ADOPT
2.) POUNDS SETTING forth RIDICULOUS HOURS for deadline toward the animal's rescue or adoption.
3.) DOG WARDENS/MANAGERS REFUSING TO ADMIT how many dogs have been killed on their kill days
4.) POUNDS/DOG WARDEN Specifically stating that THEY WEREN'T present when the dogs die in the gas chambers, are shot or Lord knows how they are killed.
5.) POUNDS/PERSONNEL PEOPLE/LEADERS OF ANIMAL ORGANIZATIONS using manipulation to sway the public and out right lie---THEN MY ANTENNAS GO UP THAT SOMETHING IS VERY DANGEROUSLY WRONG. AS ANIMAL ADVOCATES AND ACTIVISTS, WE HAVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH FROM THE ROTTEN LIES. THE ANIMAL'S LIFE DEPENDS ON IT.
6.) POLITICAL POSITIONING must be kept out if animals are to be saved from the continuous atrocities at the hands of HUMANS. I've known this for years. I actually (my attorney) got into the records of Riverside County, CA and were able to prove that they did these things for those very reasons. They would adopt SPOT for $48, but if the dog didn't get adopted, the taxpayers were charged $109 to kill it. That is why they avoid working during hours that are accessible to the public, why they never try to drum up more adoptees, why they are always so vague when asked about their numbers and business plans.
They do everything possible to hassle good, caring and responsible rescuers with laws and fees and fines. But who ever wishes to have a litter or two are simply allowed to continue without any rules, restrictions or even reading materials. They were even able to get around the mandatory spay and neuter laws in place in several states by offering 'certificates'' for the people to do it themselves, knowing full well that the majority would never take the time or make the effort. We also must keep in mind that they are treated like crap by everyone in the community INCLUDING THEIR BOSSES which is usually the county board of supervisors. They are underpaid, overworked and frequently hire people right out of jail, or off the street with no education and are expected to handle the incredible numbers of animals that irresponsible humans relinquish into their care.

Troubles so very prevalent in our animal control agencies across the nation and nobody really takes the time to step in and make the necessary changes. This is a HUGE problem all over the country, as we've read about in Riverside County, CA - especially with the LEAF organization in Lake Elsinore with politics, agendas and egos.
Stu Bykofsky | PACCA blistered in expert's study
LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY CITED
MASSIVE problems at the Philadelphia Animal Care and Control Association revealed by the Daily News last year can be explained by one big word - accountability.
There is none, says Nathan J. Winograd, the animal shelter expert brought in by the problem-plagued agency to analyze its operations and write a report guiding PACCA to "no kill" status within 10 years.
The day before he left Philadelphia after a 15-day immersion in PACCA, Winograd gave me an exclusive review of what he found.
"There are incredible inefficiencies here that result in killing too many animals," says Winograd, a former California deputy district attorney who lives in San Diego with a wife, two kids, two dogs and eight cats.
Over and over he repeated "PACCA has to clean house," and he wasn't talking about the oft-dirty animal cages.
In how many ways is PACCA deficient? Let Winograd count the ways: "No written protocols, no adequate staff training, no adequate staff supervision, no accountability, no integrity in the data or operations, an inadequate adoption program, no pre-adoption sterilization," he ticks off.
Quite a laundry list for what's been called the PACCA House of Horrors, where some animals are put down within minutes of their arrival, where others vanish and where animals and the public routinely are abused.
Narrow it down, Nathan."Accountability is Number One. It's the thread that runs through every aspect of shelter operations," the 44-year-old Winograd says.
PACCA deserves credit for hiring Winograd to write a prescription for what's likely to be bitter public medicine for the shelter, especially since management was in denial for a long time. The Nov. 4 City Council hearing requested by Councilman Jack Kelly probably provided a wakeup call.
One of PACCA's biggest flaws is the computer system, which lacks integrity, says Winograd. "Right now, virtually any employee can go to any computer terminal and delete records."
That lends credibility to the suspicion that PACCA staffers have taken animals for either personal use or for sale to a pet shop.
"It's more than possible. It's easy. It's not that I saw it - I did not see it'" Winograd says. "There is very little stopping a dog or cat going out that door at 2 o'clock in the morning."

There's an "easy fix," starting with password protection "so that only key personnel" can get into the computer system. Other protections include making files impossible to delete and duplicating data to create an "audit trail," to avoid cases such as Dutchess, reported in the Daily News, where one PACCA worker told the owner the 4-month-old black poodle was in the shelter and another said it was never there at all.
Shelters where he previously worked - San Francisco and Tompkins County, N.Y. - set the "new standard" by moving to "no kill." PACCA needs to do the same.
Winograd asks, "Are they killing animals? Yes. Do they have to kill animals right now? Yes. Are they saving enough given all the constraints? No.
"They can save more."
E-mail Stu Bykofsky at stubyko@phillynews.com or call 215-854-5977. This column normally appears Tuesdays and Fridays. For recent columns, go to http://go.philly.com/byko.
Now, here we are four and a half years later and they finally got a grand jury to investigate the operation and staff in Riverside, CA. and recently came up with 28 felony charges on how they ran and misappropriated funds and lied to the county council. So, the public was outraged and spoke their minds for a couple weeks until the county announced plans for a bigger and newer facility to be built for $75 million within the next 5years. NO MENTION AT ALL OF ANY HUMANE EDUCATION to be implemented. When questioned about the humane education, the response was, that it costs too much. But it only took them 4 weeks to come up with $75 million to build a new dog pound.
Now I live in Northern Arizona and the animal control up in Las Vegas is asking for an additional $60 million in next contract negotiations per year. They have no humane education anywhere in the proposal at all. When questioned they replied on their hind legs 'We were at a school for the retarded for three whole days last year - don't tell us we have no humane education program!! I was afraid to ask about the other 238,000 students in the Vegas School System who did NOT have a visit from them last year.
The local animal control agency in Kingman is still running on a card system. No computers what so ever. I found someone to donate a decent computer and another to donate two years worth of dialup service - all the animal control had to do was to call and verify it was for them. Over the first year, I had to remind them to simply make that call therefore four times. Now, three years later, still nothing has been done. They all have Internet at home and are familiar with computers. Something is very fishy. Here is a model for establishing an effective community infrastructure that will safeguard animals and lower regional euthanasia rates. In this system it is vitally important that organizations have shared goals and understand that no one person or agency will end this problem on their own, it takes a community effort. Everyone's role must be defined and agencies must work within those roles for best results.
Generally speaking, nonprofit organization do what most nonprofit agencies do, extend the services that governments are unable to provide. They do not provide base animal control service in their area.

Breed Specific Laws
Simply Born From Ignorance and Lack of Responsibility of the pet's owners. Although this may or may not affect your household, the insurance companies are passing the buck as well. This affects EVERYONE!
In as much as each and every breed has their own specific traits, dogs are dogs when it comes to personality towards and around people. There is not a dog in the world that humans have been able to change the genetic makeup of the breed over a few decades due to ignorance or criminal behavior. It was simply the treatment that the particular dogs received that lead to their behavior, whether it was good or bad. Socialization is an enormous factor in this and a biting dog can most assuredly be traced back to something the human did wrong or something the human didn't do, but should have.
Dogs are, compared to other 'hazards' we accept without question in our society, fantastically safe. A very knowledgeable woman named Janis Bradley, has been researching this issue for an upcoming book on the subject and has compared dogs to everything from kitchen utensils and water buckets to strollers, Christmas trees, balloons and marbles. To these items they compare favorably. They compare even more favorably to things like swimming pools, bicycles and playground equipment.
What's amazing about dog bites is that we are grimly trying to count them: "There is no other such phenomenon that anyone even attempts to study when it doesn't produce physical harm." In other words, no one talks about the paper-cut epidemic, the chef's-knife-injury epidemic or the falling-in-bathtub epidemic. Why do dogs get to have "an epidemic" when five-gallon buckets, which are more dangerous, don't?
We are each "five times as likely to be killed by a bolt of lighting - not just struck by one, mind you - killed" than to be killed by a dog or dogs. Considering that less than 20 per cent of lightning strikes are fatal, this makes being struck by lightning 25 times more likely than being the victim of a fatal dog mauling. If the risk by exposure is then considered - there is one dog for every four or five people in the United States for instance, and most of these dogs encounter several people every day of their lives - dogs are almost incalculably safe.
And, contrary to the shrieking newspaper headlines, dog-related deaths are not trending upwards. The rate has remained astonishingly steady over all the decades that records have been kept.
With these points in the mix, it is clear that breed specific legislation is just an excuse for not obtaining the proper information and placing the blame on the wrong source. The blame will undoubtedly fall on that of the humans responsible for the particular dogs reaction to any and all situations. Basically, it is an irresponsible human who will allow this from their pets. It can be practically any breed known to man.
The source for the following is Dog Behavior Expert Dr. Richard Polsky Ph.D., CAAB Certified applied animal Behaviorist www.dogexpert.com
---Mixed breeds and not pure bred dogs are the type of dog most often involved in inflicting bites to people. The pure-bred dogs most often involved are German shepherds and Chow chows.
---Canines not spayed or neutered are three times more likely to bite than sterilized ones.
---Dogs forced to reside outside the home at night are 80% more likely to bite than ones who live inside with their human counterparts.
----The list of breeds most involved in both bite injuries and fatalities changes from year to year and from one area of the country to another, depending on the popularity of the breed.
---The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention document that a chained dog is 2.8 times more likely to bite than an unchained dog.
---Of the 27 people who died as a result of dog bite attacks in 1997 and 1998, 67% involved unrestrained dogs on the owner's property; 19% involved unrestrained dogs off the owner's property; 11% involved restrained dogs on the owner's property; and 4% involved a restrained dog off the owner's property.
---- Until 1992 Dalmatians were never in the top 25 of biting dogs. From 92 through 2000, they wavered from 2nd to 4th most likely. In 2001, the breed dropped from 4th to 18th. As of the end of 2003, they are again no longer in the top 25. Simply due to their overwhelming popularity and that few people understood their level of energy and requirements.
These facts and others are all supported by the Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyers Association as well as www.goodpooch.com which specializes in statistics for all forms of animal actions.
Routine discussions about dog bites frequently become derailed due to one persons' recollection of a particular event that seems to justify their every fear. IT DOES NOT. That is simply an anecdotal point that only carries weight with that person. In time, with more humane education, we can only hope that cooler heads and better decision making will prevail.
Many organizations both large and small won't make a move in any direction until and unless sanctioned by the HSUS, ignoring the fact that this organization is highly unlikely to dole out funds even if they were aware of your existence. The fear that the HSUS has placed into many groups around the nation through threats of lawsuits, etc. is quite daunting for those who simply don't know better. The following is a letter I wrote to the large national animal groups in 2003.
TO THE LARGE NATIONAL ANIMAL RIGHTS, ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL PROTECT ORGANIZATIONS
For 20 years that I've worked and lived, Americans have spent $1billion annually on animal control efforts in their communities. That is $20 Billion For 20 years, Americans have pleasured you with $1billion annually in charitable donations under the misguided assumptions that you are there to help the animals. That is another $20 Billion - Total of $40 billion! Over the same period of time more than 3,000 non profit organizations dedicated to their own idea of animal protection has logged nearly 25 Billion man hours - many struggling to survive when they are the ones who are putting in the time, money and efforts to actually save the animals that are considered 'excess' - something that after 20 years and $40 billion, we should no longer be burdened with had you done even half of what you suggest you do.
You offered little or no real substantial support to any of them from your air conditioned offices or your luxury homes. That is a D minus report card and if this is offensive to those who are employed by you or support you, I do not apologize. Regardless of your highly paid public relations department who will no doubt put a very different spin on this letter, the facts are in and they are not very complimentary to your efforts. You are large organizations. You are not THAT large.
You are no longer respectable or the nationally revered organization you once were. You are really no longer a big deal to those of us who see the light at the end of the tunnel - the light you shield from your supporters in order to continue receiving their financial donations even though you have no intention of ever solving any of these problems. Like our fanatical minority and religious leaders, our large animal protection organizations need their victims to survive. Absent crimes and imaginary situations against their people and teachings, these organizations disappear. This means jobs. As long as they can convince those who don't know better, they will survive.
Let me explain this to you: We are not afraid of any of your size and will no longer view you as the respectable ''God-Like" entities you would like us to. To give you that reference, to even call you respectable, gives you far too much stature. It is politics that prevents most of the good and compassionate efforts to help the animals, not be implemented, as well as envy, jealousy and all the human foibles that haunt us. Yet we think our mission noble and righteous. You know honor and good conscience would have handled many things differently, that would have helped us all to enjoy a happier, safer place for all to exist The animals who lost their lives over the past years only wish you had a little more honor and conscience. There is all too much talk here, with a tremendous lack of action. And I say that to everyone with the utmost respect. We are dealing with actual lives here - lives that are no less important than ours in the eyes of those up above. We are not your enemy or combatant, but the ones who will make the truth known in order to save our society the agony, the billions of dollars and the embarrassment of assuming these problems just can't be solved, when in reality, they can be. The citizens of this great nation have been lead down the wrong path by your rhetoric.
We will come and lay out evidence on which specific matters can be judged - to mold and shape and refine our sense of compassion and responsibility. We now know they can be. What was it that led me to this outburst? When confronting the larger organizations with questions, I have been lied to when looking for the delicate answers. When approaching the same with some very worthy ideas to bring more people to our level of understanding the importance of appropriate education to raise the level of compassion, I've been told that for political reasons, your organizations could not support our efforts. That for reasons of ego, could not be associated with 'that' organization. And for reasons of anger would not work with 'those people' and still claiming to be devoting your lives to the animals.
I have listened respectfully to what you have to say over the years. And I asked you to search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable morals have led you to do what you are guilty of doing. Promising to so many to help the animals by deceiving the public for so many years. We remained ignorant due to the spewing of your gruesome statistics and confusing programs and simply lead to believe that any solution was simply out of reach and that not much could be done, ''but that you were certainly the entity that would trust with this effort. "Do you really wish to be viewed with respect - even in heroic light? Then, I have an answer for you. It may not satisfy you. But as I search this entire record it comes as close to understanding as I know. It seems to me you fear the one thing that is most precious - TRUTH.
Be honest. Here, in this society, the very winds carry freedom based on truth from coast to coast. We can speak out and we aren't arrested for being stupid or wrong. It is because we prize individual freedom so much that you are allowed to do what you do. So, it is this I suggest in order to hold your heads up high and prove once and for all that the 'animal rights' fanatics have finally scored one for the sane. Alert the public that NEXT year you will be dissolving a major portion of your fictitious store front of an operation and will donate the necessary costs to fund spay/neuter programs nationwide for one year. NATIONWIDE. That includes Tuscaloosa, Fremont, Boise and even Mason City. So that everyone can see, truly see, that solutions to these problems are known, can be attained and are even more cost effective than the follow-up, clean - up rat race we burden ourselves with now - simply by default.
THEN your organization and efforts will be remembered, revered, respected and will even be able to continue your foundation, although at a lower level. But your 'come-back' or re-growth would be astronomical and historic in magnitude simply for doing something that the world could witness and to prove that you are not a false, hollow body of cold hearted money grabbers, but truly see that this is the right thing to do. The truth will surface with or without you and if that means that you must relinquish your exorbitant salaries, so be it. It will be your decision.
We are Americans. We are a noble society - proud of most everything we stand for and certainly about truth. We have been through the fire before with other elected politicians and large corporations who defrauded their clients and supporters as well. We've watched as politics have ruined the respectable and seen that hatred and egos have brought down the mighty. It will happen to you as well. As politics is a way of life in almost every other area of our society, it is also politics that is certain death to the animals you pledge your very existence to. Americans put a man on the moon, can cure diseases, win wars in under 100 days and have the marketing prowess to change mankind's behavior on a global scale, but are told that we cannot convey the important message to the public of the subsequent consequences that result from how we treat and care for our companion animals - the very information that would grant us the solitude of compassion and honor.
Though we've been mislead, misguided and shaded from any truths in these matters by the large animal organizations for all these years we still need your involvement in this battle. We need everyone to possess the knowledge and put forth a unified effort. We are becoming more uneasy, less respectful and feel betrayed by your warring factors as well as the greed to keep yourselves funded as opposed to actually solving these problems. Because we all know that the way we treat our animals - those we share this blessed earth with, is a true reflection of the level of civilization we boast of, we will not give up, but push harder for the answers and efforts necessary to weed out the unnecessary and revere that what is dear to us, as it is the measure of our own liberties as well as pride.
Make no mistake though: It is true that we will bear any burden, pay any price, to see that these problems can find resolve and without the political wrangling that the larger animal protection organizations seem to embroil themselves in. So, if you should decide to scoff at this letter in the uncanny assumption that it means nothing, then I suggest you look around this nation. Remember it well. For in the near future, the animal protection movement will finally take the effort to see that changes be made. For if you are not a part of that, you will most assuredly not be a part of any high, medium or low level efforts to help the animals. The world is not going to long remember what you or I say here. Day after tomorrow it will be forgotten. But this, however, will long endure. We know now that the solution to pet overpopulation and even most animal abuse is more easily within reach, less expensive than holding onto you and will give us the pride we deserve once it is solved without your involvement. Here, and all across America, the American people will gather to see that justice, justice for all - including the animals - justice is in fact being done. With or without you.

I'm one, who's primary goal in life is to see humane education programs in each and every classroom in the nation through dedicated volunteer efforts. It is proven that consequence is not nearly as effective as conscience. With the appropriate instruction and guidance to young people, this type program provides young people as well as troubled and at risk teens, the moral structure necessary to give them higher academic achievement scores, improved attendance rates and they also tend to adopt a less violent conflict resolution technique.
I have traveled with my 7 dogs from Washington state down to New Mexico through the 8 western states reaching over 5,000 students. I (we) plan to continue this through an additional 30 states to make our goal of speaking to one million youth on topics surrounding humane education, community service programs and the importance of voting. See the end of this section. My 501c3 organization proudly boasts the largest and most comprehensive website available for humane education materials (over 900 pages). We have been graced with TONS of media coverage in People Magazine, LA Times, NY Post, Letterman show, Rosie, Arsenio Hall, Leeza Gibbons and much more. We also have 9 books on the topic available at the following page on our site: http://www.21stcenturycares.org/products.htm along with some t -shirts, hats and sweatshirts with cool humane education logos on them.
In my opinion, the failure of society to fully value and protect our companion animals is its most extreme example of utter and abject failure. Kids today literally jump at the chance to try and solve a problem such as this - a problem that their parents and others just couldn't seem to 'deal with'! A solid humane education program helps kids to use their "CREATIVITY, IMAGINATION, COMPASSION and INTELLECT. There are ideals which have to be broken through and overcome before we can address them; primarily the "attitudes toward animals. Students can speak OUT on behalf of all the innocent lives lost across this country each year and they actually rise to occasion when given the challenge of correcting the tragic situation their parents and others have gotten our society into. Education Why it is necessary and the benefits to healthier humans, as well as animals, saving on vet bills, fines and taxes while eliminating the need for killing due to sheer ignorance by the public.
"Why is humane education needed? We never needed it before…."In nearly 20 years of listening to thousands of adults explain why they ‘had to’ dump their pets, it became so clear that most of them honestly didn’t have a clue as to how easy it would have been for them to have done the right thing in the first place. Instead, they end up assuming there are no options. They feel this is an acceptable solution. But most horrifying is the fact they rarely feel true remorse. Many still think dog pounds will find their pets a new home. Many feel finding a good home for their pets is merely finding someone with a backyard and a smile promising to love it, with no background check or agreement at all. In as much as I’ve grown weary and disheartened with today’s adults.
The basis of the relationship between people and pets is attachment. Attachment is a firmly accepted component of human evolutionary behavior. Attachment is the behavior of the young. Its complimentary behavior in the adult is care-giving or nurturing. Psychiatrists in the 1970s began studying the nature of the attachment between people and pets. They were quoted as saying: "Pets are less threatening and more controllable than human attachment figures. At the same time, the combined qualities of warmth, touch, non-threatening movement and sound produce a simple analogue of human attachment behavior.
Animals bolster the pet owner's morale and remind him that he is, in fact, a special and unique individual. "So we must accept that the basis of pet ownership is not a quirky eccentricity but has a sound behavioral explanation. This information has been used extensively in a variety of pets-as-therapy programs around the world. Whether dealing with socially inept children, emotionally disturbed adolescents, adults recovering from severe illness or the elderly and alone, companion animals have played a significant role in reducing stress and increasing the feeling of self-worth.
In our everyday "normal" lives pets play an important role also. Despite the trend towards urban consolidation, more and more people tend to lead isolated lives. The number of single person households is increasing rapidly, as is the number of crimes against women and the elderly. The role of pets becomes increasing important in these situations. Herein lies the dilemma. While there is probably a greater need for pet companionship than ever before, the changing urban landscape is creating an environment that makes pet ownership more difficult.
Urban consolidation decreased size of private open space (backyards) and increasing competition for public open space (parks) places enormous pressures on dog owners in particular. Similarly for the non-pet owner, closer proximity and increased contact with other peoples' pets seems inevitable. Urban planning, education programs for pet owners and non-pet owners alike, and the development of realistic and enforceable animal control laws are the key to maintaining the balance between the needs of the majority of our community i.e. the pet owners, and the welfare and rights of others. The benefits derived from pet ownership have been researched extensively. There is no doubt that a close relationship with companion animals is of benefit to the emotional and psychological development of children, provides much needed companionship and support to the elderly, assists in the recovery rate of patients suffering from serious illness and decreases the rate of minor illness, and may substantially reduce the risk of heart disease.
Pets-as-therapy programs around the world have highlighted the benefits of assistance dogs, horse riding for sufferers of cerebral palsy and other disabilities, and the use of companion animals with mentally disturbed children and adolescents. With such strong support for the benefits of pets it could be suggested that pet ownership should in fact be actively encouraged by governments and health authorities, and it is not inconceivable that pets may be prescribed for the sick or disturbed in the future. Evaluation of Solutions
Education: Children must obtain a basic grounding in the care and management of companion animals. They must be taught to respect all animals and to realize they have a responsibility to care for pets. In schools this can be effectively achieved through the Pet Pep program which should be in every primary school by the end of 2013. Younger children however must also be targeted from as early as possible through their parents and preschool classes. Adults - pet owners. The expectations of pet ownership and the associated responsibilities have changed rapidly. In the past two decades it has become unacceptable to allow a dog to roam the streets or defecate in public areas. Pet owners often ignore these attitudinal changes in the community. Educational material aimed at pet owners must aim at raising the awareness of these changes and assist them in being able to meet the more demanding expectations of a far more vocal non-pet owning group. This education process can occur through: I. media- advertising- human interest/current affair programs- regular stories in print. II. seminars Highly successful community seminars can be held at local venues with speakers like the local vets and the animal control officer (ACO). Incentive to attend such seminars can be generated by pre-publicity, free gift or bonus eg decreased dog registration fee for attendance. III. information booths. This popular concept can access the general public in shopping centers, local festivals and other community activities. The booths must be approachable and staffed by trained personnel who can answer queries. IV. Videos: There are a number of pet education videos available for all age groups. Local libraries could stock these as could veterinary surgeries and council offices.
The community: The status of pets in the community must be promoted. It should be unacceptable to denigrate the importance of the people/pet relationship or stipulate areas that are exempt to pet owners. The education of the community to accept pet ownership as an integral and important right of its members must be achieved in conjunction with raising the consciousness and concern of pet owners for others.
Recommendations: Companion animals must not be regarded as a luxury, but as an integral part of every household. The benefits and advantages of pet ownership to the community overall, as well as to individuals, are enormous. Because companion animals are so important we must be supportive of responsible pet ownership and innovative in the ways we approach the problems encountered in urban animal management. I stand firm in my belief that if they had knowledge of the resulting consequences of their actions, or been informed of just how simple and easy it is to do the right thing in the first place, almost all of them would have done the right thing. These ‘options’ not only save money, but they save lives. Ignorance and apathy, (the lack of understanding the entire picture) are undoubtedly the biggest part of the problems nowadays and are overwhelming in today’s adults. The good news is, both are easily correctable I have used my experiences of rescuing abandoned and abused dogs for the past 18 years to show students 'cause and affect' and to teach them compassionate means of avoiding the unnecessary continuation of these deadly acts.
Since my mission is to do whatever possible to see some form of humane education program in our nation's schools, it is difficult to walk away from a meeting with me without feeling my undying passion to spread this universal message to the next generation. It is hoped that they will benefit from the love and compassion that all animals can offer us and stop the abuse and overpopulation. The more people we can involve in and educate on these matters, the more that they will all understand the seriousness and magnitude of the atrocities being committed every day in this country and around the world. It can only be a good thing.
It is proven that it does NOT take money to solve these problems! It takes the sharing of information and community involvement. Adult Americans are currently responsible for the sad legacy we leave to the younger generation in regards to the animals - their abuse, overpopulation and subsequent convenient and unnecessary euthanasia. So, it is only logical that if the general public is causing these problems, then we can't depend on THEM to teach their children how to correct the situation. They obviously don't know. Nobody has a litter of puppies or kittens just so they can be abused or later put to sleep. Most of those directly involved simply do the things they do out of ignorance, over inflated ego and apathy. We adults simply never had an opportunity to be involved in a comprehensive or successful humane education program. We simply learned a lot of the things we did through talking to our family at the dinner table, etc. Now that our families are more pseudo-assembled than ever, the topic of how best to care for Spot and Muffy, is simply lost in the shuffle. These things simply need some explaining in order to correct them. What used to be very simple, still is. We just need to begin where we obviously left off - with the kids.
I've been given thousands of reasons why the 'owners' had to get rid of their beloved pets. "They no longer match the interior of my living room," or she gained too much weight and we don't want a fat dog, or it's not housebroken, it barks. All are the fault of the caregiver / guardian, or in this case the pet's 'owner'. In almost all cases, had the person or family adopting the pet had checked out the given breed's qualities or taken some time in properly caring for the pet, it would have become a wonderful addition to the family and it's lifestyle. We provide information obtained from various national animal welfare groups and show proven means of avoiding he re-occurrences of these mistakes. They all provide good solid research with variety of solutions to all the big problems.
We will discuss various ways in which they can become more active in their community by gaining knowledge and acting according to what is the best for all souls who surround them. This program, and many others like it, could easily change the way most people today think about their pets as well as how they are cared for. Many people simply begin by adopting the wrong type pet for the family and lifestyle they have. People will spend more time researching a new automobile than looking into the type of living soul they wish to spend the next 15 years with. A large number of those will just as easily take a puppy over an adult dog because 'they want to train it to be like they want it to be" only to give up on it and take it to the pound. Ignorantly, a lot of people seem to think that their pet will certainly find a good home. The reality is obviously quite different. Then there is the thought that only 'bad' dogs and cats are found at the pound; therefore they would rather not go there. In reality, the majority of the animals who are awaiting adoption at the local dog pound are only there due to an ignorant and impatient 'owner'. So, ignorance of the adults, in general will also be the main cause of these animals never having a fair shot at a second chance for life.
The most important focus of this program is to teach the younger generation that if they have a litter of puppies or kitties, then they immediately become the biggest problem we have in solving the situation of overpopulation. "But, I found good homes for my litter" is only an excuse for ignorance. If you are part of a company who makes widgets and you have an overstock of more than 8 million widgets that can't be sold and must be destroyed, the ONLY solution to preventing additional and costly losses is to stop manufacturing widgets. When asked why so many normal, well-educated and loving families had a litter of puppies or kittens, two responses kept coming up. "Oh, we PLAN to have our pets spayed or neutered, but we wanted to have a couple litters first." In other words, they just missed the whole point of the spay and neuter campaign. The second one is "we just wanted to show the children the miracle of birth" Then the only fair thing to do in this situation is to take them to the local dog pound to volunteer for a couple days as well. After all, you've just become one of the biggest contributing factors to the problems we see at our animal facilities!! Overcrowding.
BACKYARD BREEDERS are not educated, they are not providing quality dogs and cats and they DON'T have you or your new pet's best interest at hand. One thing that is very upsetting is when the school administrators feel this is NOT a necessary or appropriate educational program for their students. It is very disheartening to hear a superintendent or principal downplay these programs that affect each and every student and faculty member in their reach. Excuses like "All of our students already have dogs or cats" to "we don't feel that we need an outsider into our schools to tell us we need to learn about how to be responsible for our pets and their needs'. We are aware that most of their students have or will have pets of their own. We just don't particularly wish for them to simply follow in the footsteps of those adults or caregivers they learn live with. After all, it's today's adults - all of us, to a certain extent - who are creating this problem.
The education program is our main goal in trying to prevent the unnecessary killing of innocent, adoptable pets due to ignorance and irresponsibility by humans. What follows is an outline or an abbreviated version of the program that usually lasts about 45 minutes or more, depending on questions coming from the students and adults in attendance The discussion involving the possible formation of their local humane education club or helping them to launch a project to help their community would be following this short program and could last an hour or more. This could take place at another time and place with an adult advisor, so as not to prevent the students from missing additional class time.
TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION WITH THE STUDENTS:
1. The benefits of community involvement. Do not stand idly by and allow abuse, neglect or other ignorance by humans. Help the community to learn to better through information sharing.
2. The need for everyone with a pet to have some form of access to proper training and guidance.
3. The importance of becoming the 'guardian' of the proper pet for you and your family and the lifestyle you live.
4. The absolute evils of having a litter of puppies or kittens along with the importance of timely spaying and neutering of said pet.
5. The importance of providing the appropriate needs for your pet, not necessarily what your ego decides is best for them.
6. How everyone can become involved on an individual basis by helping senior citizens and low income families by providing occasional vet trips or a few bags of dog food to prevent their pets from being relinquished to the animal facility unnecessarily.
7. The benefits of beginning with an adult dog from the dog pound as opposed to 'assuming' that they have the knowledge or understanding of how to properly train a new young puppy to meet their needs. (Having my five dogs in the classroom that are obviously very lovable and worthwhile, helps bring this point home with some foundation) Each one was an adult from the pound when I adopted him or her. The fact that one has kept a puppy, only means they were lucky, not necessarily a skilled or knowledgeable trainer. An adult dog from the pound is already spayed and neutered, vaccinated; past it's digging and chewing stage and will respond with love and affection as it has just come from a family who obviously didn't care.
8. The proven benefits for humans as well as their pets of providing 'indoor' sleeping arrangements for their pets. Reduced allergies for children, improved allergenic reactions for adults who already have them, as well as a longer and healthier life for the pets as well. After all, if a dog is to protect its most important family members, it can't do so from the back yard if it has no access to the inside areas. (Reference: Associated Press article by Justin Pritchard in San Francisco)
9. A 'guard dog' is one who has been properly trained for the job and understands its boundaries. It is NOT a dog someone throws into the back yard with no guidance or training. The latter will only prove to annoy your neighbors and cause your family undue troubles with barking, biting or destruction of property.
10. Why the perfect family should consider a second compatible dog or cat as a companion for the first one. (Too many deserving and loving animals will die if not, and dogs and cats are social animals and enjoy the company of other compatible dogs and cats) They play with and train each other and offer much needed exercise for each other.
11. The absolute necessity for having proper identification on your pet at ALL TIMES. (I.e. 4th of July, New Years Eve, tornadoes, earthquakes and various events that frighten your pet to where they will escape out of fear.)
12. To discuss the proven links between animal abuse and future criminal activity as adults. (Reference Houston Chronicle Story Nov 29, 2000 by Jo Ann Zuiga: "Animal Abuse May Be Warning Sign)
13. IF you are forced to part with your beloved pet, remember to never take it to the local pound, but to a local rescue org. and NEVER place a "FREE TO GOOD HOME" ad in the paper. The 'whys' and the options. Rethink your decision to relinquish the pet. It has already given everything it has to try and please you and would certainly give it's life to protect you if need be. Don't dump it off for silly self-centered reasons, which could be rectified through some training tips or a few sacrifices on your part.
SUGGESTED PROJECTS FOR THOSE INTERESTED
1. To hopefully prepare a program in which the members will visit other schools in and around the local area to share this information and hopefully help others to form these humane education clubs in their schools as well.
2. The first several meetings of this group can be enhanced through additional speakers from their local humane organizations, vets, dog trainers and animal control officers who will share their local problems with the students.
3. Offers to assist senior citizens and low income families with donated food and vet visits as well as training tips to improve the quality of the pets' lives as well as their own.
4. How to convince the public to obtain appropriate identification for all pets either through a simple engraved tag on the collar or micro-chipping.
5. To tackle the project of holding an OFF SITE adoption program for those pets who would otherwise face certain death at the local facility. After all, the public rarely goes to the pound, as it is a very sad and depressing place. They will, however attend an event at a local city park where each animal is leashed and accompanied by a volunteer with a card containing the autobiography of that given pet.
6. Try to tackle a project such as opening a local dog park where the dogs and their guardians come to socialize, run and play with each other in a securely fenced area.
7. Obtaining much needed coverage in their school newspaper to help other students to learn proper care-giving procedures and responsibilities for their pets. Not to mention the benefits to their org. as well as the local community of having nice coverage within their local papers and t. v. news.
8. Letter writing campaigns, neighborhood 'reach' programs and other means of truly helping the local population as well as local government officials to provide improved care for their pets.
9. The need to speak out and get involved in issues that surround your family and those you care about. To take action and vote on issues and for candidates who strongly support and stand by ideals that help your local area to grow and improve the quality of life for all souls who reside there. Do not sit idly by while a neighbor neglects or abuses an animal by tying it up to a post or allowing it to go without food or water. Do not sit idly by while an important initiative gets defeated in your local elections.
IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW, THINKS THEY WOULD LIKE TO GO TO SCHOOLS AND VOLUNTEER SOME TIME AND INFORMATION IN AN ATTEMPT TO HELP THE NEXT GENERATION BECOME MORE INFORMED AND COMPASSIONATE, PLEASE EMAIL OR CALL 21ST CENTURY CARES. YOU WILL BE PROVIDED WITH INFORMATION ON HOW TO APPROACH THE SCHOOLS, MATERIALS FOR VARIOUS GRADE LEVELS, PROJECT IDEAS AND MORE.
A simple, yet unified message to the public is the missing ingredient. Many people still are unaware of the concept surrounding humane education and have little understanding of the benefits it would bring with it. Two years ago, I had an idea, with the participants of the coalition I had recently formed, to make an attempt at introducing the concept of humane education in the schools by asking every animal protection organization to write a simple letter. Herein is the information that caused such an uproar:
Dear Animal Rights, Animal Protection and Animal Welfare organizations, Teachers and Parents, 1-America CARES will do the actual mailing 2-Your organization only need to send a letter via email to be included 3-Read the cover letter below and see a sample letter of what we hope yours will say. "Recognizing that each individual organization would ultimately hope for the implementation of humane education programs in our nation's schools as well as the elimination of all political aspects that have prevented our efforts from moving further towards our goals, the America CARES Coalition has taken on the following project. Realizing that each organization has their own goals and objectives that should be pursued in the way they see fit, this letter is only to show the 50 states' governors, legislators and board of educations, that we (all animal welfare, animal rights and animal protection organizations regardless of size) can stand together on one issue in agreement. The signatures will be listed by organizational name in an alpha numerical order so as not to give any single participant extra 'weight' or notoriety among the remaining signatures. We also realize that there is so much more that needs to be said, done and done in a variety of ways, but this letter is specifically written in very simple terms to eliminate the political wrangling as well as to show them, and well as ourselves, that it is possible for everyone to agree on something in a very public display of unity towards our nation's schools and the implementation of humane education into the curriculum by the year 2010. By sending a simple letter with a definitive statement, this will show the vast number of voters and citizens that truly have an interest in seeing humane education included into our nation's schools. It is a letter to affect change. Each organization should continue to pursue their noble efforts in the way they have successfully established prior to this. How each state implements this is the individual states' decision. This will provide all organizations an opportunity to pursue the states with their ideas of how it could be included and under given guidelines guidelines. If you or your organization would like to participate in this mass effort, all we need is a simple letter. Your organization can go into details at any level. You can promote your individual organizations' efforts. You can say most anything along the lines of supporting humane education. Sample Of Letter For Your Organization To Send: To All States Legislative Bodies, Governors and Boards of Education Seeds for Change Humane Education agrees with the cover letter and have given permission to include our name in support of humane education in our nation's schools.
Example: Our organization, Seeds for Change Humane Education looks at the connection between violence and oppression, and seeks to undermine systems of exploitation and cruelty by teaching positive, life-affirming, sustainable, and humane lifestyle choices that help people, animals, and the Earth. We offer a free series of educational presentations on animal and environmental issues for grades 6-12th, college students and adult audiences in San Diego County, California. Our dynamic, thought-provoking presentations encourage student participation and critical thinking by combining lively discussions with short videos, visual aids, and activities. SINCERELY, Dani Dennenberg, Director and FounderSeeds for Change Humane Educationwww.seedsforchangehumaneeducation.org.
In the first paragraph hopefully you will confirm your agreement to the simply written letter. Limiting the letter to only one page, we would expect you to use the remainder of the page to promote your efforts and your thoughts on humane education. Send it via email to NATIONWIDE LETTER FOR HUMANE EDUCATION 21stcares@citlink.net.
THE ACTUAL LETTER THAT AMERICA CARES WILL SEND WILL READ: WE THE UNDERSIGNED SEE THE IMPORTANCE OF A HUMANE EDUCATION PROGRAM TO BE IMPLEMENTED INTO OUR OUR NATION'S SCHOOLS. WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL ALSO REVIEW THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON ANY OF THE FOLLOWING WEBSITES FROM THOSE ORGANIZATIONS THAT SUPPORT THIS MOVEMENT. WE FEEL THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED BY 2010 AND MANY OF THE LISTED ORGS WILL BE CONTACTING YOU IN THE FUTURE. SINCERELY, THE UNDERSIGNED (alpha-numerical listing) ATTACHMENTS: (Copy of each organizations letter of support)
The actual letter America CARES sends will NOT be on anyone's letter head, each org will be listed in alphabetical - numerical order. This would be the first time anything has been done with all the major national organizations as well as any and all others willing to sign on, would make a huge impact on the recipients as well as make history. Nothing political. Nothing showing power of one over the other but clearly outlining that everyone is still an individual org, etc. but have all come together for the sake of this letter and it's contents that can change the world in which we live This will also open up opportunities for all who participate to approach the various states' elected officials and school boards with their idea of programs and suggestions, not to mention the coverage from the mainstream media. With over 3,000 non profit organizations focusing efforts on animal protection, we would need a minimum of 1600 letters just to make a difference. Currently we have over 300. We welcome any and all organizations. We NEED all the larger nationally recognized organizations. If you are actively involved with any of the larger nationally recognized organizations, please lend your support for this effort. We need only have the signature of the director of humane education. Feel free to pass this letter on to any and all other animal rights, animal welfare and animal protection organizations. We would like to have the mailings prepared and ready to mail by April 30, 2004. Sincerely, Randy N. WarnerPresident21st Century C.A.R.E.S. Director of America CARES Coalition to make changes.
I was more than a little amazed when the representative of Tony LaRussa's Animal Rescue Foundation, along with the Director of the ASPCA in New York, as well as Grey2k all declined to participate unless the original letter stated 'their beliefs' a little more clearly - then, insisted that the letter be re worded. I assured them that the remaining portion of the letter could say anything that they pleased and that would fit the wording of their organization, but that the simplicity of the letter was the key to seeing that everyone would be saying the same thing while having the opportunity to work together and still confirm the beliefs of their individual messages.
My ultimate goal was to get a majority of all animal protection organizations to work together on this project that I still firmly believe they all support in basic theory, but their egos and agendas won out and none of the ones mentioned ended up participating. Each one became angrier and angrier until they, along with several thousand other groups decided against it all together.
The humane education director at Best Friends was so threatened by the fact that the idea was not going to be attributed to her organization, she began a smear campaign to many other smaller groups which look to them for guidance. The end result was still impressive, as we were able to continue with the project and included 874 non profit organizations from all 50 states who simply mailed us their simple letter supporting humane education in the nation's schools. Not unlike the one shown above in the letter introducing the project initially. That was a sad end result to such a minor and simple effort which could have truly made a statement had each and every one of them taken two minutes and joined in with the unified message. Now, here we are all the way to the year 2005. This is now how I spend my time. Working for no pay, but feeling like I'm literally changing the whole world for the better. It's an incredible feeling, I'll tell you.
70 children in a middle school auditorium in Sante Fe, New Mexico or possibly Monterey, California, erupt in happy squeals as I lead five dogs into the classroom. All jerking tails and wiggling bodies, these furry educational aids – or aides, if you will – are just as thrilled to see the students, as the students are to see them. Amid the excited chatter, I hold up my hand for silence. If you’ll give me 15 minutes to talk,” I tell the rapt audience, “I’ll give you five minutes to pet the dogs.” The children quickly grow still. I immediately launch into my favorite subject – homeless pets and how to help prevent them. However, as the minutes tick by, these students begin to squirm, reach out to pet one of the dogs and whisper. Finally, sensing they can’t stand another minute away from his furry troupe, I cave in and invite the children forward. In a split second, they besiege the dogs in a flutter of petting, scratching hands. The canines thump their legs in ecstasy. ( 2 deaf Dalmatians, one pit bull, one coyote/dingo and a beagle/basset mix) I must admit, it always ends up going in reverse – I talk for five minutes, and the kids get 15 minutes with the dogs, but it’s worth it.
At the end of the 45 minutes, everyone can see the eyes lighting up with questions, ideas, thoughts of 'why'. They really 'get it'. I have but one goal for the rest of my life. That is to change the status quo by helping to raise a kinder, gentler next generation. I plan to continue my travels through 40 states - over 12,000 miles - with my five dogs as navigators in the next two years, charging NO fees to groups I address. I let it all out. I don't cover up the truth with sweet words or phrases that make a horrific situation sound more gentle and less important. It’s not a shelter, but a dog pound. We don’t ‘euithanise’ and ‘put to sleep’ we kill these animals - needlessly. The six of is will appear before more than 1 million youth in schools across the United States, urging students everywhere to form Humane Education Clubs in their schools. In my opinion, the failure of society to fully value and protect our companion animals is its most extreme example of utter and abject failure.
Kids today literally jump at the chance to try and solve a problem such as this - a problem that their parents and others just couldn't seem to 'deal with'! Humane Education clubs are already forming at schools nationwide. The 8 western states that we have visited with this program are already experiencing a profound impact on the lives of the animals. These students involve and immerse themselves in finding new creative ways to become the new frontier of the animal welfare movement. Studies show that by offering humane education to our youth, they develop a more sophisticated and solid moral structure and they will come to enjoy education more, resulting in higher attendance, more participation in the field of science, lower drop-out rates, improved achievement scores and the adoption of a less violent conflict resolution technique. As the founder and president of 21st Century Animal Resource & Education Services, Inc. as well as an outspoken advocate of education and enlightenment on animal protection issues, I firmly believe we have failed as a society when it comes to how we view our companion animals. We still have those self-serving, uninformed folks who have litters of puppies and kittens, convincing themselves that they aren't part of the problem, It's always those who refuse to play by the rules, that assures that their team will loose the game. But in this game, the animals die from these stubborn humans. This program helps kids to use their "CREATIVITY, IMAGINATION, COMPASSION and INTELLECT.
There are ideals which have to be broken through and overcome before we can address them; primarily the "attitudes toward animals. Students can speak OUT on behalf of all the innocent lives lost across this country each year and they actually rise to occasion when given the challenge of correcting the tragic situation their parents and others have gotten our society into.
We Americans pay billions of dollars in taxes to reduce the volume of unwanted animals, then turn around and donate another Billion dollars for animal welfare and animal rights and to local and area rescuers. But, shelters and pounds are still overwhelmed by the thousands of lonely, homeless pets who come in every day because of a simple problem: there are many more folks who wish to have litters and that is what this is all about. It's important that we share the valid and proven ways to solve these problems with those who will govern our nation in the future. We are responsible for their learning and have an obligation to show them it's our problem - its' up to all of us to make the correct decisions.


Why Should the Animal Protection Movement Organize?
This is an amazingly informative article that should be required reading for anyone in the animal protection movement. The sister article that is also extremely informative is found by clicking HERE! and also one that is quite powerful by clicking HERE!

Making social change requires a political animal
by Julie Lewin
From 'ANIMAL PEOPLE NEWS'' July 2004

Bill Moyer has spent more than 40 years as a full-time theorist, organizer, consultant and educator about social movements. Since 1973 the Midwest Academy has trained more than 20,000 activists, in a broad range of causes. Earlier editions of the Midwest Academy Manual have been required reading for many degree programs around the country. There is a lesson here: for decades other causes have concentrated heavy resources on organizing politically and developing political skills. Animal advocates have not yet made a comparable investment.
Moyer and the Midwest Academy have much to teach us that with few exceptions we have not learned from within our own movement. Most important is a way of thinking. Effective activism is only coincidentally self-expression, if at all. Effective activism requires the ability and willingness to accurately perceive the nuances of public perception and behavior. It requires strategic thinking. It requires evaluating goals and strategies utterly objectively, to discern where the balance of economic power lies, the political dynamics surrounding the goal, the resources available to activists to achieve the goal, and the most advantageous public image that activists can use.
Also essential is recognizing how these dynamics evolve over time, necessitating strategic shifts. Political thinking does not come naturally to most people, but is not difficult to learn. Once you get it, it is like e-mail: you realize you barely functioned without it. Responding to "the absence of a practical model that describes and explains the normal path of successful social movements," Moyer offers a highly detailed Movement Action Plan (MAP) which describes the trajectory of any cause and most effective use of any public opinion-shaping method. MAP identifies four roles of activism: citizen, rebel, change agent, and reformer.
He explains how each role can be filled effectively--and how they are often filled ineffectively. Moyer also diagrams "Eight Stages of the Process of Social Movement Success," which progress from "normal times" with a festering grievance, requiring advocates of change to "prove the failure of official institutions"; advance to "ripening conditions" and "take off"; either falter or regroup with "perception of failure"; and eventually achieve "majority public opinion," leading to "success" and "continuing the struggle." All readers will have their favorite observations or epiphanies.
Among mine is Moyer's analysis under "Stage 5, Perception of Failure." Moyer cautions activists against naively expecting the world to rapidly make a 180-degree turn on their issue, becoming wrongly disillusioned, and giving up prematurely, without having built the enduring foundation that is the only hope for real change. Incorrect appraisal of the situation produces naive disillusionment. Further, it leads to the "emergence of the negative rebel," who makes a "bad revolutionary."
The profile of the bad revolutionary is described in marvelous, instructive and almost humorous detail. Organizing for Social Change concentrates more on how to develop a strategy and see it through. The "Midwest Academy Strategy Chart," attributed to Heather Booth, consists of Goals; Organizational Considerations; Constituents, Allies, and Opponents; Targets; and Tactics. It is a fabulous accompaniment to Moyer's MAP. The manual is divided into "direct action organizing," "organizing skills," "support for organization" and "selected resources," which cover 26 major topic areas. Let the book fall open anywhere and I'll bet you'll learn something useful.

Protests:
Without the skills enhanced or provided by these books, untold activist hours are squandered, and many are spent counterproductively. One example of counterproductive behavior is heavy reliance on protests, which is a sign of a movement which has not matured past infancy. Protests do not build a grassroots machine capable of wielding political power, and they mis-educate new activists about the dynamics of change. The time needed to plan and attend a protest usually could be better spent in a variety of ways. Examples include recruiting door-to-door, attending a city council meeting, writing letters to the editors of local newspapers, and-above all-building an enduring, expanding grassroots organization capable of punishing and rewarding public officials at the polls.
Even peaceful protests encourage the target public to view advocates as marginal people with whom they share few values. Further, protests subliminally encourage advocates to view themselves as outsiders. If there is one lesson I have learned as an animal activist and lobbyist for 16 years, it is that we need to try to position ourselves inside, not outside general society and social institutions. I am not suggesting weakening our goals. However, a rule of thumb applicable to revolutionaries in any cause is that the more controversial or radical your goals, the more conservative your image needs to be.

Let's get political:
Another example of counter-productivity: Across the country legions of animal rescuers (including me) devote vast time and money to rescuing cats and dogs. Yet how many have made it their business to forge relationships with the members of their town council? How many have identified their supporters by voting district? How many report to their supporters at least annually what their local government is doing to help or hinder, and tell their supporters how each elected official voted on animal-related issues, including budget items? Is the local government building and adequately funding shelters and sterilization programs? Is it passing and enforcing appropriate legislation?
Is it even aware of the homeless animal issue? Most important, are voters who care about animals aware of the councellers' state of awareness? Animal rescue groups call me often to seek advice about resolving dreadful situations regarding dog pounds, feral cat colonies, and other emergencies. Politically speaking, they nearly always are starting from scratch. Although the callers have often been in and out of the local pound for years, they are virtually always unaware of the many official documents available to them through Freedom of Information Acts to maintain accountability or help build their case. Nor are they familiar enough with town government to know that in nearly all jurisdictions, members of the public can address town officials by requesting to be put on the agendas of public meetings.
Learning to think politically includes programming yourself to conceptualize the workings of government (including your dog pound), and to assume the existence of documents awaiting your discovery. Function politically, and you will prevent many bad situations from occurring in the first place. You will also be able to reverse others more quickly. Creating a political culture A third example of counterproductive behavior is animal advocates' extreme resistance to being political-I use this term broadly-although many institutionalized cruel behaviors to animals can be stopped only by being political.
As a case in point, in Connecticut fewer than two percent of the adult population are licensed hunters, and only a tiny fraction of one percent are licensed trappers, yet our state wildlife agency consists of hunters and trappers who energetically promote both pursuits. Public education campaigns and protests have not and will not stop this. The solution is to create a grassroots political machine of animal advocates capable of rewarding or punishing legislators at the polls.
This is what the hunters have done and why they drive wildlife policy. Legislators fear that the politically organized hunting lobby-as small as it is-is large enough to vote them out of office by providing the winning margin to their opponent. Remember my favorite political axiom: A well-organized minority can drive public policy on an issue, because every politician knows that such a minority can swing elections. These examples bring me to the weakness of both these books. Their starting point is the use of the dynamics of participatory democracy to gain change.
To gain change in the public policy arena, advocates of a cause must wield the power of the vote to reward or punish politicians on Election Day. Doing Democracy is strangely apolitical. Moyer provides no information about the structure or dynamics of politics. Yet I enormously admire and applaud Moyer's skill in diagramming power in society. Animal advocates cannot approach their potential to help animals without understanding how power is allocated among social institutions.
Developing a culture of professional, political activism is impossible without such perspective. Organizing for Social Change does incorporate political organization and the dynamics of elections, but wrongly generalizes by attributing success on issues to winning majority opinion. Animal advocates have long since won majority opinion on some issues, but have not succeeded in translating majority support into reductions of institutionalized animal abuse because opponents are much better positioned politically.

Sign up now:
Formed to address the lack of a focused political culture in animal activism is the new National Institute for Animal Advocacy. The Institute will offer intensive three, four and five-day courses in political activism with the intentions of:
1) Raising the level of national discourse among advocates;
2) creating a political culture within animal advocacy; and 3) turning out professional, effective advocates, who are equipped to function politically with the expertise that other grassroots issue groups have had for decades. The curriculum will include: Theories of Social Change, The Structure of Government and the Structure of Politics; Creating Your Grassroots Political Machine for Animals: Municipal, County and State; Political Dynamics, the Legislative Process and the Political Mind; Creating a Lobbying Presence; the Mechanics and Dynamics of Political Campaigns (necessary to understand the political mind); Recruitment Strategies; Exploiting Media and Creating an Image; Fundraising Strategies; and Legal Issues pertinent to these activities.
The faculty will consist of seasoned political activists from other issue groups, legislators, and other political figures. The program will be rigorous enough to qualify for academic credit if arrangements are made in advance. The first Institute session will be held October 18-21 in Southeastern Connecticut at a beautiful ocean-front retreat and conference center. We will provide train station and airport pick-ups and drop-offs. Alternatively, we can bring a future session of the Institute to you. For details, please contact me as soon as possible at <jlewin@igc.org> or 203-453-6590.
We are so far behind other countries in this battle. In order to become a the "no-kill’ society that many other industrialized nations of the world are presently finding success with, we MUST think first in terms of ‘no excessive birth. Humane Education will create a world where each child vows to spay or neuter their own pets, give their pets what’s best for the pet and, not just what the human ‘wants’ them to have,…and, of course to educate others to do the same.” The informed person will always surpass those who ‘only assume’ and just continue on ‘because we’ve always done it this way.”
As seen in this article from Animal News Center, education sometimes needs to be 'In Your Face' in order to wake up a slumbering giant of ignorance. This is actually a perfect example of what an 'In Your Face' type campaign can accomplish if done correctly. These people actually stepped up and admitted they were totally unaware of these pets being killed until this series of events. Sometimes you absolutely have no choice but to make them see with their own eyes. This is not ‘scare tactics’, exaggerated figures or limited affects type journalism, but simple facts that do have an impact on each and every citizen.
Dog Euthanization to be Shown LIVE on Television by Ellen Murray This should be a mandatory topic for all communities to feature at least once a year. Video footage of a dog being euthanized at the Guilford County Animal Shelter (GCAS) in Durham, North Carolina will be shown on Saturday during a public access television program produced by the county sheriff. The same footage was featured on a major network news program several years ago and the effects were immediately noticeable. It is a powerful tool to make those who ‘think’ they understand what goes on with the overpopulation, actually face the truth – to make them wake up quickly. B.J. Barnes said he intends to show the footage in order to let people know what happens to the thousands of area animals that are not adopted. The sheriff's weekly program, which is broadcast by WGHP on channel 8, begins at 7 PM. WGHP also airs a weekly segment featuring one of the animals available for adoption at the GCAS. The sheriff said that after he showed the footage on local network primetime program five years ago, the initial reaction was outrage as people lined up at the county facility to adopt the dogs and cats and show their distain for what they assumed was a callous and uncaring sheriff, they learned quickly that these had been going on long before his arrival and that he only showed this to ‘shock’ the residents into a reality check.
It must have worked as well here in North Carolina as this ‘In Your Face’ style campaign has also worked in various other communities over the past 10 years. Within 6 months of the first showing in 1996, ads for litters in the papers were greatly reduced, adoptions increased and the number of people surrendering animals went down substantially.© 2002 Animal News Center, Inc., Suite 6E, 153 East 57th Street, New York, NY 10022.
Local and area Government funded efforts could also learn: Take this example of North Carolina's efforts to improve. In most North Carolina communities, animal welfare is a concept rooted in 19th century practices and programs. It goes like this: Let them breed, scoop up the strays, cage them in foul, unhealthy kennels, then kill them. Nearly a quarter of a million North Carolina dogs and cats met that fate last year. This is a true reflection of any given community and/or state across the nation. Ironically, the state has offered help for low-cost spaying and neutering programs for years. Most communities (including this one) ignored it. Just as they ignore the foundation grants out there that would help cut down on the unwanted animal population. Easier to rely on the old scoop 'em, cage 'em, kill 'em plan.
After a winter of hearings, a House study committee has proposed some advances into the 21st century, key among them a well-financed spay-neuter program. The money would come from a small tax on animal food. The plan would add 10 cents to a 20-pound bag of dry food and 2 cents to every can. In my household, with two largish dogs and one slightly plump cat, that might amount to an extra buck a month, at most. Those pennies would add up to an $8 million-a-year fund that would help animal shelters meet the new law's requirement that dogs and cats released from shelters must first be sterilized.
That is a far better answer to our pet overpopulation than the present system, which either kills the extras or warehouses them in no-kill shelters that are hardly the optimum life for what we lovingly call our "companion animals."
Here is the problem that our animal gurus have yet to face and handle. Once a problem is labeled and blame placed, many people feel their work is completed. The belief that the problem is caused by the blamed party is continually reaffirmed with rhetoric. Attention is now focused on a simple, one-step solution: changing the behavior of the blamed party. The development of alternative approaches is ignored. But most problems are not amenable to simple, one-step solutions. If the U.S. auto industry had succeeded in placing the blame for its woes squarely enough on Japanese imports to obtain a trade embargo, I suspect I would now be driving a piece of crap from G.M. that cost me $50,000. Instead, the U.S. auto industry gradually recognized that the problems it faced were multifaceted, complex, and influenced by the larger context of economics. Reviving sales of U.S.-made cars required responses to many issues, not just one, among them high interest rates, the strength of the dollar, government regulation, poor labor/management relations, outmoded technology, lack of touch with consumer needs, a centralized decision process, and awkward work design.
Much as the auto industry initially focused upon simply placing blame, I feel many humane organizations have focused too intently upon purebred breeding per se as the cause of pet overpopulation, and consequently have promoted legislative action to halt breeding before fully understanding which animals are surplus, where they come from, and what approaches are most likely to effectively reach the people responsible for their existence. Our movement's purpose is affirming the sanctity of life and Earth, and in many years of assisting non-profit organizations, we have yet to encounter a group that has a comprehensive performance assessment program to ensure that stringent quality standards are met.
Nothing illustrates this more vividly than the historical record of the oldest and largest segment of our movement -the animal shelter community. We single them out for many reasons, not the least being that in most smaller cities and counties throughout the country, they represent the only voice for other beings, a voice that is often inaudible. The conclusions drawn from the review of shelters are distressing, but the lessons to be derived apply equally to all of us. Much of what occurs in shelters is so bizarre that it almost defies comprehension, much less vivid description.
Let's begin with the statistical nightmare one finds when examining shelters. Although shelters have existed in this country for well over a century, there is simply no reliable statistical base from which even the most basic information can be derived. One does not have to be an applied statistician to understand the gravity of not having accurate information, for without the existence of reliable historical and contemporary data, it's literally impossible to draw any conclusions that would be able to support any real findings. Surrounded by the deaths of millions of precious beings, this industry has demonstrated neither the concern nor competency to even validate the information upon which it bases life and death decisions.
How is it possible that this multi-billion dollar industry never formed an effective national association, funded and administered by shelter members, to properly gather and validate critical information? Nor has the shelter community established a coordinated national effort to protect the interests of the companion animals they profess to serve. Compounding this statistical farce, the shelter community, has to undertake a reasonably accurate count of how many shelters exist or even explicitly define what constitutes a shelter. Sadly, due to this limitation, the best a recent national survey could do was estimate a range of between 3,000-5,000 shelters. Using the mean figure, this indicates that much of widely utilized national shelter statistics carry an astounding 25 percent margin of error-and that assumes accurate sampling and reporting! Given the unreliability of national population and shelter statistics, some shelters have taken local surveys to compile their own data. animal protection advocates greatly applauds their initiative, but we have spent wakeful nights reviewing surveys that illustrate good intentions but sorrowful execution.
Instead of seeking the pro bono assistance of qualified market research analysts, shelters often develop surveys that are so flawed in construction and sampling methods as to be all but worthless. It's evident that the shelter community either doesn't know enough or care enough to meet even the most marginal professional standards. We intend no disrespect, but from the perspective of the vulnerable shelter animals, one is sadly reminded of the old adage: I can take care of my adversaries, but God save me from my friends. The following is my version of a 'lesson plan' to be used by anyone passionate about changing the way in which our society truly views and respects the animals.
OBJECTIVE: This information will clearly teach the students that there are so many aspects to providing pets with the proper thoughts, care and treatment. It outlines all major points of why so many pets are relinquished or lost each year as well as proving that this can be STOPPED if only people have the correct information to work from. Throughout this program, it will also instill within the students, that compassion and understanding for 'other than themselves' is critical in thinking and acting throughout life and provides many benefits towards character development. See IMPORTANCE OF HUMANE EDUCATION TIME: 3-4 class periods per school year (average class period 45 min each) MATERIALS NEEDED: Are listed throughout this outline. A Complete listing of materials that are applicable are listed at HUMANE EDUCATION page. http://www.21stcenturycares.org/hecategories.htm
Everyone must recognize that I am not a teacher by trade. I've been asked for a Lesson Plan by many and I didn't even know what that was for the longest time. The reason I am so comfortable and do such a good job with students, regardless of age, is that I know I'm sharing information with them that they have not heard before and that will change their lives. Humane Education, as it is known to be, is the whole idea of environment, compassion for all animals and so forth. I am only dealing with responsibility and education regarding our companion animals. For those who provide me with an audience, I believe they will be more likely to look into some form of further humane education later on. It's my opinion, but I feel that trying to discuss more angles or topics involved, would dilute the message and the students would not retain the info we hope regarding the animals. The entire package is for those who have an actual curriculum where time allows this. You can visit any grade level you choose. I never go to those below 5th grade as I don't feel they can quite grasp what they should in order to follow the program. This view is supported by the NEA and several teacher's organizations as well.
You must realize that the high school students are sometimes more difficult to speak to, but they are also the ones who will be out on their own in 1-3 years and NEED to hear this at least once before they begin to make the same mistakes so many others have before them. So, do everything possible to see that the higher grades are included in your efforts. (not unlike drunk driving and criminal activities, the majority of abuse and neglect cases are from males ages 18 - 30) The average class period is approximately 45 minutes. Therefore, that is likely the time you will be allotted. Of course, you can always take advantage of additional time with questions and answers. Even with the 45 minutes, there are interruptions and the delay in starting by at least 5 min also. I usually begin with some humor or something funny or silly to get their attention. I 'apologize' for misleading the students with my appearance, but contrary to rumors, I am not Brittany Spears' double. (I'm 50, short, somewhat weighty, practically bald) and that gets a chuckle from any age group.
To let the older students know that I am here to give them information and I expect them to pay attention, I usually begin by asking 'How many of you feel that the info I'm about to give you is something you already know? You already know all there is to know about how to keep a pet." You'll have a couple smarties that will raise their hands. I have some chairs available and ask them to come up front. I place the chairs right where I plan to stand and tell them, 'if you know all there is to know, then I'm going to ask you to sit here to keep me honest and correct me when I make mistakes, OK?
Personally, I wouldn't dream of visiting a school or group meeting for this, without having a rescue animal that is safe with everyone, to have a real time visual they can touch and experience during my speaking. It brings the presentation's message to a whole different and meaningful level. Of the 70+ schools I've visited in 8 western states, I believe all but two made it very clear they would not allow any dogs. I took them along anyway, since the van was our daytime home and without fail, they were welcomed into each and every school and became instant celebrities. It helps that I look confident and do nothing to bring attention to the dogs - they bring enough to themselves by being so diversified in size, shape and color, plus being well behaved ladies and gentlemen. Mine don't bark, won't leave my site, don't jump, but absolutely can hardly contain their excitement - anticipating all those hands that want to pet them. See the article from Chicagoland Tails and Monterey, CA newspaper.
I will still only provide suggestions and outlines for those who wish to go into the schools. I could give you a 'word for word presentation, but, you would have to re work it to be comfortable with the way you naturally speak, plus, what I speak of in my presentations may not be applicable or relevant in your specific community. OK. I hope you have a list of the pages from my "I CAN HELP" page. I feel strongly that anyone visiting a school or youth group should read all the pages in the first category listing. It is 36 pages of a wide variety of things you can and should discuss with the audience. As I say in my intro to that page, we don't use terms like 'shelters' or euthanasia and putting to sleep. Those are inappropriate for such a horrific and neglectful situation that is occurring.
You will be surprised at the number of people - even adults - who are unaware of the statistics and the irresponsibility of humans with their pets. To soften the horror to make it sound nicer is simply doing one thing: it makes the audience see that it's not nearly as bad as it really is. They go to dog pounds or county facilities and there, they are killed. Some with injections, some with the gas chamber, and even some with bullets from high school boys who are making extra money.

The only page that I use in its' entirety is the Spay and Neuter Story for Kids.
This is how I begin every presentation. You'll see that it starts out very blunt, but immediately changes to how they can do their part to stop this by listening and then making different decisions than previous generations have made. They will do that with knowledge of the facts. They may or may not do this with a softened and politically correct means of using the more accepted words. I just don't see it. Some other pages that are 'musts' in their content, are 'Backyard Breeders' 'I died today" the 'Real World' "In or Out' and 'Your Next Pet" If you could read these pages enough times to be familiar with their content, you could present a decent program in your own words. After doing rescue for so many years, the 'pregnancy' and 'allergies' pages have strong substantial impacts with those I speak to.
It is amazing to realize the number of animals which are relinquished due to the woman's first pregnancy or their unjust fears and incorrect assumptions of allergies. There is no doubt, it will seem overwhelming and frightening at first. But anyone who has the sense and compassion to recognize the importance of humane education, certainly has the information through their experiences to speak for 45 minutes. MAKE SURE YOU TAKE A WRITTEN LIST OF TOPICS.
Keep them with you and don't be afraid to look at them. I always do. My outline is this:
1. The absolute evils of having a litter of puppies or kittens along with the importance to the health of the pets to provide spaying and neutering at a young age.
2.The need for everyone with a pet to have some form of access to proper training and guidance. It's very clear that most people assume they have the talent to train a dog, but the likelihood is that they were just lucky. Most likely is that they won't take the appropriate time to do what is necessary to bring the puppy to the level of behavior they wish to have and will end up getting rid of the dog unfortunately.
3. The importance of becoming the 'guardian' of the proper pet for you and your family and the lifestyle you live. Definition of 'owner': One who has possession of an object, thing or piece of real estate. Definition of 'guardian' One who adopts a child or pet for the sole purpose of providing necessary care, compassion, guidance, love, exercise, food, water and shelter for a safe healthy existence.
4. The benefits of community involvement. Do not stand idly by and allow abuse, neglect or other ignorance by humans. Help the community to learn to better through information sharing.' If you don't tell them, who will?" Many ideas can be located here.
5. The importance of providing the appropriate needs for your pet, not necessarily what your ego decides is best for them. Dogs tied to a post, tethered to a fence, kept in a small pen, etc. That is what the human wants for them and is not at all healthy for the pet.
6. How everyone can become involved on an individual basis by helping senior citizens and low income families by providing occasional vet trips or a few bags of dog food to prevent their pets from being relinquished to the animal facility unnecessarily.
7. The benefits of beginning with an adult dog from the dog pound as opposed to 'assuming' that they have the knowledge or understanding of how to properly train a new young puppy to meet their needs. (Having my five dogs in the classroom that are obviously very lovable and worthwhile, helps bring this point home with some foundation) Each one was an adult from the pound when I adopted him or her. The fact that one has kept a puppy, only means they were lucky, not necessarily a skilled or knowledgeable trainer. An adult dog from the pound is already spayed and neutered, vaccinated; past it's digging and chewing stage and will respond with love and affection as it has just come from a family who obviously didn't care. See 'Your Next Pet' for full argument.
8. The proven benefits for humans as well as their pets of providing 'indoor' sleeping arrangements for their pets. Reduced allergies for children, improved allergenic reactions for adults who already have them, as well as a longer and healthier life for the pets as well. After all, if a dog is to protect its most important family members, it can't do so from the back yard if it has no access to the inside areas. (Reference: Associated Press article by Justin Pritchard in San Francisco) See 'Inside or Outside' pets for full story.
9. A 'guard dog' is one who has been properly trained for the job and understands its boundaries. It is NOT a dog someone throws into the back yard with no guidance or training. The latter will only prove to annoy your neighbors and cause your family undue troubles with barking, biting or destruction of property. This is a lazy mans' way of making excuses for not providing the pet with the proper care, socialization and compassion required by all pets.
10. Why the perfect family should consider a second compatible dog or cat as a companion for the first one. (Too many deserving and loving animals will die if not, and dogs and cats are social animals and enjoy the company of other compatible dogs and cats) They play with and train each other and offer much needed exercise for each other.
11. The absolute necessity for having proper identification on your pet at ALL TIMES. (I.e. 4th of July, New Years Eve, tornadoes, earthquakes and various events that frighten your pet to where they will escape out of fear.)
12. To discuss the proven links between animal abuse and future criminal activity as adults. (Reference Houston Chronicle Story Nov 29, 2000 by Jo Ann Zuiga: "Animal Abuse May Be Warning Sign) Also see this page.
13. IF you are forced to part with your beloved pet, remember to never take it to the local pound, but to a local rescue org. and NEVER place a "FREE TO GOOD HOME" ad in the paper. The 'whys' and the options. Rethink your decision to relinquish the pet. It has already given everything it has to try and please you and would certainly give it's life to protect you if need be. Don't dump it off for silly self-centered reasons, which could be rectified through some training tips or a few sacrifices on your part.
14. Make sure you select the appropriate pet for your family's lifestyle. If you live in a large high rise, you don't want a dog that needs to run 20 miles a day (Dalmatian) If you are less active family or one who is always on the run, you don't want to get a highly active dog. However, a Great Dane, as well as a German shepherd are good dogs for apartment living as they do not require the high energy exercise nor the volume of walks that many others do. Smaller dogs are usually NOT best for condo or apt living due to their excessive barking that disturbs the neighbors.

SUGGESTED PROJECTS FOR THOSE INTERESTED
1. To hopefully prepare a program in which the members will visit other schools in and around the local area to share this information and hopefully help others to form these humane education clubs in their schools as well. ***This helps the students with business planning, public speaking, speech preparations and much more. See Forming clubs
2. The first several meetings of this group can be enhanced through additional speakers from their local humane organizations, vets, dog trainers and animal control officers who will share their local problems with the students.
3. Offers to assist senior citizens and low income families with donated food and vet visits as well as training tips to improve the quality of the pets' lives as well as their own.
4. How to convince the public to obtain appropriate identification for all pets either through a simple engraved tag on the collar or micro-chipping. ***The excuse for not having proper I.D. is that their pets never leave their home. On the fifth of July for example, pounds and other animal control facilities are flooded with pets with no I.D. from fear of the fireworks the previous night. Nearly 150,000 are killed just due to this one annual event. So, if they had ID or had been placed inside the home as they should, this would not occur.
5. To tackle the project of holding an OFF SITE adoption program for those pets who would otherwise face certain death at the local facility. After all, the public rarely goes to the pound, as it is a very sad and depressing place. They will, however attend an event at a local city park where each animal is leashed and accompanied by a volunteer with a card containing the autobiography of that given pet. *** People do NOT want to go to the dog pound or county facility due to it's gruesome smells, sights, sounds, etc. This allows people to experience these dogs in a happy, playful atmosphere of adoptability. For each volunteer, there is one dog on a leash. That volunteer has a 3X5 card with all the details of said pet and will allow prospective adopting families to walk the dog and get to know it. This all takes place with the volunteer right at their side at all times and inside an enclosed, fenced area.
6. Try to tackle a project such as opening a local dog park where the dogs and their guardians come to socialize, run and play with each other in a securely fenced area or help adopt some older 'un adoptable' dogs to senior citizens who live alone - a win win situation. *** Creative thinking is the true success story in all this.
7. Obtaining much needed coverage in their school newspaper to help other students to learn proper care-giving procedures and responsibilities for their pets. Not to mention the benefits to their org. as well as the local community of having nice coverage within their local papers and TV. news. *** This will help them see how networking, publicity and the sharing of knowledge can truly make the difference in this tragedy that is really so very easy to stop.
8. The need to speak out and get involved in issues that surround your family and those you care about. To take action and vote on issues and for candidates who strongly support and stand by ideals that help your local area to grow and improve the quality of life for all souls who reside there. Do not sit idly by while a neighbor neglects or abuses an animal by tying it up to a post or allowing it to go without food or water. Do not sit idly by while an important initiative gets defeated in your local elections. This will assist students to understand their government. They will learn how their local government works, ways to lobby their government, and increase awareness and appreciation for how the system works in which they live.
9. Letter writing campaigns, neighborhood 'reach' programs and other means of truly helping the local population as well as local government officials to provide improved care for their pets. ****This will help students' writing abilities, vocabulary, English skills, and grammar. I would strongly advise that you take along a half dozen additional printed pages i.e. Jim Willis' written pieces. I have four of them on my site. "How Could You?", ''True Story" and "Free Kittenz" are my two favorites. Then some additional pages that you will leave with the teacher.
Hopefully at a later date, in an effort to re mind them of all they learned today, they will either discuss one of these - each at different times, or do an essay on them, etc. You really don't' want to just leave and not have them discuss this topic again or they will not retain the information provided. Remember, the compassion and understanding they will learn from this program can and will change the world in which we live. There is no doubt that education in one form or another is absolutely the ONLY means of our society ever seeing resolve to these problems.

THE VERY FINAL STATEMENTS:
I am convinced that we can make the necessary changes to police our industry and to be acutely aware of what others do as well. I am also certain that, once more people recognize the need for change, that the changes will come easily and quickly. The difficulty is for people to realize that I'm not just a nay sayer or trouble maker, but one who truly wants to see some forward movement and to solve some of the 'simple' problems that we face. But, there are still things we need to accomplish and problems to tackle before we can begin a good, strong march towards our mutual goals.
These final pages will review some of them. The crucial historical process for humane leaders was moving from compassionate oversight of governmental agencies to directly operating the majority of kill shelters. Motivated by the best of intentions, they sought to improve conditions and provide gentler ends to tragic lives by assuming the traditional animal control functions. They didn't foresee the damaging long-term effects of devoting most of their energy to collection, processing, and killing, leaving sparse resources for bold preventive measures; nor did they realize the devastating consequences of the mixed-message they were sending to society about the value of non-human life; and, most significant to this analysis, they couldn't have known what they were doing to themselves — and to all who followed them in subsequent years.
It is often stated that the public is indifferent to this tragedy, but that is precisely what was said about drunk driving, cigarette smoking, and a myriad of other social issues before intense and unremitting pressure was brought to bear. People are initially unresponsive to most issues that fail to touch them personally, not simply because they lack adequate information, but because they either disagree with the position stated or just don't care. It is our responsibility to make them care. We have reached the public with "cute and cuddly" spay/ neuter messages for decades, but, without the necessary stigma to fundamentally alter entrenched behavior patterns.
With no price to pay in terms of social censure, people continue having litters of animals with little regard for the devastating consequences. We must sharply raise the price, stigmatizing irresponsibility to such a degree that social condemnation is its constant companion.
Humane Religion and the failure of today's organized religion to provide the occasional sermon that brings these tragic situations to light. After all, when the community experiences a rash of rapes or murders, the clergy are quick to include that into their sermons. So why is it that in every community as well as all congregations, there are those who, simply out of ignorance or lack of compassion, are failing to provide the necessary care and treatment of their very own companion animals - many resulting in unnecessary deaths, would they fail to include this in one way or another. Humane Education, at its roots, has benefits that are felt far and wide in improved behavior of students, increased attendance, much more awareness of others, a noticeably raised level of achievement scores, more respectful nature of addressing adults and others around them and gaining a less violent resolution technique when challenged - not to mention the obvious - the lives that are spared and provided with the proper treatment that will extend their lives in a healthier, happier way.
So, if the above reasons do not spur the preachers and priests on to a more compassionate style of ministries or simple common sense isn't enough for the local or national ministries to take notice and begin giving more appropriate sermons to their listeners, maybe some of the following articles can convince them to give a humane style sermon at least once a year. If their followers are truly respectful of God and his teachings, they will learn how to improve their pets existence as well - giving the pets a noticeably improved chance of living out a healthy life in a manner pleasing the man above.
It is patently absurd and maddening to partake in religious services and witness this disgraceful neglect and ironic distortion of the base fundamental taught in virtually all major religions, the Golden Rule. Surely if there is a blueprint for human behavior whether you're religious or irreligious, it's the Golden Rule! "Do Unto Others as YouWould Have Them Do Unto You!"
A child could see that this applies a thousand-fold to innocent, defenseless animals! Perhaps too, the major religions should consider the words of Socrates, who, although an atheist, surpassed hypocrisy with his dictum: "There is but one good, knowledge; there is but one evil, ignorance." The more you consider that, the more profoundly it affects you." I looked at all the caged animals in the shelter....the castoffs of human society. I saw in their eyes love and hope, fear and dread, sadness and betrayal. And I was angry. "God" I said, 'this is terrible! Why don't you do something?" God was silent for a moment and then He spoke softly. "I have done something'' He replied. "I created you. "By Jim Willis

Industry Failure:
Nothing illustrates this more vividly than the historical record of the oldest and largest segment of our movement -the animal shelter community. We single them out for many reasons, not the least being that in most smaller cities and counties throughout the country, they represent the only voice for other beings, a voice that is often inaudible.
Today's shelter community is seen a slumbering giant, not in a derisive sense, but to accurately portray the present state of this "industry." Much of what occurs in shelters is so bizarre that it almost defies comprehension, much less vivid description. Let's begin with the statistical nightmare one finds when examining shelters. Although shelters have existed in this country for well over a century, there is simply no reliable statistical base from which even the most basic information can be derived. One does not have to be an applied statistician to understand the gravity of not having accurate information, for without the existence of reliable historical and contemporary data, it's literally impossible to draw any conclusions that stand the test of empirical scrutiny. Surrounded by the deaths of millions of precious beings, this industry has demonstrated neither the concern nor competency to even validate the information upon which it bases life and death decisions. How is it possible that this multi-billion dollar industry never formed an effective national association, funded and administered by shelter members, to properly gather and validate critical information? Nor has the shelter community established a coordinated national effort to protect the interests of the companion animals they profess to serve.
Without any organized pressure from shelters, it's no wonder the U.S. Census Bureau refuses to include household animals, and the lack of this vital demographic data is devastating in terms of effective program formulation and assessment. As a result, a hodgepodge of crude formulas are used to estimate companion animal population, all of which possess a statistical margin of error so staggering as to render population estimates virtually useless.
People just do not realize the potential we have by giving just a bit of our day to doing something different in lieu of the same or related thing. It actually opens up various avenues that leads to the same goals. Some of these newly discovered venues will be noticeable improvements from the road taken by everyone else. We just have to be open to change, smart enough to recognize when change is necessary and determined enough to make a few of these changes in spite of the conflicts from others.
Ignoring these new avenues is the simple largest factor in the animal movement not moving forward in a more productive manner. I find the today that the politicians do not look at things the way we do. Even one of the county commissioners in Clark County, Nevada told me straight up "we do not have time for animal problems - we have human problems which are more important. At least that is all we hear from our constituents.
I hear that from my working partners in politics all around the nation as well. Because the animal people are so busy working on today's animals which stem from yesterday's problems, they don't take the time to recognize that it is actually tomorrow that can and will make the changes that everyone really wants. "It's not through the large animal organizations that anything of any measurable amount can be achieved. I believe that has been proven substantially over the decades..
With the ever growing number of communities across the nation who are killing 80% of the animals that come into the city or county run pounds, how many of them have actually been approached by one of the larger animal orgs offering guidelines or financial assistance to make the necessary changes in local laws, implementing a humane education program or changing the elected officials to garner the necessary support required for these plans to work? Politicians forget who out they in office - the people - and the people have concerns (when they learn about them) in which they are interested.
They really do listen to the voters - it is, after all, how they secure re election votes. If enough people around the nation had suddenly begun to believe that the color red has negative properties and that blue was the better alternative, you better bet your last dollar that any and every candidate across this nation would be seen with blue in their outfit - completely void of any red.
Politicians need to be educated as well. They are always looking for ways to save money. So, it's up to us to show them the facts. In New Hampshire, a statewide program cut the cost of neutering pets to $10 for poor residents. The state saved $3 in animal control costs for every $1 spent on the program. And it saved animals' lives. Over an eight-year period between 1993 and 2001, the state recorded a nearly 75 percent drop in the number of dogs and cats killed.
Cities that manage to stem their animal kill rates don't stop with sterilization. They often pair those services with extensive public education. Those efforts let the public know the size of the problem and what happens to thousands of unwanted pets every year. Cities have taken out billboards, allowed euthanasia to be recorded and shown by news media, and walked shelter dogs wearing the dates they'll be killed if they aren't adopted.2004 was an election year.
The question I heard most was "are you pro life or pro choice?" This is a good question for people running for national office, our U.S. Senates and U.S. Congressman. It has nothing to do with state, county and local government.
Why were we not asking the state, county and local politicians if they were in favor of humane education in our schools and if they favored adoption programs as opposed to euthanasia of animals?. These are issues that state, county and local politicians have say over. Clearly, if these two topics were hammered into their heads now, they would appear in their platforms for election campaigns later on. "We don't think we need to shock the community by showing them 50 dead animals," The city of Charlotte, then took on a more gentle approach and it was a downright pure undeniable failure. $4 million a year to catch, house and kill animals, it has done little to address the cause of the problem.
When a local group convinced one of the network TV stations to air live euthanasia during their eve news each night for a full week, the message was clear and they experienced a drastic decrease of 50% in the following weeks that continued until a new program could be implemented. Elected officials do everything in their power not to upset any voter or offend any one of their constituents. It may cost them votes. So, it will become very clear as to which ones are actually 'on board' with saving the animals by their actions.
Clearly stated by a county commissioner in Mohave County Arizona, if everyone in rescue and/or animal rights would ask these questions of their local politicians, we would change the face of local government. Clearly, there are millions and millions of people involved in rescue and rights across the nation. If we all voted for candidates who are in tune with our issues, we could change the face of local government. His brother is in government in another state as well as his brother in law. They would both tell everyone the same thing.
People do not realize the power that is within their grasp. This is what I think would do more that anything else. If the animal people would just simply assert themselves to the elected officials and state two things clearly, not only would they have a say in the government's decisions since the politicians want to be re-elected, they would actually see those changes come about. They (the animal people ) would actually have more of a voice in the government than any lobbying effort known today - including the NRA and others combined. The two things would be to enforce and clean up existing animal protection laws and the implementation of a mandatory humane education curriculum in our schools. There is no other way to start the ball rolling.
If the next generation grows up with the same ignorance that this generation has grown up with, then not only are rescuers going to be facing the same level of unwanted animals in the shelters around the nation and on the streets, they will likely be facing even more since the population is growing. Example: From 1992 to 2002, Americans spent over $20billion on animal protection related taxes and donations to various organizations to protect and solve. We are talking about millions and millions of people involved here. How much can you honestly point to on a nationwide scale that is a noticeable change resulting from these tremendous figures? Reason?
Each effort is singular in nature, non communicative of other efforts, many times duplicated in corruptive overlaps and many times this combination simply fails to fill in the gaps that would make these efforts more cohesive and successful. Cities and counties which have seen successful results and saved tax-payers dollars as well have all implemented the following programs: Increase sterilizations and public education, especially in low-income areas.• Increase the number of animals adopted from the shelter.• Embed microchips in animals who leave the shelter so, if they're picked up as strays, the owners can be identified.• Trap and neuter feral cats.• Help pet owners train their adopted animals so they don't develop behavioral problems and get returned to the shelter.
Lets not forget the issue of pet limit laws. This has been a hot button issue recently with over 1,000 communities across the nation, including PA, GA and IA eliminating their mandatory pet limit laws for reasons of unconstitutional groundings.

Pet Limit Laws: Closing the Door to Loving Homes by San Fransisco SPCA, Proponents of pet limit laws argue that these ordinances are necessary to stop animal neglect and abuse caused by people who take in more animals than they can adequately care for. Others claim that pet limits are necessary to ensure sanitary conditions, or to maintain safe and pleasant neighborhoods. But are pet limit laws necessary to address abuse, neglect, unreasonable noise, and lack of sanitation? Or, do they end up limiting the availability of loving homes and putting the lives of dogs and cats at risk?
The San Francisco SPCA has considered the various claims made for strict pet limit laws and found little in the way of evidence, or common sense, to support them. What we found was that pet limit laws:• are unnecessary to protect the well-being of people and animals• are arbitrary and intrusive• penalize responsible pet owners• force many caregivers to stop providing care to homeless animals• put the lives of even well cared-for animals at risk. At the same time that household limits discourage responsible individuals from providing a good home for more needy animals, they do not prevent an irresponsible one from acquiring unlimited animals.
Unfortunately, caring can’t be mandated, and a pet limit law will only end up punishing those who care. Millions of compassionate people provide dogs and cats with food, love, and shelter in their homes. Others may even put aside their own needs in order to care for beloved pets. Still others work tirelessly to feed, foster, and rehabilitate strays and unwanted abandoned animals, all at their own expense.
For every one of these caregivers, a pet limit law may exact a heavy toll. Each of these individuals may face citations, fines, other penalties, and even confiscation of the animals they love. For these reasons, The San Francisco SPCA opposes legislation arbitrarily limiting the number of pets a person can care for in their home.

PET LIMIT LAWS ARE UNNECESSARY
Are pet limit laws necessary to address abuse, neglect, unreasonable noise, and lack of sanitation? Do pet limit laws protect the well-being of people and animals?
In our view, they do not. Whereas one individual may be able to responsibly care for and nurture several animals, another may be unable to care for even one. And if problems arise, enforcement agencies already have ample ammunition at their disposal in terms of animal welfare, health and property rights laws. In fact, unsanitary conditions, excessive noise, and interference with property are all unlawful in virtually every community—regardless of whether pets inhabit the premises or not.

PET LIMIT LAWS ARE INTRUSIVE AND ARBITRARY
Just how are pet limits determined? In one community, the limit might be two pets. In others, four, five, eight, even twenty pets might be allowed. More often than not, the number is arbitrarily chosen. Enforcement is also arbitrary. In response to concerns about pet limit laws, some communities have admitted that these ordinances “will be enforced on a complaint basis, and pets which are maintained indoors or do not raise the ire of neighbors will not generate enforcement.” While it may sound reassuring to some, this justification leaves the door wide open for pet limit laws to be used as a weapon of retribution in neighbor disputes over concerns totally unrelated to pets. Laws that regulate a person’s behavior inside their home should seek an appropriate balance between the public's safety and welfare and the individual's right to privacy.
But while pet limit laws are highly intrusive, there is little, if any, corresponding benefit to public safety. What good is gained from an uncompromising prohibition against more than a limited number of pets, particularly if they are confined to an owner's property and create no problems? Certainly, if neighbors are totally unaware of their presence, prohibiting pets does not in any way protect or maintain anyone's health, happiness or peace of mind.
And what about multi-pet households where neighbors do not mind or even enjoy the presence of these animals? In fact, there is no benefit gained from such a prohibition—nor is there likely to be any enforcement. Should government pass laws that are not going to be enforced? Should communities outlaw behavior that does not impact neighbors or interfere with the rights of others? Local governments have embraced the position that because responsible multi-pet households will not generate enforcement, these residents need not fear violating the law.
In essence, local governments are making outlaws out of normally law-abiding citizens and telling them it is OK to break the law as long as they don’t get caught! Passing laws that aren’t enforced or are enforced sporadically is unfair and counterproductive. Few people are likely to comply with a pet limit law that isn’t enforced. And those who voluntarily comply can probably be counted among the most responsible pet owners in the community.
There is little equity or sense in enacting a law that only ends up penalizing the very people whose behavior is already exemplary. And such a view undermines our respect for the law. Needless to say, truly irresponsible pet owners will not be affected. If the law is not enforced, they are free to ignore it. If it is selectively enforced against them, they are likely to surrender their animals, adding to the numbers of dogs and cats killed, or abandon them, adding to some of the perceived problems the law was intended to solve.

PET LIMIT EXEMPTION PERMITS ARE ALSO INTRUSIVE AND RISKY
Many local jurisdictions enacting pet limit laws allow caretakers who have more than the allowable number of pets to apply for an “exemption” permit. Therefore, these jurisdictions claim, “responsible” pet owners need not fear the law. This view is shortsighted and would put multi-pet households in a Catch-22: choosing between not seeking a permit and violating the law on the one hand; or, applying for a permit, but risking exposure and confiscation of their pets if they are denied.
In other words, multi-pet households would fear applying for a permit, because to do so would expose them to penalties and possible loss of their beloved companions if denied a permit. And, in some jurisdictions, the exemption permit requires a “kennel” license—which cannot be granted in many neighborhoods due to zoning restrictions, no matter how "responsible” the caretaker. In short, no exemption at all!

PET LIMIT LAWS PUT THE LIVES OF ANIMALS AT RISK
It is not uncommon for rescued animals, particularly those who are hard-to-place by virtue of abandonment or abuse, to be in a “foster” environment for long periods of time. Foster homes are in critically short supply in almost every community and it is common for such homes to temporarily house more animals than the average pet owner. In addition, there are countless Good Samaritans who feed and care for neighborhood strays and feral cats.
Many pet limit laws define these individuals as "owners” for purposes of enforcing local ordinances. It is ironic that groups and individuals rescuing and caring for homeless and unwanted dogs and cats (often at personal expense) should be targeted for restrictive and punitive legislation. Of greater concern, caregivers and rescue groups may be forced to stop caring for foster pets or homeless cats, because to do so would violate the local pet limit law, resulting in needy animals being denied care, and also leading to increased euthanasia at taxpayer expense. By contrast, the maintenance of multi-pet households or the feeding of homeless cats—including sterilization, food, and veterinary care—is uniformly accomplished by private citizens at no cost to local government or taxpayers.
And pet owners targeted for enforcement may be forced to surrender their well cared for animals to local shelters where they, too, are at risk for euthanasia and where taxpayers will have to foot the bill.

PET LIMIT LAWS CLOSE THE DOOR TO LOVING HOMES
A town council on the East Coast recently expanded its animal control law to include a provision making it illegal for any resident to own more than five cats. One resident, a 69-year old woman who cared for homeless neighborhood cats, was threatened with fines for violating the law despite the fact that she had sterilized and vaccinated all the cats. She was given two options by local authorities: turn away the cats who came to her back door looking for food and water; or trap them and turn them over to the animal control facility where they would likely be killed.
For someone who very much loved animals, this was no choice at all. Distraught by the threat of legal sanctions, however, she was forced to comply. And in a county neighboring our own, an elderly couple who cared for several sterilized and well-cared for cats at their private residence were threatened with citations and fines because of a pet limit law that allowed for the caring of only four cats. Under threat, the cats had to be relocated to avoid the risk that they would be impounded and killed at the local animal control facility.
The cats lost the only home and caregivers they had ever known, and the couple lost their beloved companions. Just as pets already in homes may be threatened by limit laws, homeless pets awaiting the chance for a loving new home are also at risk as potential adopters are discouraged from adopting a stray or visiting the local shelter and saving a life.
For much of history, animals were considered mere commodities who pulled our wagons, provided the products for our farms, herded our sheep, and kept our barns free of mice. During the last century, however, socio-economic and moral changes in society at large have produced changes in the status of animals as well. Many animals—dogs and cats in particular—are now overwhelmingly companions instead of servants. In addition, government laws and services have evolved from promoting animals as property to protecting them as cherished pets. At the same time, pets do so much good for the community: people of all ages, but particularly the elderly and the young, enjoy their companionship. For single people, dogs and cats can offer a welcome relief from loneliness. For children, an animal in the home provides warmth and unconditional love, and teaches responsibility and consideration for the needs of another creature. Those who suffer from disease or injury often experience a therapeutic benefit from their presence.
For the lonely, a pet can provide an incentive to get up in the morning. Animals can also provide a sense of safety and security, allowing many people freedom they would not otherwise have. While pet ownership may not be a fundamental right, it is unquestionably an integral aspect of our daily life—which cannot be dismissed lightly and should not suffer unwarranted limits. In our view, there is little justification for targeting well-cared for animals and putting them at risk for impoundment and euthanasia.
Pet limit laws were proposed and defeated in large and small cities throughout the U.S. in 2001, including Fort Thomas, KY, Richmond, VA, Cherry Hill, NJ, Gwinett Co., GA, and Springfield, IL. Along with nearly one thousand cities, counties and three states over the past five years alone. This success can be attributed to the efforts of concerned cat/dog owners and breeders, rescue groups and feral cat caretakers who spoke out strongly to their lawmakers. The only reasons why pet limits still exist. The present means have proven across the country not to work at all. The present means of limiting to 3 or 4 cannot be enforced because the licensing approach has been a total failure. Then when good people end up with more pets and are willing and able to furnish the care and attention the pets need, they are faced with large fines, court dates and even watching as the city or county removes them JUST TO WATCH THEM DIE ALONG WITH THE OTHERS.
Presently, the law will only allow compassionate, responsible homes to even become a recognized rescue by paying exhorbitant fees to the county or city, (sometimes up to $10,000 before being issued a ‘kennel permit’) assuring that the kill rate remain unchanged in that area. Thus, forcing good people to go underground or take on another hobby or cause – again, leaving the number of animals who die to go unchanged. CARE, COMPASSION, HEALTH, SAFETY AND LACK OF DANGER OR NUISANCE TO SURROUNDING RESIDENTS SHOULD BE THE FOUNDATION FOR NEW LAWS IN YOUR COMMUNITY. The simple fact that ‘’That’s the way it’s been done for years’’ is not an argument you need to listen to. If your community deems them ‘property’ then they cannot impose the limits per our constitution. If, however, they should change their wording to use the term ‘guardian’ for the human caretaker and ‘companion’ for the pet, then you bring in another beneficial means of handling those humans who do not provide the proper and necessary care for the animals they are responsible for.
With over 1,000 communities and counties and three states which have now rendered pet limitation laws to either be unlawful for constitutional reasons or raised the limits to more favorable levels to the residents, while changing the responsibilities of those who care for them. (i.e. not allowing pets to be chained as a sole means of containment, no breeding without a substantial breeders permit – regulating this by enforcing all papers to display this license in all ads for puppies and kitties and a severe penalty for any human who’s dog has bitten or attacked any other human or dog.)
Once we elect governments in tune with the issues, we can confront them and educate them that spending millions of dollars in shelter contract and euthanasia projects is money should be use for public education and no-kill shelter facilities. Maybe a little expensive at first but will pay for itself in the near future. Example Clark County, Nevada is spending 1.2 million a year to run the current shelter. The new contact for 2005 (20 year contract) is 1.6 million per year. Multiply that by every shelter or pound in this nation.
Yes, some have smaller budgets but the major cities are spending a lot more just to kill the animals. 2002 the city of Las Vegas and Clark County euthanized 24,500 animals. This county has no humane education in the schools at any level. So they will always be facing this same problem. This county also has no plan to attempt to adopt out more dogs and cats through programs that other cities have successfully implemented, so they are not operating anything less than a facility to kill animals. Clark County is Las Vegas.
To spend this amount of funding on nothing more than killing animals is an unconscionable waste of life and a needless drain on public money." Not one of the animal orgs came forward with an offer to help or any real life suggestions. They are all worried about yesterday's problems today and securing funding to stay afloat. Local and national projects of educating the children is very important.
Neither of these ideas takes money. They only take communication and persistence to educate those who can and will make these issues become laws that are sensible and enforceable. These ideas then become law at the voting booth. Plain and simple. Then, with many thanks to WWW.PET-ABUSE.COM we now see that there will be a much needed registry of animal abusers available to law enforcement across the nation. With the overwhelming research confirming the strong links between young people who abuse animals and the likelihood that they will grow into a life of more violent crimes if not recognized and corrected, this is going to become much more prevalent in our society. All for the good of every living being.

SURVEY:
The following is a survey we used throughout 7 states with 391 participants from 18-61 years of age who had pets. This survey can be used to find out much information regarding your local area and see what is really needed most. Just below are the findings from this particular application. This survey is to be filled out completely anonymously. NO one will ever know who filled out what survey or how that particular participant answered any question, so in order for us to obtain reliable information, we simply ask that you answer the questions to your best ability and to select the answer that comes the closest to the answer which reflects your current situation and opinions.
Some of the questions will not have the answer that adequately fits your personal situation. PLEASE USE ONLY THE OPTIONS PROVIDED. No write-in answers or additional comments. Simply use the one that is closest to your belief or situation. Our hopes are to receive honest and unbiased answers to the questions to follow. The survey is to be taken by those families and households who presently have at least one dog as a current pet. The answers you provide should reflect this pet or pets. Other pets such as birds, cats, ferrets, reptiles, etc. should not be reflected in the answers you give on this questionnaire. To see the results of a previous survey results & many options of tallying scores., please feel free to contact www.21stcenturycares.org/
Please see that only one person from each household participate in this survey.
Circle one.
I am UNDER THE AGE OF 18 I AM OVER THE AGE OF 19
All surveys must be filled out during the given classroom period or time frame allotted and NOT to be taken home or shared with others. This survey is NOT meant to be judgmental or critical of any person who is giving of their time to help us to gather the information requested, so we do urge honesty in providing the information we are seeking. Each question must be answered or the entire questionnaire will be void. Make NO CHANGES, alterations or additions to the questions as they are posed. If they do not apply to you at the present, please answer as you would if you were in that situation. Answer ALL questions. Please Circle the answer that best describes your present situation with regards to your pet dog.

1. Does your dog sleep inside your house at nighttime? (garage does not count as ‘inside’ for this particular question.  A. Every night B. Occasionally, depending on weather C. Never
2. Do you have more than one dog presently? Yes No
3. My dog is A. 5-20 # B. 25 – 50# C. 55-80# D. Huge
4. I/We originally adopted our dog as a companion animal. Yes No
5. The dog was intended for our child/children but they soon lost interest and did not follow up on their promise of responsibilities in caring for or playing with the dog. Therefore, the poor dog just sits alone in the back yard now. Yes No
6. Do you bathe your dog(s) A. weeklyB. monthlyC. annuallyD. never
7. How often do you take your dog to the vet?A. Every six mothsB. Once per yearC. Once every 3 yearsE. Only when obvious medical attention is required
8. Is your dog currently up to date on vaccinations? Yes No
9. Is your dog currently displaying some form of identification or microchip? Yes No
9a. If your answer is no, please circle one or more of the following.A. My dog never leaves the property and doesn’t need ID B. My dog always chews it off or looses his collars or tags C. I’ve just not gotten around to getting it done for him/her yet, but intend to.
10. Is your dog friendly with other people when they come to your house? Yes No
11. Is your dog friendly with other dogs if they should wander into your yard or come with a friend to visit? Yes No
12. I walk my dog A. Daily B. Once per week C. Never Keeping in mind this survey is completely anonymous and will never reveal the participant and is not meant to be judgmental to those who help us obtain this information, we remind you to do your best to select the appropriate answer that most closely reflects your present situation with your dog.
13. In the past two years, with the fast paced lifestyle Americans now face on a daily basis, divorces and extra curricular activities of the youngsters and teens in your household, have you ever accidentally forgotten to provide your dog with water or food on a given day? Yes No.
14. Do you socialize your dog with other dogs for play and exercise? Yes No
15. I try to get my dog to a dog park or play with other dogs A. FrequentlyB. RarelyC. Never
16. Do you ever socialize your dog with other people outside your household members? Yes No
17. Is your dog likely to bite a stranger who comes to the house? Yes No
18. Is your dog apt to become excited and seem vicious when approaching anther dog while on a walk? Yes No
19. Have your ever relinquished a dog to a dog pound, rescue organization or another family? Yes, No
20. If a seemingly nice couple with a 13 year old daughter approached your family and said they love your dog and offered you $100, would you consider letting the dog go with them? Yes No
21. Does your dog bark a lot at night? Yes No
22. Have your neighbors ever complained to your or your local animal regulations about the barking? Yes No
22a. If the answer is YES, please circle one of the following that best describes the steps You took to correct the problem.A. We paid a fine B. We sought professional training for the dog to curb this action C. We did nothing, as the complaining party is being unreasonable D. We made the decision to give the dog away or take him to the dog pound to avoid further problems with the neighbors or complaining parties E. We brought the dog inside the house at nighttime.
23. Does your dog jump on people when approached? Yes No
24. Has your dog been to the vet within the past 18 months for a regular check up? Yes No
25. Is your dog happy around children? Yes No
26. Is your dog safe to be around children with proper supervision? Yes No
27 Is your dog spayed or neutered? Yes No
27a. If the answer is Yes, at what age was the dog altered? A. About 6 months of age B. 18 months to 2 years of age C. Before we adopted him/her the answer is no, please circle the closest description of your reasoning or circumstances which have prevented this from taking place. A. I/We have not had the funds to do so. B. I/We wish to look into the possibility of having a litter of puppies C. I don’t feel it is necessary or normal to do this surgery
28. My opinion on having a litter of puppies is that it is A. Good for the dog to have at least one litter B. Ok for some people to do C. Not a good idea at all
29. When going on vacation for 3-4 day weekend, we usually A Try to take the dog along with us whenever possible B Take the dog to a boarding facility or pay a licensed pet sitter to care for him/her during our absence. C Leave it at home and ask a neighbor to check in on it once a day D Leave it outside and let the water run and provide plenty of food for the period we intend to be gone.
30. There have been occasions where I have hit or spanked my dog to enforce the ‘rules’ of the household. Yes No
31. On the occasion that I hit or spanked the dog, I made him/her cry from the action Yes No
32. My feeling is that is the only way to enforce the power structure when training a dog to understand who is in charge by using physical force. Yes No
33 When my present dog dies, I will get another dog. Yes No
34. When searching for a pet dog, I only consider puppies. Yes No
35. When adopting a dog, I usually consult some form of professional advice in regards to the proper care for this particular type dog and it’s needs and future training tips. Yes No
36. The thought of adopting an adult dog from the pound or rescue organization just does not appeal to me. Yes No
37. Dogs who have been turned in to the pound or rescue groups must have something wrong with it and that is why I would not consider one of these dogs. Yes No
37a. I have adopted a dog from a pound or rescue group in the past. Yes No
38. For your lifestyle, the thought of having TWO dogs that are compatible in size and energy is simply not appealing to me at all for the following reason A Can’t afford to feed two B I feel I can provide all the dogs needs myself C It simply never works well in my opinion D. I don’t feel my dog would tolerate another in his/her territory
39. My feeling on having two dogs at once in regards to the dog’s happiness and socialization is A If you can afford it and have the room, it would be ok. B Don’t really see the need or any benefits
40. If your dog was found to have an ear infection which the vet quoted as costing $500 - $600 to correct, would you make the decision to have it treated immediately? Yes No    If your answer is no, the reason would be A Don’t have the money B Don’t feel it is necessary or worth it C Other
41. Providing that you somewhat agree to the following definitions of the two words provided, Please read the following two definitions before answering the remaining questions. "OWNER" is some one who takes or has possession of a piece of property such as car, house, bicycle etc and has the right to do whatever he/she pleases with this property. "GUARDIAN’ is someone who has adopted or is given custody of a child or pet and is responsible for providing the necessary elements for a safe and happy existence such as nurturing, food, water, shelter, love and appropriate guidance in life.
42. I feel I am the owner of my pet. Yes No
43. I feel I am the guardian of my pet. Yes No.
44. I feel that the appropriate definition of which I am to and for my pet is decided by how I care for and treat my pet. Yes No
45. I feel that is a good way to view the human pet relationship and will try to be more like a guardian to my pet in the future. Yes No
46. The age of my last pet upon his/her death was A Young B. Middle aged C. Very Old (if pet did not die in your care, circle the one that would most closely match an educated guess)
47. The age of the oldest pet I’ve ever been responsible for was A 5-10 years B 11-15 years C Older
48. I’ve used paid professional dog training for at least one of my dogs in the past. Yes No
49. I plan to seek some form of professional guidance for the next dog I adopt. Yes No
50 When I transport my dog to and from various destinations, I allow him/her to ride in the back of the pick up truck. Yes No
51. When my dog accompanies me in the car, he/she is restrained with appropriate safety measures to assure his/her safe arrival. Yes No.
52 My dog (s) rarely even go outside the house except to use the bathroom. Yes No
53 My dog has a doggy door or other means of coming in and out of the house as he/she wishes. Yes No
54. My dog sleeps outside always, because I/we A. We want a guard dog for protection of our property B. We simply believe he is happier outside rather than inside C. We intend to allow some ‘inside’ time for the dog, but have just not gotten around to doing any training yet.
54a For those who circled ‘A" on the previous question, have you ever obtained any professional guidance or training for the ‘guard dog’ responsibilities .A Yes the dog is trained by a professional guard dog trainer B No, we just allow him/her to bark to notify us of any visitors
55. My dog is chained up most of the time, as he/she will A. Jump the fence and escape without restraints B. We simply have no fencing and is thought to be our only option. C. We don't want our dog to tear up the yard. D. Our dog is never tied up.
56. My dog does not have his/her current vaccinations due to the following reason A. Not enough money at this time B. Not enough time to make the visit to the vet C. It is my belief that it is just not that important. D. Does not apply - my pets are current.
57. I would probably consider allowing my dog to sleep inside the house at night time if he/she Was appropriately behaved and compatible to my home and lifestyle. Yes No
58. I have had dogs who escaped my care and were never again seen or heard from. Yes No
59. When training a new dog in the home, there have been members of the household who have hit or kicked the dog during a strong reprimanding. Yes No
60. I am really happy when I have a dog at my side. Yes No
Please respond to only one of the following questions from 61 to 63. Please locate the age appropriate question for yourself.
61. I am still in school and so far I’ve had ___________ dogs in my lifetime.
62. I am between the ages of 25 and 40 and have had __________ dogs in my lifetime. 63. I am between the ages of 45 and 65 and have had __________ dogs in my lifetime.
64. My dog is just too stupid to be trained like I would like, so I just never sought any professional help. Yes No
65. Although I’ve never taken a dog training course or read an entire dog training guide book, I still feel I am qualified to train a dog. Yes No
66. For a successful results in dog training efforts, pretty much anyone CAN do a good job providing they have the following 3 important traits: (circle the three you feel are the most important and bring the most success) A. love for the animal you are working with B. a definite plan in which to follow C. Patience of a saint and then some D. Knowledge of just how a dog absorbs the various forms of communications that we are providing regularly. E. Talent to combine the love, patience, ability to work with the dog and to know when to reward the dog and how. F. Understanding of what you are realistically trying to accomplish with this dog at this time G. It would be best for anyone who wishes to try and train a dog, to refer to a book or web site which offers tips, ideas and suggestions from a professional who has had considerable successes and experience in training jobs. H. The initial selection of the dog was actually thought out and discussed prior to our acquisition, so as to assure the family that the new member would blend nicely with our lifestyle.
67. I personally feel very strongly against families having a litter of puppies in their homes. Yes No.
68. I do not fault those who had an accidental litter, such as a dog escaping or getting lost or an intruding dog. True False
69. My family had a litter of puppies at one time. Please circle the one that HONESTLY reflects the steps you took when adopting out the puppies. (this really applies to all) A. All the adoptive parties seemed to love their new puppies, promised to take good care of him or her and we felt satisfied. B. I had presented each potential adoptee with an adoption agreement which included mandates for feeding, sleeping and altering arrangements, dates, etc. If the adoption did NOT work out with this particular party, the dog could only be brought back to me and upon visiting the new home during the firs year, it also allowed for my removal of the puppy if the situation was not what was agreed to. C. does not apply as we've never had a litter at all.
70. Regarding my answers to the previous 68 questions, I could be persuaded to make changes if it were shown to me that my actions and/or current treatment of my pets could help reduce the number of unwanted animals in the US.. YES NO
71. Knowing that he United States will kill approximately 8 million adoptable pets this year, I certainly feel very strongly that this and many other problems could be substantially improved with some form of humane education in our nation’s schools. Yes No

That completes the survey and questionnaire. 21st Century Animal Resource and Education Services appreciates the time you’ve given to fill out the questionnaire and to provide us some information for our study. Randy Warner, founder of 21st Century Cares is on a mission to help schools in 40 states to form their own humane education clubs for the students. Please visit our website at http://www.21stcenturycares.org to see his tour schedule, guidelines and missions for the clubs, along with the information he’ll deliver to the schools he and his dogs visit.
If you live in one of the cities he is planning to visit, or know of someone who does, please let Randy know. Local contacts make a world of difference when attempting to gain access to our public schools in today’s world. If you participated in this study and questionnaire and would like to see the results and score tallies, please send an email to21stcares@citlink.net to request the results at no charge. If you do not have email, please send a self addressed, stamped envelope to Randy Warner 16224 North Linda Dr HC37 Golden Valley, Arizona 86413

NOW FOR THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY WE DID THROUGHOUT 7 STATES WITH 391 PARTICIPANTS.
Summarizing Differences Between “Owners” & “Guardians” Very telling results. {This survey is set up to provide a wide variety of information from your participants. In this particular completion, we asked 391 individuals in 7 western states to fill in their choices with total anonymity. We were looking for the difference between those who keep their pets inside at night (referred to as GUARDIANS) vs. those who keep them outside at night (referred to as “OWNERS”) and the additional degree of care provided to their pets. This clearly shows the variables from those two schools of thought. Your local vets will likely confirm these findings as what they see in daily practice as well.}The dog who sleeps inside the home at night clearly lives a happier, healthier and longer life. It is more sociable, able to protect against harm and becomes an appreciated member of the family – ‘’mans’ best friend’’.
The original survey is also shown on this site and was developed by Randy Warner of 21st Century Cares. The results were tallied and reviewed by Dr. Jeanette Shutay Ph.d  In comparing those who consider themselves “owners” of their dogs and those who consider themselves “guardians” of their dogs, the following was found:
100% of the “guardians” keep their dogs inside the house at night while 0% of the “owners” do the same.
55% of the “owners” stated that their dog just sits alone in the back yard while 0% of the “guardians” reported that to be true of their dogs.
83% of the “guardians” take their dog to the vet every six months versus 0% of the “owners”.
Furthermore 30% of the “owners” take their dogs once every three years while only 4% of the “guardians” report the same to be true.
100% of the “guardians” stated that their dog is current on vaccinations while only 8% of the “owners” stated the same to be true.
89% of the “guardians” are currently displaying some form of identification or microchip for their dog versus only 18% of “owners”.
82% of the “owners” stated that they never walk their dog while only 26% of the “guardians” report the same to be true.
42% of “owners” stated that they have accidentally forgotten to provide their dog with water or food on a given day while 0% of the “guardians” report the same to be true.
86% of “owners” stated that they have relinquished a dog to a dog pound, rescue organization or another family while 0% of the “guardians” report the same to be true.
Only 14% of “owners” report that they have taken their dog to the vet within the last 18 months for a regular check-up while 100% of the “guardians” report having done so.
100% of “guardians” report that their dog is spayed or neutered while only 18% of the “owners” report the same to be true.
80% of “owners” believe that dogs who have been turned in to the pound or rescue groups must have something wrong with it and that is why they would not consider one of these dogs.
However, 0% of the “guardians” believe the same to be true. 100% of “guardians” stated that if their dog had an ear infection that would cost $500-$600 to correct, they would have it treated immediately. However, only 42% of “owners” stated that they would have it treated immediately.
80% of “owners” stated that they have had a dog who escaped their care and was never again seen or heard from while only 32% of the “guardians” reported the same to be true.
58% of “owners” stated that when training a new dog in the home, there have been members of the household who have hit or kicked the dog during a strong reprimanding.
However, only 9% of “guardians” report the same to be true. 92% of “owners” reported that their dog is just too stupid to be trained like they would like, so they just never sought any professional help. 0% of “guardians” reported the same to be true.

In closing, I believe I've shown some solid information here as to the amount of hard work being dedicated to protecting the animals and how much work - much of it through change - that is still ahead of us. The final verdict is that humans may not be geared to solving these problems because they are usually mis-guided and stumbling over hurdles of greed, ego and political agendas.

Therefore, they never work together for a common goal: the only way to accomplish a task of this magnitude. I am not suggesting that any of the large national groups should be closed down, nor boycotted, but see that the only means of ever regaining the basis of responsibility in the way we care for and protect our animals should be clearly placed back into the hands of the individual citizens. We already have the laws that we either won't, or can't enforce. And since it is well known that conscience has a much greater end result that consequence, it is humane education that I would support and promote for our youth - tomorrow's decision makers.
Nearing an end to this picture I'm trying to paint, would be my final colors: It does not take millions and billions to solve these problems. OBVIOUSLY NOT. It only takes knowledge. Everyone agrees that humane education would be beneficial. To what degree is up for discussion. Everyone agrees that we could and should do more to protect the animals. To what degree is up for discussion. Everyone agrees that our animal control efforts need to improve, the officers receive better training, the citizens receive better services, the public bear more responsibility and the large orgs could have done more with the money they've been given. To what degree is up for discussion.
We need to rejoice at our common goals, and begin to speak on these issues that we all support, with one voice. With a unified front and for the good of all people and animals.
21st Century Animal Resource and Education Services has a staff of professional humane educators and college professors who can also provide a customized program upon request. We must not lose perspective of our collective goals. We must expand our horizons to choose those campaigns that will help us to accomplish the most and save more animals in the long run. The animals who exist today are a very tiny percentage of the animals who will be killed and tortured in the coming centuries and millennia. Paying excessive attention to those who suffer today is condemning millions more to suffer the same fate. That is simply born from the ignorance of humans - providing yet another blow to animal protection’s ultimate goals. We can’t begin to win the game if only half of our team understands the rules.
The primary function of 21st Century Animal Resource and Education Services and staff, is to promote humane education through character development, project suggestions, community service, lesson plans and other outreach programs. By expanding the parameters of what people THINK they know and showing what many refuse to see, we CAN see an end to these and other problems in our lifetime by thinking outside the box. We provide all the necessary resources to implement these & to begin making changes at the community level. This program takes special interest in Humane Religion as well. We have programs for grades 5-12, troubled and at risk teens, for volunteer teachers including lesson plans, research articles & study programs. We've now made available a complete set of handbooks - a series of 'how-to' guides with over 900 pages to help humane educators around the world to become the best possible humane educators. See http://www.21stcenturycares.org/products.htm.
That being said, all we ask from the American People is to know all that you can about what surrounds you. The best way to do this is to allow others to help as well as to learn from you. Please step up and join T.H.E. T.E.A.M. Today's Humane Education That Educates And Motivates.
Finally, you need to read this last section twice!! Think about it.

Animal Protection Advocate's Version of OPUS ONE (non musical)
By Randy N. Warner

Politics, agendas, egos and all the things the animal protection movement is riddled with. All we need is some unity and intellect. Divisiveness is killing our efforts, not to mention all the lives lost. The time has come. We hope to show that individual as you may be, you are part of a society that has a HUGE problem. This problem of overpopulation takes every person to realize this so we are all singing the same song - no exceptions!
OK, We have 3,000 people in this conference hall - each to speak about their general views on animal care and their level of responsibility to correct the problems that plague our society. NO POLITICS. NO EGOS. NO APATHY.
As the microphones are turned on, each one of the 3,000 people begins singing their own song SIMULTANEOUSLY with no regard for any other song. Some sing of 'responsible breeding', some sing of ''the other person's lack of responsibility' some sing of mandatory spay and neutering' some sing of killing dogs as the only way while others see many options to the same. The sounds are deafening and just not at all pleasant - most importantly none are even remotely distinguishable.
But the most obvious are the likes of those who claim "I'm only one person and can have litters that won't make a difference at all." (these are the most uninformed and problematic of all)
Now, lets' take the same 3,000 people in the same hall an hour later. When someone steps to the front and tries to organize some unity, they all began to approach and listen. We'll make the animal rights people baritones, the animal welfare people sopranos and animal protection people altos and anyone else who is just there to be good animal people the basses.
Now, for only one chorus of one little song, we all sing together. It may not be the Mormon choir, but is so much more beautiful AND LEGIBLE than what was done before. Shortly thereafter, people of all walks of life begin to talk about how much better it was when everyone at least tried to get along and sing the same song - even if for only one chorus. They now realize that unity is important for most all projects - in order to send a clearer message and well as accomplish better results. The public now 'gets it' and the media can finally print a good solid outline of what we all agree needs to be done. We CAN convince those who think ''But I'm only one person" or those who feel ''their way is the only real way'' just how much they really do matter.
Remember, we can never expect to win the game unless all the team members play by the same rules. Politics, egos nor apathy have a place in animal protection, animal welfare or animal rights movement. We should ALL be ashamed of ourselves for all the animals who lost their lives this year that MAY HAVE been saved had we been more adult about our efforts.
We only need to convince our society that the results of each persons efforts have far reaching consequences for everyone. THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!! Politics are responsible for this report card.** In 20 years, Americans have spent $1billiion annually on community based animal control efforts = $20 Billion** In 20 years Americans have spent $1Billion annually on donations to their favorite national or local org dedicated to the same. + $20 billion** In 20 years 3,000 non profit orgs dedicated to helping animals have logged an absolute minimum of 25 billion man hours.
Our report card after 20 years? A lousy 15% reduction in unwanted deaths. That's about a D- Thanks to our inability to convince so many that the ''I'm only one person'' is no credible justification, but an ignorant persons excuse for lousing things up.
 
Randy N. Warner is a 1972 Graduate of Newton High School in Pleasant Hill, Ohio, Home of the GREAT Newton Marching Band.